Relative-dose-response Test (RDR) Adaptation for Chronic Liver Disease

July 2, 2012 updated by: Gabriela Villaca Chaves, PhD, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Responsiveness of RDR Test to Assess Hepatic Vitamin A Stores in Chronic Liver Disease

The relative-dose-response test (RDR) is considered to be the most accurate method for evaluating vitamin A nutritional status (VANS) in patients suffering from liver disease, as it infers the reserves of the vitamin in the liver. However, for the RDR test to reflect VANS in patients suffering from chronic liver disease, factors inherent to the disease need to be considered, such as possible malabsorption, advanced age, a drop in synthesis and/or the release of retinol binding protein (RBP), which would result in an inadequate response to the RDR test. Thus, the objective of present study is to assess the adequacy of two different protocol for using the RDR test in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: The sample group was comprised of 178 patients at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University Hospital (111 men) with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease. They were sorted into two groups, according to the retinyl palmitate dosage (1500 IU or 2500 IU) received at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, the investigators took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7). The investigators assessed VANS via concentrations of serum retinol and RBP, as well as by way of the RDR test. The cutoff points the investigators used for denoting inadequacy in the indicators retinol and RDR were, respectively, < 1.05 µmol/L and ≥ 20%. To classify the degrees of severity of the disease the investigators used the criteria established by Child & Pugh (1973).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

178

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 22010050
        • Gabriela Villaça Chaves

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of liver cirrhosis of viral etiology, alcoholic or metabolic action

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malabsorption syndromes
  • moderate or severe infection
  • diabetes mellitus using insulin renal, cardiac or respiratory
  • therapeutic doses of vitamin A in the 6 months prior to data collection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RDR test (1500 UI vitamin A)
81 patients with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease received 1500 UI retinyl palmitate dosage at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, we took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7).
the patients received an oral dose of 1500 IU or 2500 IU, once.
Other Names:
  • vitamin A
Experimental: RDR test (2500 IU vitamin A)
81 patients with several etiologies of liver cirrhosis at different stages in the progression of the disease received 2500 UI retinyl palmitate dosage at T0 (blood sample taken following a 12-hour fast). Following supplementation, we took further blood samples five and seven hours later (T5 and T7).
the patients received an oral dose of 1500 IU or 2500 IU, once.
Other Names:
  • vitamin A

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in retinol status (RDR test) at 5 and/or 7 hour after supplementation
Time Frame: RDR will be calculated for the two intervention groups (1500 or 2500 IU vitamin A), for the two moments of blood sampling, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation.

Therapeutic response is evaluated by means of circulating serum retinol, 5 and 7 hours after the administration of vitamin A. The RDR was calculated by the following formula, using the values of serum retinol in the three times of blood collection (Loerch et al., 1979), expressed in percentages:

RDR (%) = [(A0-Ax) / Ax] x100 where A0 is the serum retinol at time 0 (fasting) and Ax is the serum retinol 5 or 7 h after administration of vitamin A. It was used as the RDR cutoff ≥ 20%, indicating indirect hepatic reserve inadequate

RDR will be calculated for the two intervention groups (1500 or 2500 IU vitamin A), for the two moments of blood sampling, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
serum retinol-binding protein (RBP)
Time Frame: RBP were analyzed at baseline, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation as a variable that explain the appropriate response or failure to respond to the RDR test.
RBP were analyzed at baseline, 5 and 7 hours after supplementation as a variable that explain the appropriate response or failure to respond to the RDR test.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gabriela V Chaves, PhD, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on retinyl palmitate (UNICEF, Melbourne, Australia)

3
Subscribe