Bias Source of Signal in SCOUT DS (BSOS)

January 14, 2013 updated by: VeraLight, Inc.
The primary objective is to identify device characteristics, components or subsystems that manifest as screening score bias in SCOUT DS.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

In the process of calibrating multiple SCOUT DS units, consistent inter-device score differences were found. These differences could create a bias in the measurement of Diabetes Risk scores (DRS) in human subjects. This study is intended to examine two of the various subsystems of the SCOUT DS to determine whether either of them might be capable of introducing bias into the measurements, with the ultimate aim of eliminating inter-device measurement variation.

The testing of human subjects in this trial is necessary to determine whether variability in the performance of these device subsystems actually affect DRS scores in a real world setting.

The trial will be a prospective, single site, investigational trial. The trial will utilize four SCOUT DS devices. Subjects will report to the investigative site for multiple visits. The number of visits will vary between three to seven visits.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
        • VeraLight

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects must be 18 years of age or greater.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and/ or females greater than or equal to 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have received investigational treatments in the past 14 days
  • Have psychosocial issues that interfere with an ability to follow study procedures
  • Are known to be pregnant
  • Have scars, tattoos, rashes or other disruption/discoloration on the left volar forearm.
  • Have been treated in the past month with oral steroid therapy or topical steroids applied to the left forearm. Inhaled steroid therapy is not a basis for exclusion
  • Are receiving medications that fluoresce (A list of excluded medications is located in Appendix H)
  • Are known to have, or at risk for, photosensitivity reactions ( e.g., sensitive to ultraviolet light, or taking medication known to cause photosensitivity)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine Device Bias
Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The primary objective of this study is to identify device characteristics, components, or subsystems that manifest as screening score bias in SCOUT DS.

The study will switch subsystems between devices and if the bias differs by more than 3.5 Diabetes Risk Score units compared to the baseline score, we would conclude that the bias was contained within that particular subsystem

Up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jon Aase, MD, VeraLight, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

3
Subscribe