Efficacy and Safety of Influenza Vaccine During Sarcoidosis (SARCOVAC)

November 17, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Among Patients Suffering From Sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease of unknown origin that can affect all organs, especially the lungs and mediastinum. Some location of sarcoidosis may require treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressors.Although seasonal influenza vaccination can be recommended in sarcoidosis in some subgroups at risk (respiratory failure, pulmonary fibrosis, age over 65, use of immunosuppressive therapy, etc ...), the investigators presently have no data on the efficacy and safety (absence of adverse reactions) of seasonal influenza vaccination in sarcoidosis.Especially it is not known whether the seasonal influenza vaccine provides the same rate and same type of vaccine response in sarcoidosis patients than in the general population. Similarly, it is unclear whether the vaccine response is modified by the severity of the disease and treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppressors.Based on what is known in systemic lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, which are both inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, the investigators expect at best a 50% vaccine response in patients with sarcoidosis and a 85% vaccination response in healthy controls. The demonstration of a vaccine response could allow reconsidering new vaccine approaches in sarcoidosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Data on vaccination in sarcoidosis are largely insufficient. It is thus unclear whether the vaccine response is modified according to the clinical phenotype of the disease and/or treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. However, sarcoidosis is accompanied by numerous disturbances of the immune system, including a tendency to anergy which may affect the efficacy of the vaccine, especially when the disease is active and severe. In addition, the tolerance of influenza vaccination in patients with sarcoidosis has not been studied yet.The influenza vaccination in sarcoidosis is a common practice among medical specialists who care for patients with sarcoidosis, either internists or lung specialists.. However, the practice of this vaccination is not based on scientific evidence, because there are no data establishing the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination in sarcoidosis.Thus, it is possible that the influenza vaccine is less immunogenic in patients with sarcoidosis than in healthy adults, which may reduce the clinical effectiveness of vaccination. It therefore seems essential to determine the efficacy and safety of this vaccine, which is widely practiced. Poor efficiency could lead to the development of different vaccination strategies, based in particular on the administration of adjuvanted vaccines.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

190

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75004
        • Hotel-Dieu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria for patients:

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65;
  • Signature of informed consent
  • Follow-up : six months following the influenza vaccination at D0
  • Sarcoidosis diagnosed and histologically proven since at least 6 months
  • unchanged treatment of Sarcoidosis for at least 3 months, except for the case of a decrease in doses of corticosteroids and at a stable dose of immunosuppressive drugs
  • Indication for a seasonal influenza vaccination.

Existence of one or more of these clinical situations:

  • pulmonary location (dyspnea, radiological or stage IV pulmonary function tests (PFT) altered with decreased forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume average (FEV) or the diffusion of carbon monoxide (TLCO) below 65% of predicted value;
  • Cardiac impairment confirmed
  • Central nervous system impairment and / or device and confirmed with clinical impact and abnormal imaging and / or electromyogram- Renal impairment (histologically confirmed) responsible for a decrease in creatinine clearance
  • disabling Lupus pernio
  • Sinuso-nasal and / or laryngeal impairment histologically confirmed
  • Disseminated impairment, ie affecting more than four organs
  • Dose of corticosteroids ≥to 10 mg per day of the equivalent of prednisone or the necessity of an immunosuppressive therapy (with the exception of Rituximab) to control sarcoidosis- Existence of an associated metabolic disorder
  • Patients with sarcoidosis and living in a care house
  • Sarcoidosis occurring in health/nursing staff

Inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years
  • Signature of informed consent
  • Lack of underlying disease, especially autoimmune diseases and / or sarcoidosis
  • Follow-up possible during the six months following the influenza vaccination

Exclusion Criteria for all:

