Fortified Rice for School Children in Cambodia (FORISCA)

December 16, 2014 updated by: Frank Wieringa, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement

Fortified Rice for School Children in Cambodia: Effects on Micronutrient Status, Growth, Cognition and Health.

Rice fortification has been shown to be safe and effective in improving micronutrient status in many studies around the world. However, most studies have been done in Latin America, Africa and India. There are no studies available from Cambodia. Moreover, there is no data available on whether fortified rice can reduce the prevalence of anemia in school children in Cambodia, nor whether there will be additional benefits, such as better learning capability of school children or fewer days missed due to better health. To inform WFP, Cambodian policy and the public on the potential benefits of fortified rice on health and development for Cambodian school children, an intervention study will be conducted in Kampung Speu province during the 2012 - 2013 school year. The study will be conducted by IRD, PATH and WFP. Sixteen schools will be selected to receive either the normal rice provided by the WFP school meal program, or fortified rice instead of normal rice. Three (3) different types of fortified rice will be tested, to identify the best type of fortified rice. In addition, 4 schools with no school meal program will be selected to serve as control. School attendance and morbidity will be followed in all children in the participating schools over the whole school year. Biochemical indicators of micronutrient status will be determined in a subgroup of children (25% of the children), which requires collection of blood, urine and stool samples.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Micronutrient deficiencies are a major health problem in many developing countries, including Cambodia. Micronutrient deficiency results in poor health, with a much higher risk for mortality in vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and young infants, and delayed physical and cognitive development, resulting in retarded growth and stunting. It thereby prevents children from reaching their full potential as micronutrients play an important role in children's cognitive and motor development.

The UN World Food Program (WFP) provides a daily school meal to ~500,000 school children in Cambodia. The main objective of the school meal program is to increase school attendance. Although the school meal provides salt fortified with iodine, and vegetable oil fortified with vitamin A, the school meal provides an excellent opportunity to improve micronutrient status of school children by providing them with rice fortified with vitamins and minerals such as zinc, vitamin A, iron, folic acid and vitamin B12. This is likely to reduce the prevalence of anemia in school children and improve health and school performance. Anemia is a major problem in school children in Cambodia. A recent study by WFP showed that more than half of the school children were anemic.

Rice fortification has been shown to be safe and effective in improving micronutrient status in many studies. However, most studies have been done in Latin America, Africa and India. There are no studies available from Cambodia, except for an acceptability study of fortified rice conducted by WFP and the Institute of Research for Development (IRD) in 2010 in Kampung Speu. This acceptability study showed that fortified rice has an excellent acceptability among school children, parents and teachers. However, there is no data available on whether fortified rice can reduce the prevalence of anemia in school children in Cambodia, nor whether there will be additional benefits, such as better learning capability of school children or fewer days missed due to better health.

To inform WFP, Cambodian policy and the public on the potential benefits of fortified rice on health and development for Cambodian school children, an intervention study will be conducted in Kampung Speu province during the 2012 - 2013 school year. The study will be conducted by IRD, PATH and WFP. Sixteen (16) schools will be selected to receive either the normal rice provided by the WFP school meal program, or fortified rice instead of normal rice. Three (3) different types of fortified rice will be tested, to identify the best type of fortified rice. In addition, 4 schools with no school meal program will be selected to serve as control. School attendance and morbidity will be followed in all children in the participating schools over the whole school year. Biochemical indicators of micronutrient status will be determined in a subgroup of children (25% of the children), which requires collection of blood, urine and stool samples.

The study will be submitted to the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Health for approval, and the Ethical Review Board of PATH, USA. Furthermore, approval will be obtained from the Ministries of Health, Education and Planning prior to the commencement of the study.

Potential benefits of the study includes the immediate treatment of school children found to have severe anemia (hemoglobin < 70 g/L) and improved health and cognitive development for all children receiving fortified rice. Potential disadvantages and risks of the study include side effects of blood taking in the subgroup of children and the disruption of classes for a few days during the data collection.

If the results of the study show improved health and cognition for school children receiving fortified rice, provision of fortified rice to all 500,000 Cambodian school children taking part in the WFP school meal program in Cambodia could become a priority.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Phnom Penh, Cambodia
        • Department of Fisheries Post-harvest Technologies and Quality Control, Fisheries Administration

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed informed consent by parent / caretaker
  • age between 6 and 14 yrs
  • visiting selected school
  • taking part in school meal program

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any chronic illness affecting growth (such as HIV)
  • no informed consent
  • severe anemia which will require direct treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: no school meal
control group receiving no school meal
Placebo Comparator: normal school meal
school meal without fortified rice, placebo group
Experimental: cold extruded fortified rice
school meal with fortified rice using cold extrusion kernels
Experimental: warm extrusion
school meal with fortified rice using warm extrusion kernels
Experimental: hot extruded
school meal with fortified rice using hot extrusion kernels

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anthropometry
Time Frame: 6 months
Weight, height and skinfold thickness
6 months
Micronutrient status
Time Frame: 6 months
iron, zinc, iodine and vitamin A status using plasma and urine concentrations
6 months
Cognition
Time Frame: 6 months
Raven's colored matrices test and WISC III tests
6 months
absentism
Time Frame: 6 months
days out of class
6 months
morbidity
Time Frame: 6 months
days and number of episodes ill
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parasite infestation
Time Frame: 6 months
number of parasite eggs in stools
6 months
gut inflammation
Time Frame: 6 months
calprotectin concentrations in stool samples
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frank T Wieringa, MD PhD, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FORISCA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Micronutrient Status

Clinical Trials on Fortified rice cold extruded kernel

Subscribe