Comparison of the Local Anaesthetics Articaine and Bupivacaine in Treatment of Acute Sternum Pain After Heart Surgery

May 3, 2019 updated by: Reino Poyhia, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Comparison of Periosteal and Subcutaneous Infusions of Articaine and Bupivacaine in Treatment of Acute Pain After Sternotomy

The purpose of this study is to examine the wound infusion of articaine for treatment of acute post-sternotomy pain in a placebo-controlled manner using a prospective and randomized design and an active control (bupivacaine)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute pain after open heart surgery can be moderate or strong and is mostly caused by sternotomy. Pain is the worst during the first two post-operative days and, if not adequately treated, can delay the patient´s recovery from surgery. Sternotomy pain can be alleviated by using paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. All these drugs may have remarkable side-effects which may delay the recovery from surgery: opioids are respiratory depressants and slower the gastrointestinal motility, NSAIDs reduce intrarenal blood flow and may disturb coagulation. Post-operative opioid consumption can be reduced by using wound infiltration analgesia.

The use of wound infiltration analgesia has not been extensively investigated in treatment of acute pain after sternotomy. There is some evidence, that 0.5% bupivacaine reduces the acute post-sternotomy pain when infused constantly via catheters placed under the fascia (periosteal placement) and the skin.

During 48 hours infusion toxic bupivacaine plasma levels were not observed. There is an evidence that local anesthetics can be bacteriostatic both in vitro and in vivo.

Articaine is an amide-type local anesthetics, which has been used extensively in dental procedures since more than forty years. It has been successfully used in infiltration, epidural, spinal and other regional anesthesia procedures. Articaine is quickly hydrolyzed in plasma and excreted by kidneys. Clearance of articain (500-1110l/h) is faster than that of lidocaine (68l/h) and it is also the reason for articaine´s low toxicity profile. Because of it´s low toxicity and high ability to penetrate the periosteal tissue, articaine may be advantageous in treatment of acute pain after sternotomy, but aforementioned indication for use of articaine has not been investigated. Compared to other local anesthetics, articaine in high concentration has the same neurotoxicity profile, when injected directly into rat´s sciatic nerve. Articaine has not been extensively compared to other local anesthetics, but according the latest odontologic investigation, single dose 0.5% bupivacaine and single-dose 4% articaine were comparable in their analgesic effects during tooth extraction procedure. There are no controlled randomized trials comparing analgesic effect of articaine and other local anesthetics infusions.

In our investigation bupivacain 0.5 % was chosen as an active control, because it has appeared effective in acute postoperative pain and it has reduced the need for opioid analgetics after sternotomy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Uusimaa
      • Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland, 00029
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Divison of Surgery, Meilahti hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
      • Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland, 00029
        • Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Division of Surgery, Meilahti hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elective procedure
  • open heart surgery
  • aortic valve surgery
  • mitral valve surgery
  • atrial septal defect repair surgery
  • intracardial myxoma removal surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • local anesthetic allergy
  • sulphide allergy
  • asthma
  • pregnant women
  • neurological disease (TIA excluded)
  • congestive heart failure
  • left ventricle ejection fracture under 0.3
  • liver failure
  • diabetes mellitus with documented polyneuropathy
  • chronic pain condition
  • mother tongue not finnish or swedish
  • patients, who do not agree blood transfusions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5%
Bupivacaine hydrochloride is related chemically and pharmacologically to the aminoacyl local anesthetics. Bupivacaine hydrochloride is indicated for the production of local or regional anesthesia or analgesia for surgery, for oral surgery procedures, for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and for obstetrical procedures.
  • 4 ml/h periosteal wound infusion
  • duration of 72 h
Other Names:
  • Ultracain D ohne Adrenalin 20 mg/ml, ATC code N01BB08
Placebo Comparator: Sodium chloride 0,9%
Placebo Sodium chloride 0,9%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Oxycodone consumption
Time Frame: 72 hours from initiation of treatment
72 hours from initiation of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intensity of pain in rest/in movement (AUC)
Time Frame: 72 hours from initiation of treatment
72 hours from initiation of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Reino Pöyhiä, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care, Division of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Mihkel Meinberg, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Division of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Disorder

Clinical Trials on Articaine hydrochloride 2% solution

Subscribe