Efficacy and Safety of MT-9938 for Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Subjects With End-stage Renal Disease Receiving Hemodialysis

January 12, 2022 updated by: Toray Industries, Inc

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Fixed-dose, Parallel-group, Multicenter, Efficacy, and Safety Study of MT-9938 for Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Subjects With End-stage Renal Disease Receiving Hemodialysis

This study is being conducted to investigate the efficacy of MT-9938 compared with placebo after 2 weeks, to continue to evaluate efficacy for an additional 6 weeks, and to explore the effect of a reduction in itching intensity on health-related Quality of Life(QoL) domains, especially those which recent research suggests have a positive correlation with overall survival for this patient group. The study will consist of the following phases: Screening (1 to 2 weeks), Run in (1 week), double-blind Treatment (8 weeks), Washout (1 week) culminating in a Follow-up Visit (1 week after the last dose).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study has been terminated because of insufficient patient recruitment. There were no safety concerns.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Rosedale, New York, United States
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • On stable hemodialysis for at least 3 months
  • Has stable functioning arteriovenous fistula, graft or other venous access
  • Has continued (uncontrolled) uremic pruritus despite standard of care in the institution
  • Has severe pruritus, as determined by a qualifying score of ≥3 on the Itch Severity Score Scale (0 to 4) either day or night during the week prior to Screening Visit
  • Has no known drug addiction to any prescription, nonprescription, herbal or natural drugs, and successfully passes a drug screen test
  • Women and men whose partners are of childbearing potential agree to practice the medically acceptable methods of birth control and agree to continue with the regimen throughout the duration of the study
  • Capable of understanding and responding to the subject questionnaires, understands the purpose and risks of the study, and has given written informed consent
  • Has rated his/her NRS score each day for at least 5 days out of the 7 days of the Run-in Phase
  • Has severe pruritus, as determined by qualifying mean worst NRS score in a day of ≥5 (on 11 point NRS) at the end of the 1-week Run-in Phase

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current, clinically significant medical comorbidities
  • Abnormal liver dysfunction
  • Pruritus attributed mainly to any disease unrelated to kidney disease
  • Calcium x phosphorus product >80 mg2/dL2 or hemoglobin <7 g/dL or parathyroid hormone levels >1000 pg/mL at Screening
  • Received ultraviolet B treatment within 30 days prior to Screening
  • Started or changed psychotropic medication within 14 days prior to Screening
  • Is receiving opioid antagonists or opioid agonists within 7 days prior to Screening and not willing to abstain from these medications during the study.
  • Started or changed medications, creams or emollients including over-the-counter oil bath treatment for relief of pruritus within 7 days prior to Screening
  • Has known hypersensitivity to opioids or the study drug ingredients
  • Is currently participating in an investigational drug or device clinical study or was participating in such a study within 30 days prior to the start of Screening
  • Female subject who is known to be pregnant or nursing
  • Is considered not suitable for inclusion in the study in the opinion of Investigator
  • Has current suicidal ideation with some intent to act or with specific plan and intent or had suicidal behavior at any time in subject's life

