Confirmatory Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Solution

April 12, 2021 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Confirmatory Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye

The purpose of this study is to verify whether OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution is effective compared with placebo in dry eye patients. OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension will be used as a reference drug.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

209

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kansai Region, Japan
        • Kansai Region
      • Kanto Region, Japan
        • Kanto region
      • Kyushu Region, Japan
        • Kyushu region
      • Tokai Region, Japan
        • Tokai region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Out patient
  2. Subjective complaint of dry eye that has been present for minimum 20 months
  3. Ocular discomfort severity is moderate to severe
  4. Corneal - conjunctival damage is moderate to severe
  5. Unanesthetized Schirmer's test score of 5mm/5minutes or less
  6. Best corrected visual acuity of 0.2 or better in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of anterior segment disease or disorder other than that associated with dry eye
  2. Ocular hypertension patient or glaucoma patient with ophthalmic solution
  3. Anticipated use of any topically-instilled ocular medications or patients who cannot discontinue the use during the study
  4. Anticipated use of contact lens during the study
  5. Patient with punctal plug
  6. Any history of ocular surgery within 12 months
  7. Female patients who are pregnant,possibly pregnant or breast feeding
  8. Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug or procedural medications
  9. Receipt of any investigational product within 4 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution
Instillation, 4 times/day for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • rebamipide
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution 0%
Active Comparator: OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension
Instillation, 4 times/day for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • rebamipide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4

FCS indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the cornea was divided into 5 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-15). 0 is better.

Changes of the FCS score from baseline to the last dose (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) were compared between 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution and placebo by the t-test.

Baseline, Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Lissamine Green Conjunctival Staining (LGCS) Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4

LGCS indicates the damage to the conjunctival epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the conjunctiva was divided into 6 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-18). 0 is better.

The scores and change from baseline at each examination (including LOCF) were compared between 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic solution and placebo ophthalmic solution.

Baseline, Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eiji Murakami, Director of Division Dermatilogicals and Ophtalmolgicals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe