Reduction of Pain Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

October 31, 2012 updated by: Achal Khanna, Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust

Reduction of Pain Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shoulder tip and abdominal pain following laparoscopic procedures are well recognized as causes of post-operative morbidity. This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial attempts to reduce post-operative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery by implementing a simple intra-operative technique.

Patients who undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be recruited to the trial. Patients will be randomized to either the current standard (control group) or to receive an intervention to remove residual CO2. In the intervention group the pneumo-peritoneum will be removed, at the end of the operation, by placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position and utilising a pulmonary recruitment maneuver consisting of two manual inflations to a maximum pressure of 60 cm H2O. In the control group residual pneumo-peritoneum will be evacuated at the end of the procedure by passive decompression via the open operative ports.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This trial recruited 76 randomly assigned patients, 37 in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. The overall post-surgery pain scores, as analysed by two-way ANOVA, were significantly lower in the intervention group (P=0.0019). On Bonferroni post-tests both 12 hour (P<0.01) and 24-hour (P<0.01) pain scores were significantly lower in the intervention group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Northamptonshire
      • Northampton, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom, NN15BD
        • Northampton General Hopsital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients were recruited from a single Consultant's surgical clinic at the same District General Hospital between August 2010 and February 2012. This study was approved by the local ethics committee (National Research Ethics Service REC ref: 09/H0405/65) and informed consent was obtained from all patients after they had the opportunity to study information leaflets that were also given to them. The trial was designed as a prospectively randomized and double blind trial with a 1:1 (control:intervention) allocation.

The inclusion criteria was all adults with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grade 1 or 2, who were undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair performed as a transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAP). All procedures and data collection occurred at a District General Hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

The pre-operative exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 years, those who refused to give consent, those that had an inability to understand the research questionnaire and pregnancy. Patients who were found to require additional procedures, for example a conversion to open surgery, were excluded from the study prior to randomization.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: intervention
In the intervention group, in addition to the above, the patient was placed in the Trendelenburg position (30°) and a pulmonary recruitment maneuver utilized, consisting of two manual inflations to a maximum pressure of 60 cm H2O. This was performed by the Anaesthetist, who held each positive pressure inflation for five seconds, with the valves on the operative ports fully open.
The patient was placed in the Trendelenburg position (30°) and two manual lung inflations to a maximum pressure of 60 cm H2O for five seconds, with the valves on the operative ports fully open.
Other Names:
  • pulmonary recruitment maneouvre
NO_INTERVENTION: control arm
In the control group residual carbon dioxide pneumo-peritoneum was evacuated at the end of the procedure by passively allowing the abdomen to decompress by opening the operative ports.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain scores at varying time points pot operatively
Time Frame: 48 hours
Pain scores were assessed by the use of a validated visual analogue score (whereby '0' was equivalent to 'no pain' and '10' equivalent to the worst 'conceivable pain.')
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Achal Khanna, MRCSEd, Northampton General Hospital Northampton England

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 2, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-operative Pain

Clinical Trials on intervention

Subscribe