Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery

July 5, 2016 updated by: Nicolai Goettel

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Awake craniotomy for resection of brain tumor located in close proximity to areas of eloquent brain function, such as speech, motor and sensory, is an accepted procedure used to minimize neurological injury during resection. During awake craniotomy, anesthesia is usually provided using a combination of local anesthesia (regional scalp block and/or local infiltration) and intravenous (IV) agents to provide sedation, anxiolysis and analgesia. Propofol sedation, commonly in combination with a shorter acting opioid such as fentanyl, or remifentanil, is an effective and popular technique during awake craniotomy, achieving a high degree of patient satisfaction and acceptance. Most of the anesthetic agents are associated with some respiratory depression.

The anesthetic agent called dexmedetomidine is a potent, highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist. The effects of dexmedetomidine are anxiolysis, analgesia, sedation and sympatholysis, and it is not associated with respiratory depressive effect. Bekker et al. first reported the successful use of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy in 2001.

The purpose of this blinded, prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-remifentanil based sedation in patients undergoing awake craniotomy for resection of tumors. The study hypothesis is that the efficacy of performing intra-operative brain mapping is identical between dexmedetomidine and the propofol-remifentanil based sedation. The primary end-points are to assess the ability to perform intraoperative mapping during awake craniotomy. Secondary end-points will assess the incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia), as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Awake craniotomy for resection of brain tumor located in close proximity to areas of eloquent brain function, such as speech, motor and sensory, is an accepted procedure used to minimize neurological injury during resection. The level of sedation and analgesia during the different stages of surgery varies, but importantly, the patient needs to be awake and alert during brain mapping. During awake craniotomy, anesthesia is usually provided using a combination of local anesthesia (regional scalp block and/or local infiltration) and intravenous (IV) agents to provide sedation, anxiolysis and analgesia. There is considerable variation in the anesthetic management of the awake craniotomy in different institutions. Propofol sedation, commonly in combination with a shorter acting opioid such as fentanyl, or remifentanil, is an effective and popular technique during awake craniotomy, achieving a high degree of patient satisfaction and acceptance. However, the awake craniotomy remains one of the most challenging techniques of anesthesia care in terms of balancing an adequate depth of sedation and analgesia to combat the rapid changes of surgical stimulation yet having an alert patient for brain mapping. Furthermore, most of the anesthetic agents are associated with some respiratory depression.

A newer anesthetic agent called dexmedetomidine (Precedex (TM), Hospira Healthcare Corporation, Saint Laurent, Québec, Canada) is a potent, highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with an α2:α1 selectivity ratio of 1600:1. It has been available in the Canada since 2009 as a short-term sedative agent, and is available in the UHN. The use of dexmedetomidine has been in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU and for intra-operative sedation. The well-documented beneficial effects of dexmedetomidine are anxiolysis, analgesia, sedation and sympatholysis, and it is not associated with respiratory depressive effect.

Dexmedetomidine has been successfully used to provide sedation in dental procedures, awake fibreoptic intubation, bariatric surgery and morbidly obese patients, as well as obstructive sleep apnea patients. The pharmacokinetic properties of dexmedetomidine is very predictable and titratable, with a rapid distribution half-life (t1/2α) being approximately 5-6min and an elimination half-life (t1/2β) of approximately 2h. Bekker et al. first reported the successful use of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy in 2001. Subsequent case series published by Souter et al. demonstrated that dexmedetomidine can be used either as a sole agent or in combination with other agents such as fentanyl during seizure foci resection with accurate intraoperative brain mapping.

The hypnotic effect of dexmedetomidine is mediated by the hyperpolarization of noradrenergic neurons in the locus ceruleus, which proposed that dexmedetomidine converges on a natural sleep pathway to exert its sedative effect. Venn and co-workers, as part of a large European multicentre trial investigating dexmedetomidine for postoperative sedation in the ICU, reported that: "Patients are calmly and easily roused from sleep to allow excellent communication and cooperation while intubated and ventilated, and then similarly quickly return to sleep". This unique sedation state is very useful for awake craniotomy, which requires deep level of sedation during painful operative procedures, as well as easily rousable state during mapping of eloquent function.

The purpose of this blinded, prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-remifentanil based sedation in patients undergoing awake craniotomy for resection of tumors. The study hypothesis is that the efficacy of performing intra-operative brain mapping is identical between dexmedetomidine and the propofol-remifentanil based sedation. The primary end-points are to assess the ability to perform intraoperative mapping during awake craniotomy. Secondary end-points will assess the incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia), as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • UHN Toronto Western Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients more than 18 years of age.
  • ASA score I, II and III.
  • Patients scheduled to undergo awake craniotomy for elective tumor resection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with allergies to the drugs being used.
  • Patients who are pregnant.
  • Patients with alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Patients who are not able to understand the instructions for an awake craniotomy and questions regarding intra-operative pain, and post-operative satisfaction.
  • Lack of informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Propofol-Remifentanil
Group I. (propofol/remifentanil): Infusions begin at remifentanil (0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min) and propofol (25-250 mcg/kg/min) for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.
Drug: Propofol
The infusion begins at propofol 25-250 mcg/kg/min for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.
Other Names:
  • Diprivan (TM)
Drug: Remifentanil
The infusion begins at remifentanil 0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.
Other Names:
  • Ultiva (TM)
Experimental: Dexmedetomidine
Group II. (dexmedetomidine): The infusion begins at 0.3-0.4 mcg/kg/hr for 15 min, and then titrated down to 0.1-0.2 mcg/kg/hr.
Drug: Dexmedetomidine
The infusion begins at dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.4 mcg/kg/hr for 15 min, and then titrated down to 0.1-0.2 mcg/kg/hr.
Other Names:
  • Precedex (TM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Ability to perform intra-operative mapping during awake craniotomy
Time Frame: immediately, intra-operative
immediately, intra-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia)
Time Frame: intra-operatively, 2h post-operatively, 24h post-operatively
intra-operatively, 2h post-operatively, 24h post-operatively
Patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique
Time Frame: intra-opeartively, 2h post-operatively, 24h post-operatively
intra-opeartively, 2h post-operatively, 24h post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Nicolai Goettel

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pirjo Manninen, MD, FRCPC, Head of Neuroanesthesia, Associate Professor, University Health Network, Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Study Director: Nicolai Goettel, MD, University Health Network, Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-0607-A

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Tumor

Clinical Trials on Propofol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Finland

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe