Mental Stress Reduction in Defibrillator Patients

December 15, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Effectiveness of Mental Stress Reduction in Defibrillator Patients

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a 10 week program of Stress Management versus control Patient Education sessions on cardiac responses to mental stress in veterans with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a randomized controlled small clinical trial designed to determine whether a 10-week program of group cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) versus a control "Patient Education" program can improve hemodynamic responses to mental stress testing in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Comparison will be made between groups of heart rate and blood pressure responses to mental arithmetic and anger-recall mental stress, psychometric profiles, arrhythmia frequency and implantable cardioverter defibrillator firings before, immediately and up to 6 months after intervention. If benefit of CBSM is proven, study findings could lead to wider use of stress management programs, with increased life expectancy for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

129

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • Wlliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53295-1000
        • Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >21 years,
  • ICD Implantation,
  • > 3 months following ICD implantation,
  • willingness to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Episodes within prior 3 months of: acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infraction, Coronary Artery By-pass Graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, hospital admission any cause,
  • severe mental illness,
  • life expectancy < 1 year,
  • hyperkalemia,
  • hypokalemia,
  • hypomagnesemia,
  • hypermagnesemia,
  • unwillingness to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management
10 week program of Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) group sessions
10 week program of weekly CBSM therapy group sessions
Active Comparator: Patient Education
10 week program of once weekly Patient Education group sessions
10 week program of "Patient Education" group sessions, involving presentations of educational materials relating to heart disease.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Stress Induced Elevation in "Double Product" by Math Stress Task
Time Frame: Immediate to 6 months post intervention
Maximum Mental Stress induced elevation in "Double Product" , (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress task of mental arithmetic (serial subtraction). Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The math task was applied for 10 minutes, with 10 minutes recovery time. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect.
Immediate to 6 months post intervention
Mental Stress Induced Elevation in Double Product by Math Stress Task
Time Frame: 3 months post intervention
Maximum Mental Stress induced elevation in "Double Product" , DP, (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress tasks of mental arithmetic (serial subtraction). Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The math task was applied for 10 minutes, with 10 minutes recovery time. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect.
3 months post intervention
Mental Stress Induced Elevation in "Double Product" by Anger-recall Task
Time Frame: Immediate to 6 months post intervention
Maximum Mental Stress induced elevation in "Double Product" , (equal to Heart Rate , beats/minute, x Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure, mmHg), following serial heart rate and blood pressure measurements during mental stress of anger-recall task. Heart rate and blood pressure responses were recorded at 2.5 minute intervals before , during, and after each test using a Philips automated blood pressure recording device. The anger-recall test was applied for 25 minutes with 10 minutes monitoring post-test. An average of 3 measurements was taken as baseline prior to stress tasks. Stress induced double product elevations were measured as the difference between baseline and maximal values in units of mmHg.beats/minute. Higher values represent a greater mental stress induced effect, and lower values, a lower effect
Immediate to 6 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State Anger
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention
Psychosocial score of negative mood derived from self-report questionnaires. Scale range was 15-45. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
Immediate post intervention
Tension/Anxiety
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention
Psychometric score by self-report questionnaire Scale range is 3-29. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
Immediate post intervention
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention
Psychometric score from self-report questionnaire Scale range is 2-27. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
Immediate post intervention
Depression/Dejection
Time Frame: 3 months post intervention
Psychometric score from self-report questionnaire Scale range is 9 to 60. Lower values represent better outcome, and higher values represent worse outcome..
3 months post intervention
Low Frequency Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention

Heart Rate Variability measure of cardiac autonomic activity, believed to reflect a combination of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity.

Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Low frequency heart rate variability correlates with cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased parasympathetic activity occur in this study population at high risk for cardiac arrhythmia. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.

6 months post intervention
High Frequency Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
Heart Rate Variability measure of Cardiac Parasympathetic activity. Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Increased High Frequency heart rate variability correlates with increased cardiac parasympathetic activity. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.
6 months post intervention
Low Frequency/High Frequency Ratio of Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
Heart Rate Variability measure of cardiac autonomic activity Data are derived from ambulatory ECG recordings during serial mental stress testing (math and anger-recall tasks) using a General Electric MARS Holter analysis system. Time series are created from beat-to-beat intervals, from which frequency domain measures are calculated. Decreased Low/High Frequency ratio reflects Increased High Frequency heart rate variability which correlates with increased cardiac parasympathetic activity, which may be beneficial in this patient population. Normalized units are used, reflecting percentage of total frequency power.
6 months post intervention
Cardioverter-DefibrillatorTherapies
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
Cardioverter-Defibrillator therapies for treatment of serious ventricular arrhythmia
6 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Douglas Russell, MD PhD, Wlliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anger

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)

3
Subscribe