Supplementation of Glutamine and Fish Oil Versus Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (GLUTFISH-HF)

November 26, 2020 updated by: Paolo Colombo, Columbia University

Effects of Glutamine and Fish Oil on Muscle Function in Heart Failure (GlutFish-HF)

The aim of this study is to determine whether supplementation of glutamine and fish oil can improve peripheral skeletal muscle function and metabolism in patients with heart failure. The investigators propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study comparing the combined supplementation of fish oil and glutamine with placebo in patients with stable heart failure. 30 patients with heart failure will be randomized to either receiving 6.5 g fish oil/d and 8 g glutamine/d (n=15) or placebo (n=15) for 90 days. The primary outcome in this study is the change in muscle functional capacity measured as changes in maximum muscle strength and fatigability, peak VO2 and exercise time after supplementation. A secondary outcome is the measurement of systemic and local markers of inflammation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age greater than 18 years,
  • left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35%,
  • stable on standard HF medications, and
  • optimal medical therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major cardiovascular events,
  • procedures in the last 6 months,
  • dementia,
  • presence of cardiovascular diseases that may lead to harm if the patient took part in the study (congenital heart disease, long QT syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, active myocarditis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The placebo for fish oil will be safflower oil. For glutamine, soy powder will serve as the placebo.
This is a prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. 38 subjects will be randomized to two groups (19 patients in each group), one taking active fish oil and glutamine supplementation and the other taking placebo for 90 days.
Active Comparator: Glutamine/Fishoil
3.285 g of EPA and 3.285 g of Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and L-alanyl-glutamine (8g/d).
This is a prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. 38 subjects will be randomized to two groups (19 patients in each group), one taking active fish oil and glutamine supplementation and the other taking placebo for 90 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Skeletal Muscle Function Capacity- Isometric Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isometric contractions, participants contracted against a constant 60-degree angle at the knee (dominant leg) and a constant 30 degree angle at the elbow (dominant arm) for 6 seconds. Participants alternated between flexion and extension, 3 repetitions each with a 30 second rest period between each. Data was collected to determine peak torque to body weight (peak torque (PKTQ)/ body weight (BW)).
Baseline
90 Day Skeletal Muscle Function Capacity- Isometric Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isometric contractions, participants contracted against a constant 60-degree angle at the knee (dominant leg) and a constant 30 degree angle at the elbow (dominant arm) for 6 seconds. Participants alternated between flexion and extension, 3 repetitions each with a 30 second rest period between each. Data was collected to determine peak torque to body weight (peak torque (PKTQ)/ body weight (BW)).
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (PKTQ/BW)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Work (WK)/Body Weight (BW))
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Days Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Work (WK)/Body Weight (BW))
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Total Work)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Total Work)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Average Power)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Average Power)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Baseline Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Time to Peak Torque)
Time Frame: Baseline
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
Baseline
90 Day Muscle Function Capacity- Isokinetic Contractions (Time to Peak Torque)
Time Frame: 90 Days
For isokinetic contractions, subjects performed flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow for 5 repetitions at a speed of 60 degrees/second. This was followed by a rest period of 2.5 minutes. For the second isokinetic protocol, subjects performed 25 repetitions of flexion and extension movements at the knee and elbow at a speed of 180 degrees/second.
90 Days
Percent Change in Peak Effort Oxygen Consumption
Time Frame: Baseline to 90 Days
Peak effort oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is measured using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET).
Baseline to 90 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Systemic and Local Inflammation
Time Frame: Baseline
Systemic and local marker of inflammation as measured by tumor necrosis factor-alpha, units pg/mL
Baseline
90 Day Systemic and Local Inflammation
Time Frame: 90 Days
Systemic and local marker of inflammation as measured by tumor necrosis factor-alpha, units pg/mL
90 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo C. Colombo, MD, Columbia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe