- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01644175
Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) Versus Placebo on Top of Lipid-Modifying Therapy in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk and Hypercholesterolemia (ODYSSEY COMBO I)
October 7, 2015 updated by: Sanofi
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAR236553/REGN727 in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Their Lipid-Modifying Therapy
Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9).
Primary Objective of the study:
- To demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by alirocumab as add-on therapy to stable maximally tolerated daily statin therapy with or without other lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) in comparison with placebo after 24 weeks of treatment in high cardiovascular (CV) risk participants with hypercholesterolemia
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of alirocumab in comparison with placebo on LDL-C at other time points
- To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on other lipid parameters
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The maximum study duration was 62 weeks per participant, including a 2-week screening period, 52-week randomized treatment period, and 8-week follow-up period.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
316
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
- Investigational Site Number 840857
-
Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36693
- Investigational Site Number 840891
-
Montgomery, Alabama, United States, 36109
- Investigational Site Number 840876
-
-
Arizona
-
Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85306
- Investigational Site Number 840865
-
-
Arkansas
-
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States, 72401
- Investigational Site Number 840826
-
-
California
-
Burbank, California, United States, 91505
- Investigational Site Number 840870
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90057
- Investigational Site Number 840851
-
Los Gatos, California, United States, 95032
- Investigational Site Number 840845
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95823
- Investigational Site Number 840844
-
San Jose, California, United States, 95116
- Investigational Site Number 840801
-
Tarzana, California, United States, 91356
- Investigational Site Number 840886
-
Torrance, California, United States, 90505
- Investigational Site Number 840862
-
Vista, California, United States, 92083
- Investigational Site Number 840893
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33432
- Investigational Site Number 840867
-
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33472
- Investigational Site Number 840884
-
Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33761
- Investigational Site Number 840836
-
Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33134
- Investigational Site Number 840866
-
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33308-4311
- Investigational Site Number 840895
-
Hialeah, Florida, United States
- Investigational Site Number 840820
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
- Investigational Site Number 840805
-
Oviedo, Florida, United States, 32765
- Investigational Site Number 840811
-
Port Orange, Florida, United States, 32127
- Investigational Site Number 840881
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
- Investigational Site Number 840816
-
-
Georgia
-
Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31904
- Investigational Site Number 840850
-
-
Idaho
-
Eagle, Idaho, United States
- Investigational Site Number 840840
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Investigational Site Number 840842
-
Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
- Investigational Site Number 840898
-
Morton, Illinois, United States, 61550
- Investigational Site Number 840847
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Investigational Site Number 840896
-
Michigan City, Indiana, United States, 46360
- Investigational Site Number 840894
-
Mishawaka, Indiana, United States, 46545
- Investigational Site Number 840838
-
-
Kentucky
-
Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42003
- Investigational Site Number 840823
-
-
Louisiana
-
Eunice, Louisiana, United States, 70535
- Investigational Site Number 840858
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70119
- Investigational Site Number 840802
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Salisbury, Massachusetts, United States, 01952
- Investigational Site Number 840855
-
-
Michigan
-
Battle Creek, Michigan, United States, 49015
- Investigational Site Number 840890
-
Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48034
- Investigational Site Number 840832
-
-
Minnesota
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
- Investigational Site Number 840839
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
- Investigational Site Number 840888
-
-
Mississippi
-
Port Gibson, Mississippi, United States, 39150
- Investigational Site Number 840837
-
-
Missouri
-
Jefferson City, Missouri, United States, 65109
- Investigational Site Number 840814
-
-
Nevada
-
Sparks, Nevada, United States
- Investigational Site Number 840833
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Newington, New Hampshire, United States, 3801
- Investigational Site Number 840817
-
-
New York
-
New Windsor, New York, United States, 12553
- Investigational Site Number 840853
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
- Investigational Site Number 840822
-
-
North Carolina
-
Cary, North Carolina, United States
- Investigational Site Number 840824
-
Smithfield, North Carolina, United States
- Investigational Site Number 840880
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
- Investigational Site Number 840502
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
- Investigational Site Number 840852
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- Investigational Site Number 840846
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45245
- Investigational Site Number 840899
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43231
- Investigational Site Number 840831
-
Kettering, Ohio, United States, 45429
- Investigational Site Number 840860
-
Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States, 44094
- Investigational Site Number 840809
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73069
- Investigational Site Number 840818
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97404
- Investigational Site Number 840812
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Downington, Pennsylvania, United States, 19335
- Investigational Site Number 840803
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
- Investigational Site Number 840869
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15206
- Investigational Site Number 840825
-
-
South Carolina
-
Anderson, South Carolina, United States, 29621
- Investigational Site Number 840872
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29407
- Investigational Site Number 840885
-
Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29651
- Investigational Site Number 840813
-
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
- Investigational Site Number 840827
-
-
Texas
-
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78404
- Investigational Site Number 840868
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77070
- Investigational Site Number 840877
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77072
- Investigational Site Number 840841
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78224
- Investigational Site Number 840830
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Investigational Site Number 840854
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78258
- Investigational Site Number 840883
-
Tomball, Texas, United States, 77375
- Investigational Site Number 840889
-
-
Utah
-
Bountiful, Utah, United States, 84010
- Investigational Site Number 840878
-
Orem, Utah, United States, 84058
- Investigational Site Number 840819
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84102
- Investigational Site Number 840863
-
-
Virginia
-
Manassas, Virginia, United States, 20110
- Investigational Site Number 840804
-
Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
- Investigational Site Number 840882
-
Weber City, Virginia, United States, 24290
- Investigational Site Number 840810
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Participants with hypercholesterolemia and established coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents who were not adequately controlled with a maximally tolerated daily dose of statin with or without other LMT, both at stable dose for at least 4 weeks to 6 weeks prior to screening (Week -2)
Exclusion criteria:
- Age <18 or legal age of adulthood, whichever was greater
- Participants without established CHD or CHD risk equivalent
- LDL-C <70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) and participants with a history of documented cardiovascular disease
- LDL-C <100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) and participants without a history of documented cardiovascular disease
- Not on a stable dose of LMT (including statin) for at least 4 weeks and/or fenofibrate for at least 6 weeks, as applicable, prior to the screening visit (Week -2) and from screening to randomization
- Fasting serum triglycerides > 400 mg/dL (>4.52 mmol/L)
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Q2W
Placebo (for alirocumab) every 2 weeks (Q2W) added to stable Lipid-Modifying Therapy (LMT) for 52 weeks.
