Patient-Partner Stress Management Effects on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Symptoms and Neuroimmune Process

December 6, 2018 updated by: Michael H. Antoni, University of Miami

Patient-Partner Stress Management Effects on CFS Symptoms and Neuroimmune Process

The purpose of this study is to test the effects of a videotelephone-delivered patient-partner dual-focused cognitive behavioral stress management intervention on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) symptoms and related psychosocial and neuroimmune processes in patients diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome. Study tests the hypothesis that videophone-delivered patient-partner cognitive behavioral stress management (T-PP-CBSM) intervention improves patient CFS symptoms relative to a videophone-delivered patient-partner Health Information (PP-T- HI) condition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study tests the effects of a 10-week patient-partner focused videophone-delivered cognitive behavioral stress management intervention (T-PP-CBSM) intervention (relaxation, stress awareness, cognitive restructuring, coping skills training, interpersonal skills training) versus a time-attention-matched 10-week patient-partner based videophone-delivered health information (T-PP-HI) (health behavior education on nutrition, sleep and other factors) in men and women with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and their partners. The study evaluates the effects of T-PP-CBSM vs T-PP-HI on patient CFS symptoms, neuroimmune processes--diurnal cortisol regulation and immune regulation (pro-inflammatory:anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio ([IL-1β + IL-6 + TNF-α]:[IL-13 + IL-10])-and psychosocial functioning at 5 months and 9 months after intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33124
        • Department of Psychology University of Miami

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • men and women diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no partner
  • prior psychiatric treatment for serious psychiatric disorder (e.g., psychosis, suicidality)
  • co-morbidity or medical treatment affecting the immune system
  • lack of fluency in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management
Ten (10) 90-min sessions of T-PP-CBSM
Active Comparator: Health Information
Ten (10) 90-min sessions of Health Information delivered via videophones

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Frequency and Severity of CDC-based CFS Symptoms
Time Frame: baseline and 5 and 9 month post-intervention follow-up
Changes in the average frequency and average severity ratings of CFS symptoms as assessed by the CDC Symptom Inventory. Participants rated the frequency (1: A little of the time to 5: All of the time) and severity (1: Very mild to 5: Very severe) of individual CFS symptoms. Greater units on the scale indicate greater symptom frequency or severity. The outcome measure was calculated as a set of two composite scores: 1) Average Symptom Frequency, reflecting an aggregated average of frequency across all symptoms, and 2) Average Symptom Severity, reflecting an aggregated average of severity across all symptoms. Change scores are expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline scores for average symptom frequency and average symptom severity.
baseline and 5 and 9 month post-intervention follow-up
Changes in a Single Composite Product of Average Frequency and Severity Scores of CDC-based CFS Symptoms
Time Frame: baseline and 5 and 9 months post-intervention follow-up
Changes in the composite product of average frequency and severity scores of CDC-based CFS symptoms assessed by the CDC Symptom Inventory. Participants rated the frequency (1: A little of the time to 5: All of the time) and severity (1: Very mild to 5: Very severe) of individual CFS symptoms. Greater units on the scale indicate greater symptom frequency or severity. The composite outcome measure was calculated as the product of Average Symptom Frequency and Average Symptom Severity. Change scores are expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline scores for the composite product score.
baseline and 5 and 9 months post-intervention follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Neuroimmune Functioning Measured by Change in Averaged (2-day) Di-urnal Slope of Salivary Cortisol.
Time Frame: baseline and 5 and 9 month post-intervention follow-up
Changes in salivary cortisol diurnal pattern is measured to determine changes in neuroimmune function. Salivary cortisol diurnal pattern is computed as the natural log of the average within-day slope of change over the 2-day collection period. This measurement is made at baseline, 5 month follow-up and 9 month follow-up. Outcomes are expressed as change in Cortisol Diurnal Pattern (natural log of average 2-day slope values) and expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline values (using the natural log of average 2-day slope values).
baseline and 5 and 9 month post-intervention follow-up
Changes in Neuroimmune Functioning Measured by Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 months, 9 months
Serum samples were collected to measure the pro-inflammatory cytokines Interleukin (IL)-1a, IL-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-a for neuroimmune function. Units of measure are raw concentration expressed picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Change values are expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline values (using raw values).
Baseline, 5 months, 9 months
Changes in Neuroimmune Functioning Measured by Anti-inflammatory Cytokines
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 months, 9 months
Serum samples were collected to measure the anti-inflammatory cytokines Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-10 for neuroimmune function. Units of measure are raw concentration expressed picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Change values are expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline values (using raw values).
Baseline, 5 months, 9 months
Changes in Neuroimmune Regulation Measured by Ratio of Pro-Inflammatory to Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines
Time Frame: baseline and 5 and 9 months post-intervention follow-up
Serum samples were collected to measure the pro-inflammatory:anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio ([IL-1β + IL-6 + TNF-α]:[IL-13 + IL-10]) for neuroimmune function. These values are expressed as ratios. Change values are expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline values (using ratio values).
baseline and 5 and 9 months post-intervention follow-up
Changes in Psychosocial Functioning
Time Frame: baseline and 5 and 9 month post-intervention follow-up
Changes in psychosocial functioning measured with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, and the subscales of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) for Recreation and Pastimes, and Social Interaction. Greater scores on the PSS indicate greater perceived stress (range: 0-56) and greater scores on the CES-D indicate greater depressive symptoms (range: 0-60). The SIP is divided into 'Social Interaction' and 'Recreation and Pastimes' subscales (ranges: 0-11 and 0-5, respectively), with greater scores indicating greater impact of sickness in the respective domain. Change scores are expressed and calculated as Follow-Up minus Baseline scores.
baseline and 5 and 9 month post-intervention follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Patient-Partner Videotelephone-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management intervention (PP-T-CBSM)

Subscribe