The Effect of Blended Sensor Efficiency on Relieving the Heart's Inability to Increase Its Rate During Exercise (ABSOLVE CI)

April 15, 2017 updated by: Vivek Reddy

The impAct of Blended Sensor Optimization on resoLVing Chronotropic Incompetence: ABSOLVE CI

The goal of this trial is to test the effect/benefit of a FDA approved blended pacemaker sensor which responds only by comparing physical activity, heart rate, and breathing rate; compared to the accelerometer pacemaker sensor which respond only by comparing physical activity and the heart rate in patients whose heart is unable increase its heart rate according to increase physical activity or demand (Chronotropic Incompetence). Only one pacemaker family will be used in this clinical trial whereas the "out of box" configuration is the blended sensor which can also be made to act only as an accelerometer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: The goal of this trial is to test the impact of individualized blended sensor optimization on chronotropic response, compared with accelerometer use alone, in patients with chronotropic incompetence who are planned to undergo permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

Study Population: The study population will consist of patients who suffer from the heart's inability to increase its heart rate according to increased physical activity or demand (chronotropic incompetence). These patients are planned to undergo permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Improvement in chronotropic competence as defined as an increase in age-predicted maximum heart rate (APMHR) which is defined as 220 beats per minute (bpm) minus patient's age in years. Age-predicted heart rate reserve (APMHR) defined as APMHR minus patient's heart rate at rest. Observe the maximal heart rate during exercise test with decrease in oxygen consumption at each stage and also at peak effort.

SECONDARY ENDPOINT:

  1. Quality of life.
  2. Procedural safety as defined by the number of complications within 1week associated with the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Evidence of chronotropic incompetence on exercise or pharmacological stress test defined as the inability to achieve 85% or greater of Age-predicted heart rate reserve (APMHR)
  • Legal status to give informed consent specific to state and national law.
  • Planned for PPM implantation and meets current guidelines for PPM therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Inability to comply with the follow-up visit schedule.
  • Unable to participate in stress testing (exercise or pharmacological).
  • Previous PPM implantation
  • A life expectancy of less than 12 months per physician discretion
  • Enrolled in any concurrent study, without Boston Scientific written approval.
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable chest pain
  • Stroke within 30 days
  • Heart attack within 90 days
  • Stress Test Exclusion Criteria: No evidence of Chronotropic incompetence on exercise or pharmacological stress test, defined as the ability to achieve 85% or greater of APMHR.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Blended Sensor Optimization (BSO)
Patients in this arm will undergo pacemaker placement and will have blended sensor optimization. Minute Ventilation will be optimized/activated

At wound check (POD#1 and 1 Week F/U), histograms from device interrogation obtained from patients in the BSO group are assessed, and these patients undergo optimization. A hall walk and stair climbing exercise will be performed and MV optimized using trending data to hit the following targets:

HR at Rest: 60 HR upon slow walking: 100 HR upon brisk walking: 115-120 HR upon climbing stairs: 130-135 Patients will undergo optimization, and be instructed that their device may have been optimized.

Sham Comparator: Accelerometer Alone (AA)
Patients in this arm will undergo pacemaker implantation but will not have Minute Ventilation Sensor activated. Only accelerometer will remain active
Patients in the AA group will also undergo device interrogation, and will perform a hall walk and stair climbing exercise. Afterwards, these patients will undergo a sham optimization by placing the PPM interrogation laptop device over there pacemaker, and instructing the patients that their device may have been optimized.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changed in Stress Test at 6 Months as Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
An Exercise or Dobumatime Stress Test to be performed to assess primary outcome measure.
baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-02-333-05

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronotropic Incompetence

3
Subscribe