Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT)

September 20, 2021 updated by: Lisa Arnold, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix

Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Study

With evolving endovascular technologies there is a growing debate centered on the relative safety and efficacy of the currently accepted alternatives for the treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in the face of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms in a prospective, randomized fashion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The planned trial enrolled 250 subjects per arm. Subjects are followed postoperatively and outcome endpoints will be assessed at Discharge, 6 Months, 1 Year, 3 Years, and 6 Years. One hundred (100) subjects will participate in neuropsychological testing at 1 Year; after the 100th subject an interim data analysis will be performed and the viability of future neuropsychological testing will be determined. Subjects will receive preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative, 3 Year follow up, and 6 Year follow up angiograms. In this fashion immediate clinical outcome, including peri-procedural morbidity and mortality, will be assessed as will long term outcome, both clinical and angiographic.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
        • St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
  • Confirmed by CT scan or lumbar puncture
  • Age 18-80 years
  • Ability to give informed consent (subject or legally authorized representative)
  • No anatomic inclusions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Presents to hospital >14 days post-bleed
  • SAH caused by other primary disease
  • No anatomic exclusions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Endovascular
Subjects randomized to endovascular coil embolization will be treated by one of two neurosurgeons expert in such treatment. All endovascular coil embolization treatments will be accomplished using accepted techniques.
Subjects randomized to endovascular therapy will be treated by one of two neurosurgeons expert in such treatment. All endovascular treatments will be accomplished using accepted techniques.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Surgical
Subjects randomized to surgical clip occlusion repair will receive treatment from one of two neurosurgeons expert in clip occlusion surgery for ruptured aneurysms.
Subjects randomized to surgical therapy will receive treatment from one of two neurosurgeons expert in surgery for ruptured aneurysms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: 10 years
Primary Outcome Measure is Modified Rankin Scale < or = to 2. Data will be analyzed on intent to treat basis with crossover to the alternative treatment analyzed as a data subset. The null hypothesis is that no difference in outcome will be detected between the endovascular and surgical treatment arms. A statistically significant difference will then be considered evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis, that one treatment is superior to the other.
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert F Spetzler, MD, Barrow Brain and Spine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2002

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 25, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on coil embolization

3
Subscribe