|
Statin (rosuvastatin, simvastatin or atorvastatin) at stable dose with or without other LMT as clinically indicated.
Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector (also known as pre-filled pen).
|
|
Experimental: Alirocumab
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8.
|
Statin (rosuvastatin, simvastatin or atorvastatin) at stable dose with or without other LMT as clinically indicated.
Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector (also known as pre-filled pen).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data.
All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection) (on-treatment analysis).
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
|
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data.
All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.
|
Up to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 52 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-treatment Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
|
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection.
|
Up to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model for handling of missing data.
All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.
|
From baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed be robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by a robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 52
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mahmood T, Minnier J, Ito MK, Li QH, Koren A, Kam IW, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. Discordant responses of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) to alirocumab: A pooled analysis from 10 ODYSSEY Phase 3 studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Jul 23;28(8):816-822. doi: 10.1177/2047487320915803. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
- Leiter LA, Tinahones FJ, Karalis DG, Bujas-Bobanovic M, Letierce A, Mandel J, Samuel R, Jones PH. Alirocumab safety in people with and without diabetes mellitus: pooled data from 14 ODYSSEY trials. Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1742-1751. doi: 10.1111/dme.13817. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
- Ray KK, Ginsberg HN, Davidson MH, Pordy R, Bessac L, Minini P, Eckel RH, Cannon CP. Reductions in Atherogenic Lipids and Major Cardiovascular Events: A Pooled Analysis of 10 ODYSSEY Trials Comparing Alirocumab With Control. Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):1931-1943. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024604. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
- Colhoun HM, Robinson JG, Farnier M, Cariou B, Blom D, Kereiakes DJ, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, Chaudhari U. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a fully human PCSK9 monoclonal antibody, in high cardiovascular risk patients with poorly controlled hypercholesterolemia on maximally tolerated doses of statins: rationale and design of the ODYSSEY COMBO I and II trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Sep 20;14:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-121.
- Kereiakes DJ, Robinson JG, Cannon CP, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, Chaudhari U, Colhoun HM. Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab among high cardiovascular risk patients on maximally tolerated statin therapy: The ODYSSEY COMBO I study. Am Heart J. 2015 Jun;169(6):906-915.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 16, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
July 18, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 6, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 7, 2015
Last Verified
October 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EFC11568
- U1111-1121-4356 (Other Identifier: UTN)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypercholesterolemia
-
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and...Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryActive, not recruitingMedication Adherence | Adherence, Medication | Treatment Adherence | Familial Hypercholesterolemia | Motivational Interviewing | Adherence, Patient | Treatment Adherence and Compliance | Patient Compliance | Adherence | Hypercholesterolemia, Familial | Patient Adherence | Hypercholesterolemia, Autosomal Dominant and other conditionsRussian Federation
-
Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere VirgiliRecruitingFamilial Hypercholesterolemia | Familial Hypercholesterolemia - Homozygous | Familial Hypercholesterolemia - HeterozygousSpain
-
Direct PlantesUnknownHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIAFrance
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsNot yet recruitingDyslipidemia, Hypercholesterolemia
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Accuredit Therapeutics US LimitedNot yet recruitingHeterozygous Familial HypercholesterolemiaChina
-
Hangzhou Dinovate Biotech Co., LtdNot yet recruitingPrimary Hypercholesterolemia
-
Addpharma Inc.Not yet recruitingPrimary Hypercholesterolemia
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalRecruitingPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Salubris (Chengdu) Biotechnology Co., Ltd.CompletedHypercholesterolemia and Mixed DyslipidemiaChina
-
Provident Clinical ResearchGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPrimary HypercholesterolemiaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Lipid-Modifying Therapy (LMT)
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolemiaUnited States, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United...
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolemiaUnited States, Spain, Australia, Netherlands, Japan, Jordan, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, South Africa, Canada, Austria, Czechia, France, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Russian Federation, United Kingdom
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolaemiaBelgium, Spain, Germany, Austria, Italy, United States, France, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of, Taiwan
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolaemiaNetherlands, United States, Canada, Russian Federation, South Africa
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolemiaSweden, Germany, Russian Federation, Denmark, Israel, South Africa, Spain, Hungary, United States, Colombia, Czech Republic, Argentina, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Finland, France, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Por... and more
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolemiaUnited States, Austria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHypercholesterolemiaUnited States, Canada, Denmark, France, Hungary, Israel, Korea, Republic of, Russian Federation, South Africa, Ukraine
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedAtherosclerotic Cardiovascular DiseaseChina, Hong Kong, Austria, Bulgaria, Norway, Peru, France, Japan, Spain, Lithuania, Philippines, Israel, Belgium, Croatia, Poland, Hungary, Chile, Mexico, Latvia, Singapore, Switzerland, Colombia, Greece, Ukraine, Turkey, Finland, United States and more