Management of Mineral and Bone Disease in Hemodialysis-Calcitriol vs. Paricalcitol (ECRIP)

October 31, 2023 updated by: Winthrop University Hospital

A Randomized, Prospective, Cross-Over Study of Calcitriol vs. Paricalcitol in the Treatment of Mineral and Bone Disease in Hemodialysis Patients

The purpose of this non-inferiority study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of a mineral and bone disease treatment protocol based on calcitriol to one based on paricalcitol in hemodialysis patients using revised Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) parathyroid hormone targets.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Active vitamin D analogs have been the mainstay of treatment for patients on hemodialysis with mineral and bone disease (MBD) for the past decade. Intravenous calcitriol is an active vitamin D analog which is nearly identical to natural 1, 25 Vitamin D3. Calcitriol results from the hydroxylation of previtamin D3 in the liver and kidney. Paricalcitol, 19-nor-1 , 25-dihydroxyvitamin D2, is a newer agent vitamin D analog. This agent is believed to have an effect more specific to the parathyroid gland, and less specific to absorption of calcium and phosphorus from the gut. Although both formulations appear equally effective in suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH), studies have suggested a greater calcemic effect with intravenous calcitriol as compared to paricalcitol (1). Due to this, paricalcitol is the predominant active vitamin D analog used in hemodialysis patients in the United States. Two recent changes in the management of hemodialysis patients will likely reduce the amount of active vitamin D analogs used in the near future: the liberalization of PTH goals according to international guidelines, (2) and the implementation of bundled payments for dialysis by Medicare. These changes challenge previous studies that have analyzed the safety and efficacy of these medications. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, cross-over study will be to determine whether calcitriol is as safe and effective as paricalcitol in the treatment of MBD in hemodialysis patients using the revised KDIGO parathyroid hormone targets. Our hypothesis is that calcitriol will be as equally safe and effective as paricalcitol in the treatment of MBD in hemodialysis patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Mineola, New York, United States, 11501
        • Winthrop University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- All subjects will have been treated for at least three months on hemodialysis with IV paricalcitol. These subjects must have a most recent calcium level within the normal range, most recent phosphorus level < 8 mg/dL and a most recent PTH between 130-585 pg/mL

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if:

  1. age greater than 18
  2. active malignancy
  3. expected survival greater than 6 months
  4. high likelihood of renal transplant during the study period.
  5. Low calcium bath
  6. prior parathyroidectomy
  7. use of calcimimetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Calcitriol, then Paricalcitol
Patients randomized to an active vitamin D treatment protocol based on IV calcitriol. After 14 weeks, patients cross-over to an active vitamin D protocol based on IV paricalcitol for 14 weeks.
3 times weekly
Other Names:
  • Calcijex®
3 times weekly
Other Names:
  • Zemplar®
Active Comparator: Paricalcitol, then Calcitriol
Patients randomized to an active vitamin D treatment protocol based on IV paricalcitol. After 14 weeks, patients cross-over to an active vitamin D protocol based on IV calcitriol for 14 weeks.
3 times weekly
Other Names:
  • Calcijex®
3 times weekly
Other Names:
  • Zemplar®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6
Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6
PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6
Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6
Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6
Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6
Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Up to Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shayan Shirazian, MD, Winthrop University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

November 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Clinical Trials on Calcitriol

3
Subscribe