Use of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Neovascular Glaucoma

February 16, 2022 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

This 52 week study will assess the use of intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) compared to standard of care panretinal photocoagulation.

The investigators hypothesize that the neovascularization of the iris and angle present in neovascular glaucoma will resolve more quickly in eye treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection alone and result in increased comfort and preservation of visual field as compared to current standard of care utilizing pan-retinal photocoagulation. The advantages to intravitreal aflibercept injection use could include resolution of NVI/NVA (neovascularization of the iris/neovascularization of the angle) leading to quicker pain relief and quicker lowering of IOP (intraocular pressure).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The two arms of this study will compare current common practice (initial intravitreal anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) to study treatment (VEGF) injection only) for 52 weeks.

This single center study will consist of 20 patients with NVG. Patients will be randomized to:

  • Group A: A single injection of 2mg (0.05ml) intravitreal aflibercept injection at baseline followed by standard of care laser with observation for a total of 52 weeks.

or

  • Group B: 2mg (0.05ml) intravitreal aflibercept injection at baseline followed by two additional injections at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, then every 8 weeks for a total of 52 weeks.

Clinical assessment will include pain assessment (Universal Pain Scale), best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS), ophthalmic examination, anterior segment assessment including number of clock-hours of NVI/NVA, gonioscopy, anterior segment photography, visual field test (Humphrey SITA- Standard 24-2), optic nerve OCT (Zeiss Cirrus Optic Disc Cube 200x200), macular OCT (Cube scan 512 x 128 and 5 Line Raster), fluorescein angiography (initial iris phase followed by standard retinal angiography), and concurrent medical/ocular medications. Qualitative assessment of neovascularization will be made by the investigator based on comparison to baseline angiography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma (Stage I-II)
  • Individuals who are ages 21-90 years old; male or female of any race
  • Presence of neovascularization of the iris and/or angle
  • At least 90 degrees of "unzipped" anterior chamber angle as noted by gonioscopy. (a "zipped angle is the term used for a drainage angle that is slowly closing due to scar tissue from the neovascularization process)
  • Visual acuity of light perception or better in the study eye
  • Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
  • Provide signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye in the past 3 months.
  • Full PRP in the study eye
  • Prior vitrectomy in the study eye
  • Prior trabeculectomy or other filtration surgery in the study eye
  • Active ocular or periocular infection in the study eye
  • Ocular conditions (Cataract or vitreous hemorrhage) that might require surgery in next 12 months
  • Allergy to fluorescein dye
  • Any past use of systemic anti-VEGF medication
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to study enrollment
  • Stroke within 6 months prior to study enrollment
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Sexually active men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to practice adequate contraception during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aflibercept with Laser
A single injection of 2mg (0.05ml) intravitreal aflibercept injection at baseline followed by standard of care laser with observation for a total of 52 weeks
Details covered in arm description
Other Names:
  • Eylea
Experimental: Aflibercept
2mg (0.05ml) intravitreal aflibercept injection at baseline followed by two additional injections at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, then every 8 weeks for a total of 52 weeks.
Details covered in arm description
Other Names:
  • Eylea

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 year
Assess the safety profile of repeated intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with NVG by evaluating the incidence of adverse events
2 year
Severity of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 year
Assess the safety profile of repeated intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with NVG by evaluating the severity of adverse events
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate and Extent of Resolution of Neovascularization
Time Frame: 1 year
Compare between Groups A and B the Rate and extent of resolution of neovascularization in patients with NVG Stages 1 & 2.
1 year
Intraocular Pressure (mmHg) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Intraocular pressure(mmHg) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry between groups A and B
Baseline
Intraocular Pressure (mmHg) at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Mean intraocular pressure(mmHg) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry between groups A and B
Week 52
Number of Patients Losing > 5 Letters on Visual Acuity in Each Group A and Group B
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Comparison between patients, groups A and B, that lost > 5 letters on visual acuity
Baseline to Week 52
Number of Patients in Each, Group A and Group B, Gaining > 5 Letters on Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Comparison of patients in each, group A and group B, that gained > 5 letters on visual acuity
Baseline to Week 52
Visual Acuity at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Comparison of visual acuity between groups A and B
Baseline
Visual Acuity at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Comparison of visual acuity at Week 52 between groups A and B
Week 52
Comparison of the Visual Field Between Groups
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of the Visual field s measured by HVF 24-2 SITA Standards between groups A and B
1 year
Measure of the Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT) Outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
Evaluation of the Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT) outcomes (average retinal nerve fiber layer(RNFL) and central macular thickness), Compared between groups A and B.
Baseline to Week 52
Number of Patients With Need for Surgical Intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison between groups A and B and the need for surgical intervention in both arms during the follow-up period
1 year
Number of Participants With Need for Additional IOP Lowering Medications
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison between groups A and B for the need of additional IOP lowering medications
1 year
Extent of Resolution of Neovascularization Between Groups
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison of groups A and B and the extent of resolution of neovascularization in patients with NVG Stages 1 & 2
1 year
Evaluation of the Average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL)
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparison between groups A and B of the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) as measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neovascular Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Aflibercept

Subscribe