  • Hypersensitivity to the active substances, eggs and one of the excipients of the vaccine
  • Acute febrile episode in the week prior to vaccination
  • Count with a documented case of influenza within a week prior to vaccination
  • Infection with HIV HBV or HCV known,
  • Current pregnancy or positive urine pregnancy test
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • History of Guillain-Barré
  • Organ Transplantation
  • Cancer in the last 3 years
  • Other vaccination received within 3 weeks prior to the study vaccine injection
  • Treatment with chemotherapy
  • Transfusion or immunoglobulin administration during the last 3 months
  • Co-morbidity requiring biological therapy that specifically targets B cells (eg rituximab)
  • Patient for which an increase of the treatment is planned in the month following vaccination.
  • Acute infection in the month prior to vaccination
  • non affiliated to a health social security system
  • Participation in another biomedical research for the duration of the study
  • Individuals deprived of freedom by an administrative or court order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient
90 patients suffering from sarcoidosis
Single injection of the vaccine at D0 (0.5mL intra-muscularly or subcutaneous for patient under anticoagulant treatment)
Active Comparator: Volunteer
100 volunteers
Single injection of the vaccine at D0 (0.5mL intra-muscularly or subcutaneous for patient under anticoagulant treatment)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Humoral immunogenicity
Time Frame: 21 days post-vaccination
Humoral immunogenicity of the vaccine will be measured 3 weeks after injection of influenza vaccine (day 21) by comparison of the seroconversion rates between patients with sarcoidosis and the control group of healthy subjects.
21 days post-vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunogenicity
Time Frame: at Day 0, Day 21 and Day 180
Effect of the initial clinical phenotype (including disease activity score) on the seroconversion and seroprotection rates, and the seroconversion factor, at each visit
at Day 0, Day 21 and Day 180
Clinical phenotype
Time Frame: at Day 21 and Day 180
Descriptive study of the evolution of clinical phenotype (eg, severity of illness) after vaccination at D21 and D180
at Day 21 and Day 180
Auto immunity activity
Time Frame: At Day 0, at Day 21 and at 6 months post-vaccination
Comparison of autoantibody levels before and after vaccination (anti-nuclear total, rheumatoid factor, anti-GM1 measured at D0, D21 and D180) in all individuals included in the study.
At Day 0, at Day 21 and at 6 months post-vaccination
Effect of therapy on immunogenicity
Time Frame: at Day 21 and Day 180
Effect of the dose of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapy on the seroconversion and seroprotection rates and seroconversion factor at D21 and D180;
at Day 21 and Day 180
Immunogenicity between groups
Time Frame: at Day 0, Day 21 and Day 180
Comparison of the seroprotection rate and the seroconversion factor between patients with sarcoidosis and the control group of healthy subjects at D21 and D180 post-vaccination.
at Day 0, Day 21 and Day 180
Long term immune response
Time Frame: At 6 months post-vaccination
Comparison of the persistence of the immune response between patients with sarcoidosis and control subjects at D180
At 6 months post-vaccination
Lymphocytes subpopulations analysis
Time Frame: At Day 0 and at 21 days post-vaccination
Comparison between D0 and D21 of the distributions in absolute values and percentages of circulating lymphocyte subpopulations, in particular mucosal "homing" CD4+ lymphocytes, in all individuals included in the study;
At Day 0 and at 21 days post-vaccination
Regulatory T Lymphocytes
Time Frame: At Day 0 and Day 21
Effect of the regulatory T cells titers on the seroconversion and seroprotection rates, and the seroconversion factor at D0
At Day 0 and Day 21
Disease activity evolution
Time Frame: at Day 0, Day 21 and Day 180
Effect of the CD4+-CD103+ T cells + at J0 and its evolution between J0 and J21 days based on the scalability of sarcoidosis evaluated by 1/changes in serum enzyme angiotensin converting, IgG, IgA IgM,; 2/ the comparative pulmonary radiological changes and 3/ the in pulmonary function changes between day 0 and day 180.
at Day 0, Day 21 and Day 180
Other immune response
Time Frame: Between Day 0 to 6 months post-vaccination
Seroprevalence and comparison between D0 and D180 of anti-diphtheria toxin and anti-tetanus toxin in all individuals included.
Between Day 0 to 6 months post-vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Claire Le Jeunne, MD, PhD, Hotel Dieu Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza Vaccine

Clinical Trials on Seasonal influenza vaccine available for the 2012-2013 vaccine campaign

Subscribe