- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01534793
QUAPELLA (QUAlity of Prostate Enucleation by LUMENIS - Laser) (QUAPELLA)
Observational Study Evaluating the Quality of Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Using a LUMENIS Laser Device
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, multicentre observational study studying the learning curve of the HoLEP procedure, through auto-evaluation of the quality of the surgery by senior attending urologists introducing HoLEP in their current clinical practice. This is a single arm, not comparative study. The primary outcome is the ability of each surgeon to perform 4 HoLEP procedures successfully, according to a pre-defined surgical performance scale [varying from 0 to 5]. To be successful, a procedure must be scored 5/5. Each procedure is evaluated at the end of the surgical act by the surgeon himself. As secondary outcomes, the short term efficacy and safety parameters of the HoLEP technique will be evaluated through the following data prospectively collected:
- I-PSS symptom score (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- I-PSS bother score (15 days before operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- DAN-PSSsex score (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)Global sexual satisfaction (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- Quality of life score QoL-Europe (15 days before operation, and at 12 months postoperative)
- Urinary flow rate I-PSS symptom score (15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- Postvoid residual volume (15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- Ultrasound examination of the prostate (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- PSA blood testing (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)One month post-operative questionnaire at one month post-operative
- Evaluation of adverse events (the day of operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
- Satisfaction of the intervention (at 1 and 12 months postoperative)
- Pathologic examination of the prostate tissue (at 1 months postoperative)
- Blood levels of sodium, haemoglobin, and haematocrit (15 days before intervention, immediately after intervention,)
Time needed for each step of the procedure:
- prostatic capsule contact
- enucleation of the median lobe
- enucleation of the lateral lobes
- hemostasis
- morcellation Laser data (duration, Joules number number of fibers used, fibre type, morcellator ans nephroscope type)
- Tissue weight
- Irrigation volume
- Need for coagulation with another device
- Adverse events during the procedure
- Type of catheter after surgery
- Duration of the catheterization
- Post-operative irrigation (duration, volume, type)
- Hospital stay. The indications of the surgery are the usual indications for bladder outlet obstruction relief in ta context of low urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, as an alternative to the other level 1
- Grade A recommended surgical techniques. The profile of every surgeon will be recorded in terms of surgical experience with age, number of previous endoscopic prostatic surgical procedures, number of laser procedures.
The study design is scheduled as follows:
- Inclusion visit (between D-25 and D-5 before surgery), for inclusion written informed consent as assessment of baseline data
- Surgical intervention (D0): performed as previously described in the literature, with assessment of perioperative data
- One month visit: one month data
- Six month visit: six months data
- One year visit: one year data Statistical analysis will be conducted under SAS9.2 as descriptive analysis for all data, CUSUM technique for main outcome criterion (Altman et al. Stat Med 1988 7 : 629-637 and modelisation of the learning curve.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ile de France
-
Paris, Ile de France, France, 75020
- Service Urologie - Hôpital Tenon
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male patients over 50
- Classification of risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: score 1, 2 or 3
- Protocol accepted by patient (signed informed consent)
- Patient presenting low urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, since at least 3 months, with indication of surgical relief of bladder outlet obstruction , with International prostate symptom score (I-PSS)≥ 12 and a bother score ≥ 3, or full bladder retention, drained by a catheter or suprapubic catheter
- Patient with maximum urinary flow rate ≤ 12mL/s for a voiding volume ≥ 125mLat uroflowmetry, for patients who are not drained
- Prostate weight between 40 and 80 grams
- Post void residual volume ≤ 300cc, for patients who are not drained
- Normal renal function
- Non suspect digital rectal examination
- PSA value et blood test £ 4 ng/ml, or negative prostatic biopsies if PSA comprised between 4 and 10 ng/ml for patients with age < 75 and life expectancy > 10 years
- Patient under oral anticoagulation therapy if a therapeutic switch is possible and validated by both the anaesthesiologist and the prescription of the anticoagulation therapy
- Patient under under antiplatelet agents if this treatment can be interrupted without replacement therapy 5 days prior to surgery without any increased risk for the patient safety
- Patient gave informed consent and is not opposed to the use of the data collected during the study for research purpose
- Patient treated by BPH drugs if the duration and type are known, and if the treatment has been stopped before the intervention (one week before surgery for plants and alpha-blockers, one week for 5-alpha reductase inhibitors)
- Patients has valid health insurance/coverage.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with unstable known cardiac or pulmonary disease
- Patients with severe myasthenia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease with known bladder or urinary sphincter dysfunction.
- Patient with history of severe pelvic injury having caused severe external urinary sphincter damage.