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo (2capsules) once daily for 8 weeks
Active Comparator: MT-9938 2.5μg
2.5 μg (2capsules) once daily for 8 weeks
Active Comparator: MT-9938 5μg
5 μg (2capsules) once daily for 8 weeks
Active Comparator: MT-9938 10μg
10 μg (2capsules) once daily for 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Worst-itching 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 week
The subject indicated the number on the line from left (0:no itching) to right (10:worst itch I have ever experienced). Assessments was made twice daily using an electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (ePRO) device from the Screening Visit to the Follow-up Visit (Week 9). The 2 daily assessments was separated by 12 h, at approximately 8 am and at approximately 8 pm. Subjects selected the number that best described the worst itch during the day (assessed at approximately 8 pm) or during the night (assessed at approximately 8 am). The day or night score, whichever was greater, was used to calculate the weekly average score and changes from baseline (average over the Run-in Phase [Days -7 to -1]) score in weekly average at 2, 4 and 8 weeks as specified in the protocol are reported. Amount of change score of plus indicates worsening, and minus indicates improvement.
2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 week
Change From Baseline in Worst-itching Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The subject placed a single vertical mark on the line of a VAS corresponding to degree of itching intensity from left (no itching) to right (worst itch I have ever experienced). The VAS represents a 100 mm line. It consists of 101 selectable regions and the subject's score on the VAS will correspond to the region (0 to 100) selected on the line. Assessments was made twice daily using an ePRO device from the Screening Visit to the Follow-up Visit (Week 9). The 2 daily assessments was separated by 12 h, in the morning at approximately 8 am and in the night at approximately 8 pm. Subjects put a single vertical mark on the line to show the intensity of your worst itching during the day or during the night. The day or night score, whichever was greater, was used to calculate the weekly average score and changes from baseline in weekly average at 2, 4 and 8 weeks as specified in the protocol are reported. Amount of change score of plus indicates worsening, and minus indicates improvement.
2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in Itch Severity Score
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The subject performed an assessment on day and nighttime symptoms of itch and effect of itch on sleep using a 5-point ordinal scale of itchiness (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = Moderate, 3=Severe, 4 = very severe). Assessments was made during each dialysis treatment (3x/week) and recorded on paper from the Screening Visit to the Follow-up Visit (Week 9). Change from Baseline (average over the Run-in Phase [Days -7 to -1]) in Weekly Averages of Itch Severity Score were assessed and score at 2, 4 and 8 weeks as specified in the protocol are reported. Amount of change score of plus indicates worsening, and minus indicates improvement.
2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality Assessment
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The PSQI has a minimum possible score of 0 (better sleep quality) and a maximum possible score of 10 (worse sleep quality). Subjects was asked to rate their sleep experience during the previous week. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) modified assessment was made during the dialysis treatment 1x/week every week and recorded on paper from the Screening Visit to the Follow-up Visit (Week 9).Change from Baseline (the Run-in Phase [Days -7 to -1]) were assessed and score at 2, 4 and 8 weeks as specified in the protocol are reported. Amount of change score of plus indicates worsening, and minus indicates improvement.
2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment (Skindex-10)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The Skindex-10 has a minimum possible score of 0 (itching not bothersome) and a maximum possible score of 60 (itching very bothersome). The Skindex-10 is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the health-related QoL in UP. It is comprised of 10 questions, adopted for pruritus from the Skindex-16, a widely used instrument for a variety of skin disease. Subjects was asked to identify on paper at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 8 (EOT) what has bothered them most during the past week by marking along a scale 0 to 6 boxes from "never bothered" to "always bothered. Change from Baseline (the Run-in Phase [Days -7 to -1]) were assessed. Amount of change score of plus indicates worsening, and minus indicates improvement.
2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The Mean Value in Treatment Satisfaction (Patient's Global Impression of Change )
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

The PGIC has a minimum possible score of 1 (very much improved) and a maximum possible score of 7 (very much worse). Subjects was asked to use a categorical scale with 7 categories to describe their global impression of change (PGIC) with study drug treatment. Subjects recorded their impression of change on paper at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 (EOT).

Although the change from baseline (run-in phase [Days -7 to -1]) was specified as an outcome in this study, it was not calculated because the target enrollment was not met and no meaningful statistical analysis could be expected. Therefore, the mean value of patients at each point is shown instead.

2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment (5-D-Itch Scale)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The 5-D-Itch scale has a minimum possible score of 5 (better) and a maximum possible score of 25 (worse). Subjects was asked to assess QoL by means of the 5D-Itch-Scale at Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 (EOT). The 5D-Itch Scale is a 5-item (duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution) multidimensional measure of pruritus itch. Change from Baseline (the Run-in Phase [Days -7 to -1]) were assessed. Amount of change score of plus indicates worsening, and minus indicates improvement.
2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks
The Number of Patients in Excoriation
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Investigator and/or the designated medically qualified staff assessed the subject's excoriation at Baseline, and weekly thereafter, by completing the subject's answers to the following questions:

Excoriation present? Yes/No If yes, please rate the severity: Mild/Moderate/Severe

Although the change from baseline (run-in phase [Days -7 to -1]) was specified as an outcome in this study, it was not calculated because the target enrollment was not met and no meaningful statistical analysis could be expected. Therefore, the number of patients at each point is shown instead.

2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The number of subjects with at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Please see the adverse event table for specific.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uremic Pruritus

Clinical Trials on Nalfurafine hydrochloride(MT-9938) 2.5μg

3
Subscribe