Effect of Infant Formula on Energy Balance (GRO)

November 20, 2019 updated by: Julie A. Mennella, PhD, Monell Chemical Senses Center

Impact of Diet Composition on Energy Balance and Satiety During Infancy

The overarching goal of the research we propose here is to conduct a randomized clinical trial to specify the physiologic and behavioral mechanisms by which infant-formula composition affects all aspects of energy balance and growth during the first years of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a randomized clinical trial of infants whose parents decided to formula feed them; mother-infant dyads will be randomized when infant is 2 weeks of age to one of 2 groups. The groups will differ in the composition of the formula fed to the infant during the first year of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

113

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Monell Chemical Senses Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 week to 3 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. A healthy, term (≥37 and ≤42 week gestation at birth), singleton infant.
  2. Birth weight between 2500 - 4500 grams.
  3. At the time of enrollment, infant must be ≤14 days old (Date of birth=day 0).
  4. Mother must be 18 years or older.
  5. Infant must be consuming a standard cow's milk protein infant formula and have been receiving a standard cow's milk protein infant formula for at least the past 2 days prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Mother had gestational diabetes during pregnancy
  2. Infant has condition requiring infant feedings other than feeding cow milk formula from a bottle.
  3. Infant has major congenital malformations (i.e. cleft palate, hemangiomas, extremity malformation).
  4. Infant has suspected or documented systemic or congenital infections (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, cytomegalovirus).
  5. Infant has evidence of significant cardiac, respiratory, endocrinologic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, or other systemic diseases. For example, infant must not be receiving insulin or growth hormone.
  6. Dyad be the relative (son, daughter, niece, nephew, cousin, aunt, uncle, sibling) of ancillary personnel connected with the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Type of Formula: CMF
Infants are randomized to feed standard cow milk formula during first year of life
infant formula
Other Names:
  • cow milk formula (CMF)
  • protein hydrolysate formula (EHF)
Experimental: Type of Formula: EHF
Infants are randomized to feed extensively hydrolyzed infant formula during first year of life
infant formula
Other Names:
  • cow milk formula (CMF)
  • protein hydrolysate formula (EHF)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Growth, Weight for Length (WLZ) Z Scores
Time Frame: 0.5 to 12.5 months with followup visit at 18.5 mos
At each visit, infants were weighed and measured to monitor normal growth. These anthropometric data were converted to weight-for-length (WLZ) Zscores using World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards. The Z-score expresses the anthropometric value as a number of standard deviations or Z-scores below or above the reference mean value. Normal range for Z score is -2.0 (minimum) to 2.0 (maximum).
0.5 to 12.5 months with followup visit at 18.5 mos
Growth, Weight for Age (WAZ) Z Score
Time Frame: 0.5 to 12.5 months with followup visit at 18.5 mos
At each visit, infants were weighed to monitor normal growth. These anthropometric data were converted to Weight for age Z (WAZ) Z scores using World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards. The Z-score expresses the anthropometric value as a number of standard deviations or Z-scores below or above the reference mean value. Normal range for Z score is -2.0 (minimum) to 2.0 (maximum).
0.5 to 12.5 months with followup visit at 18.5 mos
Growth: Length for Age (LAZ) Z Scores
Time Frame: 0.5 to 12.5 months with followup visit at 18.5 mos
At each visit, infants were measured to monitor normal growth. These anthropometric data were converted to Length for age Z (LAZ) Z scores using World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards. The Z-score expresses the anthropometric value as a number of standard deviations or Z-scores below or above the reference mean value. Normal range for Z score is -2.0 (minimum) to 2.0 (maximum).
0.5 to 12.5 months with followup visit at 18.5 mos
Energy Balance: Energy Intake From Infant Formula and Other Sources
Time Frame: 0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
Energy intake (kcal/day) of infant formula and other sources was determined by three-day weighed bottle intake and records of the infants' intake of any liquid or food other than formula during the three days
0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
Energy Balance: Sleeping Energy Expenditure (SEE)
Time Frame: 0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
Postprandial SEE (kcal/day), a proxy for resting energy expenditure in infant, was measured for a minimum of 30 min by open-circuit, indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart with canopy hood, in a quiet, thermal-neutral room.
0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
Energy Balance: Total Energy Expenditure (TEE)
Time Frame: 0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
TEE (kcal/day) was measured over 7 days at each of the three time points (0.75, 3.5 and12.5 mos) using the doubly labeled water method
0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
Energy Balance: Energy Loss in Stools
Time Frame: 0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos
Stool EL (kcal/day) was determined from 3-day stool collection by bomb calorimetry at each timepoint
0.75, 3.5, 12.5 mos

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feeding Behaviors, Maternal Perceptions
Time Frame: 0.5 months
Maternal perception of infant feeding behavior, using standardized questionnaires (Infant feeding style questionnaire; IFSQ); values ranged from 1 to 5; higher scores reflect more of that feeding style. Only baseline data reported herein.
0.5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jillian Trabulsi, PhD, University of Delaware

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HD072307

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Energy balance measures at 0.75, 3.5 and 12.5 months of age

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Development

Clinical Trials on Type of Formula

Subscribe