- Patient with active urinary tract infection
- Patient with urinary catheter or a suprapubic catheter for a reason other than acute urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia or experiencing no need to urinate after an event filling than 300cc
- Patient with neurogenic disease of the urinary tract
- Patient with known or suspected malignant lesion of the bladder or the prostate
- Patient with history of previous prostatic surgery
- Patient with history of bladder stone, major hematuria, urethral stricture, bladder neck stenosis, bladder disease or diabetes with bladder impairment
- Patient with a prosthesis or material in the region potentially affected by the surgical procedure.
- Patient with ano-rectal disease
- Cases where the surgical indication is decided in an emergency context
- Patient with predictable incomplete follow-up
- Patient with coagulation disease or abnormalities not covered by the drugs belonging to the categories cited in inclusion criteria 11 and 12
- All patient condition that the investigator considers as an exclusion criterion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
HoLEP
Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
|
Under regional or general anaesthesia Urethroscopy to check the location of the prostatic capsule Enucleation of the prostatic lobes (median if present, then lateral lobes)Hemostasis Morcellation Device : LUMENIS Laser
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The primary outcome is the ability of each surgeon to perform 4 HoLEP procedures successfully, according to a pre-defined surgical performance scale [varying from 0 to 5].
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
The primary outcome is the ability of each surgeon to perform 4 HoLEP procedures successfully, according to a pre-defined surgical performance scale [varying from 0 to 5].
To be successful, a procedure must be scored 5/5.
Each procedure is evaluated at the end of the surgical act by the surgeon himself.
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
I-PSS symptom score (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
|
15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
|
|
|
I-PSS bother score (15 days before operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
DAN-PSSsex score (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Global sexual satisfaction (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Quality of life score QoL-Europe (15 days before operation, and at 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, and at 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, and at 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Urinary flow rate I-PSS symptom score (15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Postvoid residual volume (15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at day 0, and at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Ultrasound examination of the prostate (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
PSA blood testing (15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: 15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
15 days before operation, at 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
One month post-operative questionnaire
Time Frame: at 1 month
|
at 1 month
|
|
|
Evaluation of adverse events (the day of operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: the day of operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
the day of operation, at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Satisfaction of the intervention (at 1 and 12 months postoperative)
Time Frame: at 1 and 12 months postoperative
|
at 1 and 12 months postoperative
|
|
|
Pathologic examination of the prostate tissue
Time Frame: at 1 month postoperative
|
Pathologic examination of the prostate tissue (at 1 month postoperative)
|
at 1 month postoperative
|
|
Blood levels of sodium, haemoglobin, and haematocrit (15 days before intervention, immediately after intervention,)
Time Frame: 15 days befor intervention, immediately after intervention
|
15 days befor intervention, immediately after intervention
|
|
|
Intervention duration
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
|
|
Time needed for each step of the procedure
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
Time needed for each step of the procedure:
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
|
Laser data
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
Laser data (duration, Joules number number of fibers used, fibre type, morcellator ans nephroscope type)
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
|
Tissue weight
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
|
|
Irrigation volume
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
|
|
Need for coagulation with another device
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
|
|
Adverse events at the day of operation, at 1, 6,12 months post-operative
Time Frame: the day of operation, at 1, 6,12 months post-operative
|
the day of operation, at 1, 6,12 months post-operative
|
|
|
Type of catheter at the surgery
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
participants will be followed for the duration of the intervention, an expected average of 1 hour
|
|
|
Duration of the catheterization
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
|
|
Post-operative irrigation (duration, volume, type)
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
|
|
Hospital stay
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1,5 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bertrand LUKACS, MD,PhD, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- K070301 / IC0709
- 2008-A-00498-47 (Other Identifier: IDRCB)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
University of CalgaryNot yet recruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionCanada
-
San Carlo di Nancy HospitalElesta S.R.L.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow Obstruction | Prostate HyperplasiaItaly
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonOntario Ministry of Health and Long Term CareCompletedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaCanada
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) | Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)Italy
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic, Czechia, Sweden
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic
-
South Valley UniversityRecruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Requiring Surgical Resection | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionEgypt
-
IMBiotechnologies Ltd.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic HypertrophyCanada
-
Astellas Pharma Korea, Inc.Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleUnknownBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaItaly
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRecruiting
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityEnrolling by invitationBPH | Prostate ObstructionRussian Federation
-
Cairo UniversityTheodor Bilharz Research InstituteCompletedMale | BPH With Urinary ObstructionEgypt
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterRecruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityNot yet recruitingBenign Prostate Obstruction (BPO)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityTheodor Bilharz Research InstituteCompletedMale | BPH With Urinary ObstructionEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedMale | BPH With Urinary ObstructionEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingBladder Outlet Obstruction | Lower Urinary Tract Symptom | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)Egypt
-
Royal Victoria Hospital, CanadaMcGill UniversityCompletedBenign Prostate HyperplasiaCanada