Bioness® StimRouter™ Neuromodulation System for Chronic Pain Therapy

March 11, 2016 updated by: Bioness Inc

Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the Bioness® StimRouter™ Neuromodulation System in Patients With Chronic Pain of Peripheral Nerve Origin

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the StimRouter (SR) electrical stimulation therapy leads to clinically important pain relief in patients with chronic intractable pain of peripheral nerve origin after three months of treatment. At the same time, this study will gather information on side effects associated with the StimRouter electrical stimulation therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ninety (minimum) up to one hundred twenty-six (126) adult (≥ 22 years) subjects who have severe intractable chronic pain of peripheral nerve origin associated with post traumatic/post surgical neuralgia persisting for 3 months or longer and an average chronic pain level of at least 5 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where such pain is attributable to a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system, will be recruited from U.S. outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics.

After screening, subjects who were confirmed to be eligible for the study and provided informed consent will have a pain level assessment period for approximately one week then come back for the Baseline/Implantation visit. Subjects will be trained on and required to complete a patient diary of pain intensity level for at least 7 consecutive days prior to baseline. The randomization and programming will take place approximately two weeks after implantation. Subjects in the treatment group will receive electrical stimulation and pain medication. In contrast, subjects in the parallel control group will receive control stimulation and pain medication.

The plan is to have the parallel portion of the study run for approximately 12 weeks (or 3 months) after randomization for efficacy analysis. Subjects in the control group will be allowed to cross over to the treatment group for nine months of electrical stimulation; the subjects in the treatment group will have nine additional months of stimulation treatment such that safety data will be collected throughout a full twelve month period on all available subjects. While the end of the study is approximately 12 months after randomization, as previously stated, the efficacy analyses will be based on the data collected at the end of the 3-month follow-up evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
        • Arizona Pain Specialists
    • California
      • Napa, California, United States, 94558
        • Neurovations
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Neuro-Therapeutics, Inc.
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90403
        • The Spine Institute, Center for Spinal Restoration
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33334
        • Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Dept of Neurology Research
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, United States, 61701
        • Millennium Pain Center
    • New Jersey
      • Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States, 07702
        • Premier Pain Centers, LLC
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Medical Center
    • West Virginia
      • Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25301
        • Center for Pain Relief, St. Francis Hospital
      • Huntington, West Virginia, United States, 25702
        • The Center for Pain Relief at St. Mary's Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (≥ 22 years) suitable for an implanted electrode for pain relief.
  2. Subjects who are able to give informed consent and to understand and comply with study requirements.
  3. Subjects who have severe intractable chronic pain of peripheral nerve origin associated with post traumatic/post surgical neuralgia for ≥ 3 months (i.e., intractable to pain medication).
  4. Subjects who are able to tolerate skin surface stimulation (TENS).
  5. Subjects who have a worst chronic pain level in the last 24 hours ≥ 5/10 (on 0-10 NRS) where such pain is attributable to a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system.
  6. Subjects who are on a stable dose of pain medications for at least four weeks prior to screening and willing and able to maintain an equivalent dosage of their current pain medications from randomization to 3-month follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who are not willing and able to maintain stable dosages of their pain medications from randomization to 3-month follow-up.
  2. Subjects with a pain condition that could be confused with their peripheral neuropathic pain or that is more severe than their peripheral neuropathic pain.
  3. Subjects who, for implantation in the trunk, have an implanted demand-type cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator.
  4. Subjects who have a metal implant in the area for StimRouter implantation without Sponsor approval. Maintain a minimum separation distance of 6 inches (15 cm) between the StimRouter system and all other active implanted devices and metallic implants.
  5. Subjects who require, or are likely to require, diathermy at the implant site.
  6. Subjects who require, or are likely to require, therapeutic ultrasound at the implant site.
  7. Subjects who have a cancerous lesion present near the target stimulation point or near to where the StimRouter user patch will adhere.
  8. Subjects who are known or suspected to have a nickel allergy.
  9. Subjects with bleeding disorders or active anticoagulation that cannot be stopped for a few days close to the time of the surgical procedure.
  10. Subjects who decline to provide written consent or follow-up.
  11. Subjects who are pregnant, plan on becoming pregnant, or are breastfeeding during the study period. Subjects who are female of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline visit and, if sexually active, must be using a medically acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study participation.
  12. Subjects who have an active systemic infection or are immunocompromised.
  13. Subjects who have an active or existing skin disorder or irritation, which, at the physician's discretion, precludes the use of skin gel electrodes.
  14. Subjects who currently require or are likely to require Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) within the MRI exclusion zone: the entire StimRouter lead must be at least 50 cm from the center of the MR system's bore (the iso-center) and at least 16 cm outside of the MR coil measured from the edge of the MR coil.
  15. Subjects who have a history of adverse reactions to local anesthetic (e.g., lidocaine).
  16. Subjects who are participating in any other study that could affect the outcome of the StimRouter study, such as a spinal stimulation study, without Sponsor approval.
  17. Subjects who are in litigation or who have pending or an active worker's compensation claim.
  18. Subjects with less than one year of life expectancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: StimRouter - active stimulation
StimRouter- active electrical stimulation is applied transdermally to a targeted peripheral nerve. This is accomplished via a fully implanted StimRouter lead that receives energy from a rechargeable programmed external pulse transmitter (EPT) with attached gel electrodes. The EPT receives radio frequency (RF) commands from a Patient Programmer. A StimRouter Clinician Programmer is used to program the StimRouter EPT and Patient Programmer. Up to eight stimulation programs may be saved on a Patient Programmer for on-demand selection by the study patient.

