An Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations

July 11, 2019 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AUY922 vs Pemetrexed or Docetaxel in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutations Who Have Progressed on Prior EGFR TKI Treatment

The purpose of this study was to determine if AUY922 had superior efficacy when compared to chemotherapy agents docetaxel or pemetrexed in patients whose tumor had EGFR mutations.

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of AUY922, when administered i.v. on a once-weekly schedule at 70 mg/m2, versus docetaxel or pemetrexed in adult patients with advanced NSCLC, whose tumors harbored EGFR activating mutations, and had developed resistance to EGFR TKI.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Creteil, France, 94000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Villejuif Cedex, France, 94805
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Bouches Du Rhone
      • Marseille cedex 20, Bouches Du Rhone, France, 13915
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • MB
      • Monza, MB, Italy, 20900
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • MI
      • Milano, MI, Italy, 20133
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • PR
      • Parma, PR, Italy, 43100
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • TO
      • Orbassano, TO, Italy, 10043
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tokyo
      • Koto ku, Tokyo, Japan, 135 8550
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Korea
      • Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of, 05505
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Seocho Gu
      • Seoul, Seocho Gu, Korea, Republic of, 06591
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Oslo, Norway, NO-0424
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80 952
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Catalunya
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08035
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 407
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10048
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Taoyuan/ Taiwan ROC
      • Kuei-Shan Chiang, Taoyuan/ Taiwan ROC, Taiwan, 33305
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars Sinai Medical Center Dept.of Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr.
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20850
        • Maryland Oncology Hematology, P.A. SC
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792-6164
        • University of Wisconsin / Paul P. Carbone Comp Cancer Center Univ Wisc 5

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with histologically or cytologically documented, locally advanced (stage IIIB who are not amenable to combined modality treatment) or recurrent or metastatic (Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer.
  2. Patients must have EGFR gene mutation in their tumors. This can be source - documented by one of the following:

    • Provide a pathology report that indicates the patient's tumor had EGFR activating mutation in the past.

    Or:

    • Perform testing (local or central) in an archival tumor or a fresh baseline biopsy tumor tissue to show the presence of EGFR activating mutation.

  3. Patients must have documented clinical benefit (CR, PR, or patients with SD for 6 months or greater) on prior EGFR TKI (e.g. erlotinib or gefitinib) followed by documented progression according to RECIST.
  4. Patients must have received prior platinum containing treatment.
  5. WHO performance status of 0-1

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have received more than two prior lines of antineoplastic therapy for advanced disease. Chemotherapy administered as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment more than six months prior to study enrollment is not considered a prior line of therapy for purposes of this study.
  2. Evidence of spinal cord compression or current evidence of CNS metastases. Screening CT/MRI of the brain is mandatory. Note: Patients who have been treated for CNS metastases by radiation or gamma knife surgery, who been stable for at least 2 months and have discontinued high dose corticosteroids will be eligible for protocol participation
  3. Prior treatment with an HSP90 inhibitor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AUY922 arm

Participants were assigned to one of two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. This was the investigational drug arm.

AUY922 was to be administered weekly.

AUY922 was to be given by i.v. once weekly at 70 mg/m2 until disease progression, death or any other reason for discontinuation from study treatment.
Active Comparator: chemotherapy arm

Participants were assigned to one of two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. This was the control arm drug arm.

Pemetrexed or docetaxel was to be was to be given once every three weeks.

Docetaxel was to be given i.v. once every 3 weeks at 75 mg/m2 until progression or unacceptable toxicity
Other Names:
  • TAXOTERE
Pemetrexed was to be given once every 3 weeks at 500 mg/m2 until progression or unacceptable toxicity
Other Names:
  • ALIMTA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 16 months
Compared PFS between the treatment of AUY922 to comparators Pemetrexed or Docetaxel. Progression-free survival (PFS) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 was the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions
16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 16 months
ORR was to be compared between treatment arms. The ORR was to be based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Per this criteria for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.This outcome measure was originally planned to be analyzed up to 24 months. The DMC recommendation at the IA was to stop the study for futility. As a result, collection of all the efficacy assessments was stopped at that time.
16 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: from randomization until death up to death
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a death has not been observed by the date of analysis cutoff, then OS was to be censored at the last known date patient was alive.
from randomization until death up to death
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Duration of DCR will be compared between treatment arms. The duration of DCR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Time to Response (TRR)
Time Frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
TTR was to compare between treatment arms. The TTR was to be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
The DOR will be compared between treatment arms. The DOR will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Rate of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
To evaluate safety and tolerability of AUY922 compared to chemotherapy agents pemetrexed or docetaxel.
baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Change in Laboratory Paramenters
Time Frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Changes in hematology and chemistry values, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), Dose interruptions, reductions and dose intensity.
baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
Time to Progression (TTP)
Time Frame: baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months
TTP will be compared between treatment arms. The TTP will be based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1
baseline, until disease progression up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Clinical Trials on AUY922

Subscribe