Efficacy Mechanism of N-acetylcysteine in Patients With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

February 8, 2018 updated by: In Kyoon Lyoo, Ewha Womans University

Elucidation of Efficacy Mechanism of N-acetylcysteine in Patients With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An 8-week Multimodal Neuroimaging and Neurocognitive Study

It has been suggested that N-acetylcysteine exerts neuroprotective effects by regulating neurotransmitters and cell signaling pathways. We hypothesize that oral N-acetylcysteine augmentation will help reduce symptoms in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder as well as improve cognitive functions. We also expect that the N-acetylcysteine augmentation will induce change in structural, functional, and neurochemical aspects of the brain.

In this study, we plan to conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled augmentation study with N-acetylcysteine in addition to escitalopram. We will assess the efficacy and safety of the N-acetylcysteine augmentation.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 158-710
        • Ewha Womans University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20-65 year-old male or female
  • Posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosed by SCID-IV
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medication treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder within 2 weeks
  • Neurologic disease (eg., penetrating or open head injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor, cerebrovascular diseases)
  • Any other axis I psychiatric disorder
  • IQ below 80
  • Contraindications to magnetic resosnance imaging (e.g., pacemaker implantation, claustrophobia, etc.)
  • Any psychotropic medication within 2 weeks
  • Unstable medical illness or severe abnormality in laboratory test at screening assessment
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy
  • History of myocardial infarction within 6 months
  • Current diagnosis of duodenal ulcer or asthma
  • Contraindications to drugs used in the study (e.g., epilepsy, uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma, etc.)
  • Allergy or intolerance to the study drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: N-acetylcysteine + Escitalopram
The subjects with posttraumatic stress disorder, treated with N-acetylcysteine in addition to escitalopram
0 - 8 week: 10 mg escitalopram a day + 1200 mg N-acetylcysteine twice a day
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Escitalopram
The subjects with posttraumatic stress disorder, treated with placebo in addition to escitalopram
0 - 8 week: 10 mg escitalopram a day + 1200 mg Placebo twice a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in brain structure, function, and biochemical metabolism, analyzed using the computational approach
Time Frame: Baseline, 8th weeks
Baseline, 8th weeks
Change from baseline in Clinician-administered PTSD scale scores at 4th weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks
Baseline, 4th weeks
Change from baseline in Clinician-administered PTSD scale scores at 8th weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 8th weeks
Baseline, 8th weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Hamilton depression rating scale scores at 4th weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks
Baseline, 4th weeks
Change from baseline in Hamilton depression rating scale scores at 8th weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 8th weeks
Baseline, 8th weeks
Change from baseline in Hamilton anxiety rating scale scores at 4th weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks
Baseline, 4th weeks
Change from baseline in Hamilton anxiety rating scale scores at 8th weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 8th weeks
Baseline, 8th weeks
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 4th weeks
4th weeks
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 8th weeks
8th weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on N-acetylcysteine

Subscribe