- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01726907
A Prospective Comparison of Robotic and Endoscopic SMG Resection Via Retroauricular Approach
Traditional transcervical incision of the upper neck is a safe and effective approach for resection of the submandibular gland (SMG). However, external scar at the highly visible area may be a burden for the patients and sometimes may lead to disfiguring hypertrophic scar or keloid. Recently, the investigators reported our surgical technique of 'endoscope-assisted' and 'robot-assisted' SMG resection, which was feasible and showed excellent cosmetic outcomes since the scar was hidden by the auricle and hair. In our previous feasibility study of robot-assisted SMG resection, the investigators proposed that robot-assisted technique may overcome the limitations of endoscopic instruments with rigid and straight nature without articulation and surgical view of two-dimension. In addition, the ergonomically designed operating system was more convenient for the surgeon considering the frequent collision of the endoscopic instruments and reversed hand-eye coordination in endoscope-assisted surgery. However, clinical trial comparing the surgical outcomes of the two techniques has not been reported in the literature.
In this study, the investigators made a prospective comparative study of robot-assisted versus endoscope-assisted SMG resection to determine whether robot-assisted technique has benefits regarding early surgical outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
- epartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed as pleomorphic adenoma or chronic sialadenitis from preoperative ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Past history of neck surgery or radiation
- Possible malignancy expected from FNAB or image study
- Gland with severe adhesion to surrounding tissue on preoperative physical examination
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Robotic SMG resection
Robot-assisted SMG resection
|
The surgical procedure and the considerations for surrounding neurovascular structures were similar to that of the endoscope-assisted SMG resection.
The da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) including a 30° dual channel endoscopic arm and two instrument arms was introduced.
The SMG was retracted using the 5-mm Maryland forceps on the left and the dissection was conducted using a 5-mm spatula monopolar cautery or a Harmonic curved shears on the right.
A Yankauer suction handled by a bed-side assistant could be used for counter traction of the gland which facilitated the dissection procedure.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Endoscopic SMG resection
Endoscope-assisted SMG resection
|
An assistant held a 10-mm 30° rigid endoscope allowing the operating surgeon to use both hands.
Surgical resection tools such as dissector and Harmonic scalpel (Harmonic Ace 23E®; Johnson & Johnson Medical, Cincinnati, OH, USA) was held in the right hand and a Yankauer suction or a Debakey forcep was held on the left for traction of the SMG.
The dissection plane between the capsule of the SMG was conducted under magnified endoscopic view using the the blade of the Harmonic scalpel and the endoscopic dissector.
Routine identification of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve was unnecessary in SMG resection, since the dissection plane was always deep to the middle layer of the deep cervical fascia which includes the fascia of the gland.
The Wharton's duct, facial artery and vein were ligated using the Harmonic scalpel or vascular clip.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
length of incision
Time Frame: expected average opeartion time : 60~90 minutes
|
length of incision is measure by a surgical ruler after before skin incision
|
expected average opeartion time : 60~90 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
amount and duration of drainage
Time Frame: on the day of discharge from hospital (expected average period : postoperative 3 days)
|
duration of drainage, hospital stay and complications are measured on the day of discharge by the charge doctor
|
on the day of discharge from hospital (expected average period : postoperative 3 days)
|
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: on the day of discharge from hospital (expected average period : postoperative 3 days)
|
on the day of discharge from hospital (expected average period : postoperative 3 days)
|
|
|
complications
Time Frame: on the day of discharge from hospital (expected average period : postoperative 3 days)
|
on the day of discharge from hospital (expected average period : postoperative 3 days)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
size of the tumor and SMG
Time Frame: expected average time : 1 week after surgery
|
size of the tumor and SMG is measure by the pathologist
|
expected average time : 1 week after surgery
|
|
cosmetic satisfaction score
Time Frame: 2 months after surgery
|
cosmetic satisfaction score is evaluated at the out-patient department during follow up using the questionnaire with scale of 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied)
|
2 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 4-2011-0819
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on SMG Resection in Comparison to Endoscopic SMG Resection
-
Western Sydney Local Health DistrictCompletedEndoscopic Mucosal Resection | Delayed Bleeding Post EMR | Large Laterally Spreading Lesion in the ColonAustralia
Clinical Trials on Robotic SMG resection
-
Fudan UniversityCompleted
-
University of California, IrvineUniversity of LeedsCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongUnknownAdenocarcinoma | Rectal CancerHong Kong
-
Binh Dan HospitalCompleted
-
Taiyuan LiCompletedRectal Neoplasms | Robotic Surgery | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery
-
JIANG Zhi-WeiCompletedGastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of StomachChina
-
Zhejiang UniversityRecruitingLiver Diseases | SurgeryChina
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Not yet recruiting
-
Hospital General Universitario de AlicanteNot yet recruitingPancreatic Diseases | Robotic Surgical Procedures
-
Xu jianminRecruitingColorectal Liver MetastasisChina