The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Spondylodesis Operation in the Elderly With Spinal Stenosis Due to Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (IVANOS)

September 5, 2016 updated by: Michael Kjaer Jacobsen, Sygehus Lillebaelt

The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Spondylodesis Operation

The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudication(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavus, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc.

Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation.

Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.(Ausman).

Clinical improvement including decrease of pain, improved ADL-function and an increased quality of life are parameters of highest interest and the purpose of an operation is clear: Making sufficient room for the affected nerves. In addition fusion is desired achieving stability avoiding a new compression of the nerves. Studies attending these issues find a correlation between fusion and clinical outcome, why obtained fusion of the affected levels are very important(Andersen et al.;Andersen et al.;Girardo et al.;Kornblum MB FAU - Fischgrund et al.).

P-15, bound to Anorganisk Bone Mineral (ABM), called i-FACTOR®, shows fusion superiority, no side effects and no risk of transferring disease(Thorwarth et al. 5648-57;Thorwarth et al. 789-95;Wenz, Oesch, and Horst 1599-606;Scarano et al. 318-24;Kubler et al. 171-79) why the investigators find this material suited for fusion surgery in the elderly.

To the investigators knowledge this is the first prospective study comparing fusion rates and postoperative clinic with i-FACTOR vs allograft in older patients operated with decompression and spondylodesis because of spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Hypothesis:

There are no difference in the clinical parameters measured by ODI and fusion rates comparing i-FACTOR® and allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis-operations in patients 60 years and older.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

108

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Middelfart, DK, Denmark, 5500
        • Sygehuslillebaelt
    • Region syddanmark
      • Middelfart, Region syddanmark, Denmark, 5500
        • Rygkirurgisk sektor Middelfart

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal stenosis, olisthesis grade 1-2 (>3 mm), facet joint arthrosis and flavus hypertrophia verified by a mr-scan and x-ray including maximally 2 levels ranging from L1-S1.
  • A score of 6 and more on Konno´s "History of Examination Characteristic".
  • Signed informed content.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any disease demanding obligate thromboprophylaxis treatment, including mechanical valve, (DVT with cancer/thrombophilia, AMI, apoplexia cerebri, TCI, valve-operation)< 3 months, coronar metal stent < 6 weeks and coronar drug eluted/coated stent < 12 months.
  • Atrial fibrillation and one of the following: Mitral stenosis, valveprothesis and apoplexia cerebri/TCI.
  • Atrial fibrillation and two of the following: Heart insufficient, HT, DM, age > 75 years, EF < 35 %.
  • Known cancer in the axial skeleton.
  • Ongoing chemotherapy.
  • Fracture i the lower back within a year prior to inclusion.
  • Reduced distance of walking due to non-spinal related causes.
  • Candidate for more than two-level intervention.
  • Dementia assessed by the MMSE
  • ASA 3+4
  • Age below 60 years.
  • Missed 3 months of conservative treatment without success
  • The use of steroids and bisphosphonates.
  • Prior radiotherapy to the lower back.
  • Haematologic disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fusion, allograft
Allograft used for fusion in the operation site
i-FACTOR mixed with autologous bone from the decompression placed in the operation site for enhancing fusion
Other Names:
  • i-FACTOR®putty, Cerapedics, USA. CE-brand 0086
Experimental: Fusion, i-FACTOR
i-FACTOR used for fusion in the operation site
i-FACTOR mixed with autologous bone from the decompression placed in the operation site for enhancing fusion
Other Names:
  • i-FACTOR®putty, Cerapedics, USA. CE-brand 0086

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The clinical effect of i-FACTOR® versus allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis operation in the elderly with spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis measured by ODI
Time Frame: 24 months postoperative
24 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The clinical effect of i-FACTOR® versus allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis operation in the elderly with spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis assessed by fusion rates
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
12 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael K Jacobsen, MD, Rygkirurgisk sektor Middelfart

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on i-FACTOR

3
Subscribe