Nerve Transfer After Spinal Cord Injuries

March 21, 2023 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Restoring Hand Function Using Nerve Transfers in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

Nerve Transfer surgery can provide improved hand function following cervical spinal cord injuries

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Current treatment strategies of acute cervical spinal cord injuries remain limited. Treatment options that provide meaningful improvements in patient quality of life and long-term functional independence will provide a significant public health impact.

Specific Aim: Measure the efficacy of nerve transfer surgery in the treatment of patients with complete cervical spinal cord injuries with no hand function. Optimize the efficiency of nerve transfer surgery by evaluating patient outcomes in relation to patient selection and optimal timing the the surgery.

Hypothesis: Peripheral nerve transfers in patients with spinal cord injuries will improve hand function and provide improvement in patient quality of life and functional independence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18-65 years of age
  2. Informed Consent Document (ICD) signed by patient
  3. Cervical spinal cord injury resulting in arm & hand functional impairment, with at least preserved elbow function
  4. International Classification of Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia (ICSHT) category 0 - 4
  5. Patients with a stable American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade of A, B, or C, or with a diagnosis of central cord syndrome, showing minimal to no evidence of functional improvement in motor examination after at least 6 months of non-operative therapy post-injury
  6. Appropriate candidate for nerve transfer study
  7. Willing and able to comply with the study protocol
  8. < 48 months from injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active infection at the operative site or systemic infection
  2. Any return or ongoing clinical recovery of distal motor function within 6 months after injury
  3. Physically or mentally compromised
  4. Currently undergoing long-term steroid therapy
  5. Significant joint contractures and/or limitations in passive range of motion in the arm or hand
  6. Active malignancy
  7. Systemic disease that would affect the patient's welfare or the research study
  8. Pregnant
  9. Immunologically suppressed or immunocompromised
  10. Significant pain or hypersensitivity
  11. Previous or current injury preventing use of tendon transfers to restore upper extremity function
  12. Affective disorder of a degree that would make outcome assessment and study participation difficult
  13. History of brachial plexus injury or systemic neuropathic process

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nerve Transfer
Surgical - Nerve transfers for patients with stable cervical spinal cord injuries
A nerve transfer procedure will be individualized to each patient's functional deficit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in upper motor strength
Time Frame: 48 months
Patients motor strength will be assessed over 48 months of clinical follow-up with conventional manual motor testing
48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores
Time Frame: 48 months
The change in DASH scores will be followed over time and assessed pre-operatively, 6,12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months post-operatively.
48 months
Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores
Time Frame: 48 months
The change in SF-36 scores will be followed over time and assessed pre-operatively, 6, 12, 18, 24. 36 and 48 months post-operatively.
48 months
Change in Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: 48 months
The change in MHQ will be followed over time and assessed pre-operatively, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months post-operatively.
48 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of Intraoperative and Post-operative complications
Time Frame: 48 months
The number of complications within and after the operation.
48 months
Effect of timing on surgical intervention
Time Frame: 48 months
Assess the effect of timing on primary and secondary outcome measures, early (<12 months) vs. (>12 months)
48 months
Rate of reoperation
Time Frame: 48 months
The rate at which a patient needs to be operated on again.
48 months
Hand Function, measured by the Sollerman Hand Function Test
Time Frame: 48 months
The Sollerman Hand Function Test is performed as part of an overall evaluation and assessment by study team Occupational Therapist pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months. 36 months and 48 months
48 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Nerve Transfer

Subscribe