The stimulation program settings for this arm are as follows:

Stim Settings

  • Waveform: Symmetric or Asymmetric
  • Phase Duration: 100-250 µsec
  • Pulse Rate: 50-100 Hz
  • Intensity: 0-30mA Time Settings
  • Constant Stim: On
  • Total Time: 6 hour
Other Names:
  • Bioness® StimRouter™ Neuromodulation System
Sham Comparator: StimRouter - Control
StimRouter- Electrical stimulation is withheld from the targeted peripheral nerve after fully implanting the StimRouter lead. The rechargeable programmed external pulse transmitter (EPT) with attached gel electrodes is placed for transdermal stimulation but no stimulation is delivered. The EPT which normally receives radio frequency (RF) commands from a Patient Programmer is not activated. A StimRouter Clinician Programmer is used to program the StimRouter EPT and Patient Programmer such that no stimulation occurs in the Control Arm of the study.

The stimulation program settings for this arm are as follows:

Stim Settings

  • Waveform: Symmetric or Asymmetric
  • Phase Duration: 200 µsec
  • Pulse Rate: 1 Hz
  • Intensity: 0 mA Time Settings
  • Constant Stim: On
  • Total Time: 6 hour
Other Names:
  • Bioness® StimRouter™ Neuromodulation System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Number of Participants With a Pain Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to 30%
Time Frame: Baseline and at 3-month follow-up.
The average pain at rest was assessed using a numerical (0-10) rating scale (NRS) on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form (SF). A higher score indicates worse pain (10=worst pain imaginable) and zero indicates 'no pain at all'. A pain reduction of greater than or equal to 30% on the NRS was considered to be clinically relevant.
Baseline and at 3-month follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Impression of Improvement With Treatment Will be Assessed Using the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC).
Time Frame: at 3 month follow-up
Patient Global Impression of Change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall life quality related to their painful condition (Range 1 to 7, with 1 indicating no change and 7 indicating a great deal better/considerable improvement).
at 3 month follow-up
Worst Pain in the Last 24 Hours Will be Assessed Using 7-day Patient Pain Diary Scores for BPI SF #3.
Time Frame: at baseline and 3 month follow-up
Worst pain in the last 24 hours assessed using 7-day patient pain diary scores for BPI ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating "pain as bad as you can imagine". Change from baseline to Month 3 was compared.
at baseline and 3 month follow-up
Patient Satisfaction Will be Assessed Using a Patient Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: at the 3-month follow-up
Patient satisfaction with the StimRouter System was rated on a numerical rating scale (range 0 to 10), with 0 indicating not satisfied at all and 10 indicating completely satisfied.
at the 3-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Linh Nguyen, MS, Bioness Inc
  • Principal Investigator: Ramsin Benyamin, M.D., Millennium Pain Center
  • Study Chair: Timothy Deer, M.D., Center for Pain Relief, St. Francis Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CP-STMR11-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on StimRouter - active stimulation

Subscribe