Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Bone Blocks or Xenogenic Bone Block Grafts Loaded With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein 2

A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Bone Blocks or Xenogenic Bone Block Grafts Loaded With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein 2

Since there are no clinical studies available comparing the gold standard (autogenous bone graft plus resorbable membrane) to the promising combination of xenogenic bone graft loaded with rhBMP-2 in combination with a collagen membrane for localized ridge augmentation, the present exploratory study has been designed.

The aim of the present study is therefore to test whether or not the application of a xenogenic bone block loaded with rhBMP-2 will results in clinically, radiographically and histologically similar outcomes as the gold standard (autogenous bone block) for the regeneration of chronic ridge defects.

The investigators expect that there is no difference in bone quantity and quality between the two methods and that the use of the test treatment will be more user and patient friendly according to the patient perception/acceptance since no second surgical site will be necessary as well as cause less complications.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Missing Teeth
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Autogenous bone graft; Drug: InductOs; Procedure: Augmentation surgery

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 24
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Austria
  • Graz, Austria
    • Department of Oral Surgery & Radiology, Dental School, Medical University of Graz
• Switzerland
  • Zurich, Switzerland, 8032
    • Center of Dental Medicine Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• requiring implant therapy for the reconstruction of 1 to 4 missing teeth
• revealing insufficient bone volume for implant placement (cases where less than 50% of the implant surface would be surrounded by native bone) requiring bone augmentation procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

• Medication with a contraindication for implant therapy
• Previous administration of InductOs
• Skeletal immaturity
• Any active malignancy or patient undergoing treatment for a malignancy
• An active infection at the operative site
• Persistent compartment syndrome or neurovascular residua of compartment syndrome
• Pathological fractures such as those observed in (but not limited to) Paget's disease or in metastatic bone
• Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to class of drugs or the investigational product,
• Contraindications on ethical grounds,
• Pregnancy,
• Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study,
• Breast feeding,
• Treatment with other investigational products,
• Other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc),
• Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,
• Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia or confusional state of the subject,
• Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
• Previous enrolment into the current study,
• Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons,
• Patients where autogenous bone cannot be harvested.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group (A); Bone augmentation will be performed using autogenous bone from the retromolar or chin area followed by a fixation with titanium screws at the recipients site; filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and covered with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland). These course of action is well documented in the literature and standard procedures.	Device: Autogenous bone graft; Bone augmentation will be performed using autogenous bone from the retromolar or chin area followed by a fixation with titanium screws at the recipients site; filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and covered with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland)
Experimental: Test group (B); The bone augmentation will be performed using a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) block (Bio-Oss Spongiosa Block®, Geistlich Parma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) similarly to the control group. In addition, DBBM will be loaded with rhBMPH-2 (InductOs®, Pfizer AG, Zurich, Switzerland).	Drug: InductOs; CE-marked medical device Bio-Oss Spongiosa Block® (xenogenic bone) loaded with InductOs® (1.5 mg Dibotermin alfa / ml) covered with Bio-Gide® (collagen membrane). One time application at augmentation surgery.; Procedure: Augmentation surgery; CE-marked medical device Bio-Oss Spongiosa Block® (xenogenic bone) loaded with InductOs® (1.5 mg Dibotermin alfa / ml) covered with Bio-Gide® (collagen membrane)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Bone quality/quantity	Bone quantity at 4 months after augmentation surgery, measured manually by ridge measurements and volumetrically on the basis of optical impressions and radiological assessment (X-ray and cone beam CT). Bone quality at 4 months after augmentation surgery, measured by histological assessment (yields different proportion per patient).	4 month after augmentation surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Complications	Complications (soft tissue, sensitivity) measured at suture removal (8 days after augmentation surgery) and 4 months after augmentation surgery. Any adverse events will be recorded for the treatment period from visit 1 to 4.	8 days and 4 month after augmentation surgery
Bone quantity	Bone quantity measured at screening, augmentation surgery, suture removal, and during follow-up	at screening, augmentation surgery, suture removal, and during follow-up
Patient's perception/acceptance	Patient's perception/acceptance (visual analogue scale VAS) measured at suture removal (8 days after augmentation surgery)	8 days after augmentation surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Zurich
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Daniel S Thoma, Prof. Dr., Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: February 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 25, 2014
• Study Completion (Actual): June 4, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 23, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 23, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): February 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): December 2, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 21, 2021
• Last Verified: November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Congenital Abnormalities; Stomatognathic Diseases; Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Stomatognathic System Abnormalities; Tooth Abnormalities; Tooth Loss; Anodontia
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2012DR2009