Study of Inupadenant (EOS100850) With Chemotherapy as Second Line Treatment for Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

July 30, 2025 updated by: iTeos Therapeutics

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Inupadenant in Combination With Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Adults With Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Progressed on Immunotherapy

The study will first determine the optimal dose of inupadenant to be given in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed to patients that progressed after receiving first line anti-PD(L)1 treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The efficacy and safety of the combination is then compared to standard of care carboplatin and pemetrexed in the same populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is composed of two parts. Part 1 follows an open-label, dose-finding design where individual cohorts are treated with various dose levels of inupadenant combined with standard of care dosing of carboplatin and pemetrexed. The recommended phase 2 dose is determined prior to initiation of Part 2 which then compares inupadenant to placebo with both arms treated in combination with standard of care carboplatin and pemetrexed.

Participants in both parts are enrolled from two populations of patients with nonsquamous NSCLC that have progressed after first line treatment as follows: non-resectable patients treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by anti-PD-(L)1 or metastatic patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy without chemotherapy.

Imaging, safety and PRO assessments are performed during the treatment and follow-up phase as well as pharmacokinetic and other exploratory analyses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Lucas
      • Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
        • Jessa Ziekenhuis
      • Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
        • AZ Delta
    • Ontario
      • Brampton, Ontario, Canada, L6R 3J7
        • William Osler Health System
      • Praha 3, Czechia, 116401
        • Vseobecna Fakultni Nemocnice
      • Caen, France, 14003
        • CHU de Caen
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • Hopital de la Timone Centre d'Essais Précoces en Cancérologie de Marseille (CEPCM)
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU Nantes
      • Milano, Italy, 20133
        • Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
      • Rozzano, Italy, 20089
        • Gruppo Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Humanitas
      • Badajoz, Spain, 06080
        • Hospital Infanta Cristina (Hospital Universitario de Badajoz)
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
      • Coruña, Spain, 15009
        • Centro Oncologico de Galicia
      • Manresa, Spain, 08243
        • Althaia Hospital
      • Ourense, Spain, 10090
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario De Ourense
      • Pamplona, Spain, 37008
        • Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN)
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
    • Illes Balears
      • Palma De Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain, 07120
        • Hospital Universitari Son Espases
      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States, 72703
        • Highlands Oncology Group
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of metastatic (Stage IV) or locally advanced, unresectable (Stage III) NSCLC of nonsquamous pathology
  • Measurable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1
  • PD-L1 expression status available at or after the time of diagnosis. All levels of expression are eligible.
  • Existing biopsy taken within 4 years prior to entering trial or provide fresh biopsy where safe and feasible
  • At least 12 weeks of treatment with only 1 anti-PD-(L)1 agent (mono or with IO combo) in the metastatic setting, OR at least 12 weeks of anti-PD-(L)1 agent (mono or with IO combo) following CRT in the unresectable, Stage III setting
  • ECOG performance status of 0 to 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases or leptomeningeal disease.
  • EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 mutation.
  • Autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment or immunodeficiency requiring concurrent use of systemic immunosuppressants or corticosteroids
  • Hepatitis B or C infection unless adequately treated with no detectable viral load; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) unless well-controlled disease on therapy.
  • History of life-threatening toxicity related to prior immune therapy
  • Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Lack of agreement to use highly effective method of contraception during treatment and for 6 months after the last administration of chemotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part 1, open label
Inupadenant will be given at one or more dose levels to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).
Adenosine 2a receptor antagonist
Other Names:
  • EOS100850
standard of care chemotherapeutic, alkylating agent
standard of care chemotherapeutic, anti-metabolite
Other Names:
  • Alimta
Experimental: Part 2, active treatment
Treatment with inupadenant combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed
Adenosine 2a receptor antagonist
Other Names:
  • EOS100850
standard of care chemotherapeutic, alkylating agent
standard of care chemotherapeutic, anti-metabolite
Other Names:
  • Alimta
Placebo Comparator: Part 2, placebo
Treatment with matched placebo combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed
standard of care chemotherapeutic, alkylating agent
standard of care chemotherapeutic, anti-metabolite
Other Names:
  • Alimta
matched placebo capsule to inupadenant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose-finding to determine recommended Phase 2 dose
Time Frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities
At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)
Progression-free survival [Efficacy]
Time Frame: From randomization to first-documented radiological progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 24 months.
Time from first dose to the date of first documented radiologic progression per RECIST v1.1 or time of death, whichever comes first
From randomization to first-documented radiological progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 24 months.
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (up to 24 months) plus 30 days follow-up or up to database lock
Incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events, AEs leading to discontinuation, deaths, and clinically significant laboratory abnormalities.
Duration of intervention (up to 24 months) plus 30 days follow-up or up to database lock

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate [Efficacy]
Time Frame: From randomization to first-documented radiological improvement, if applicable, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Proportion of participants with a best overall response of complete (CR) or partial (PR) response as assessed by RECIST v1.1
From randomization to first-documented radiological improvement, if applicable, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Duration of Response [Efficacy]
Time Frame: From first-documented CR or PR to first radiological progression or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Time from first CR or PR to first documented progression or death from any cause, per RECIST v1.1
From first-documented CR or PR to first radiological progression or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Percent Change in Tumor Size [Efficacy]
Time Frame: From randomization to the documented radiological assessment with the smallest tumor size sum, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Change in sum of size of target tumors from baseline, per RECIST v1.1
From randomization to the documented radiological assessment with the smallest tumor size sum, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Disease Control Rate [Efficacy]
Time Frame: From randomization to second-documented radiological CR, PR or SD, if applicable, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Proportion of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) sustained over at least 2 consecutive tumor assessments, per RECIST v1.1
From randomization to second-documented radiological CR, PR or SD, if applicable, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Overall Survival [Efficacy]
Time Frame: From randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.
Time from randomization to date of death due to any cause.
From randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months or up to database lock.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Iteos Clinical Trials, iTeos Belgium SA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic NSCLC - Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on inupadenant

Subscribe