Safety and Efficacy Study of BondEase to Treat Traumatic Lacerations and Surgical Incisions

November 17, 2016 updated by: OptMed, Inc.

A Multi-Center, Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Study of the Safety and Efficacy of BondEase™ Topical Skin Adhesive for the Closure of Traumatic Lacerations and Surgical Incisions

To demonstrate that BondEase™ and conventional wound closure devices (CWCD) are the same in terms of cosmesis (appearance) of the repaired wound when these devices are used for closure of surgical and traumatic wounds .

To demonstrate safety of BondEase™.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a two-phase, multi-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study, in which a total of 153 subjects (102 in the BondEase™ group and 51 in the CWCD group) with traumatic lacerations and incisions will be enrolled. Overall, eligible subjects will be randomized in a pre-defined 2:1 ratio to BondEase™ skin adhesive or CWCD.

In Part 1 of the study 30 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (BondEase™ : CWCD). This part of the study is designed to assess the feasibility and validate use of the device. Pediatric subjects younger than age 18 will not be included in this part of the trial. The results from these 30 subjects will be compiled and submitted to FDA for review and approval prior to proceeding with Part 2. Part 2 of the study will only be initiated after FDA indicates it is acceptable to begin. In Part 2 of the study a total of 123 subjects will be randomized, of which 82 subjects will be randomized to the BondEase™ group and 41 subjects to the CWCD group. This will result in 102 subjects in the BondEase™ group and 51 subjects in the CWCD group across the both parts of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

162

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Orlando Regional Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Maryland
      • Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
        • DC Cosmetics
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Albany Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10075
        • Sadick Research Group
    • North Carolina
      • Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female subjects at least 1 year of age (for Part 2 only) or at least 18 years of age (for both Part 1 and Part 2).
  2. Has a wound requiring surgical repair, where the use of a tissue adhesive is appropriate
  3. Is in good general health
  4. Subject or the guardian understands and is willing to sign informed consent prior to study entry and agrees to be available for the Day 10, Day 28, and Day 90 (Part 1/pilot phase only) follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant or multiple traumas
  2. Known peripheral vascular disease
  3. Known diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2
  4. Known blood clotting disorder
  5. Patient or family history of keloid formation or hypertrophy
  6. Known HIV seropositivity or is immunocompromised
  7. Been treated with an investigational drug or medical device in the past 30 days
  8. A hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the components of BondEase™
  9. Known pre-operative systemic or local infection
  10. Any other diseases or conditions which might interfere with the wound healing process
  11. The wound to be treated with the test device may not have any of the following characteristics:

    • A "burst" or stellate laceration
    • Heavily contaminated (Contaminated Wound: wounds that are grossly contaminated with foreign material requiring extensive cleansing.
    • Human or animal bite
    • Decubitus etiology
    • Evidence of active infection or gangrene
    • On mucosal surfaces or across mucocutaneous junctions (e.g., oral cavity, lips)
    • On an area which may be regularly exposed to body fluids or with dense natural hair, (e.g., scalp)
    • Under tension or over a joint

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: BondEase
Topical Skin Adhesive
topical skin adhesive
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: CWCD
Conventional Wound Closure Devices (CWCD) including: sutures, staples, or adhesive strips
traditional closure methods of sutures, staples or adhesive strips

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
100% Wound Apposition at 10 Days
Time Frame: 10 days
Percentage of subjects in whom 100% wound edge apposition is achieved at 10 days (±3 days) post-procedure.
10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal Cosmetic Outcome at 28 Days (Score of 6)
Time Frame: 28 days

Incidence of wounds with an optimal cosmetic outcome (score of 6) at 28 days.

One point was scored for the absence of, and no point was scored for the presence of, any of the following six items:

  • Stepoff of borders (edges not on the same plane)
  • Contour irregularities (wrinkled skin near wound)
  • Margin separation (gap between sides)
  • Edge inversion (wound not properly everted)
  • Excessive distortion (swelling or edema or infection)
  • Poor overall appearance.

The overall cosmesis score was determined by adding the scores of each individual item. An overall score of six was considered an optimal score outcome. Any score below six was considered suboptimal.

28 days
≥ 50% Wound Apposition at 10 Days
Time Frame: 10 days
Incidence of wounds ≥50% apposed (10 ± 3 days)
10 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Dehiscence Requiring Treatment
Time Frame: 28 Days and 90 days
Wound dehiscence requiring treatment; i.e., need for supplemental closure due to dehiscence at any time, from closure through follow-up
28 Days and 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PD-100-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Lacerations or Surgical Incisions

3
Subscribe