Icotinib at Different Doses in Second-line Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Wild Type EGFR

An Open-label,Randomized,Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy for Icotinib at Different Doses in Second-line Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Wild Type EGFR

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of icotinib at routine dose and higher dose as second-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor of wild type.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300060

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent or progressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer stage IV or IIIB patients with Histologic or cytologic confirmation.
  • Wild type epidermal growth factor receptor status.
  • Progressed after first-line chemotherapy.
  • No previous systemic anticancer therapy.
  • Measurable lesion according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with at least one measurable lesion not previously irradiated.
  • Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of clinically active Interstitial Lung Diseases (Patients with chronic, stable, radiographic changes who are asymptomatic need not be excluded).
  • Positive epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.
  • Known severe hypersensitivity to icotinib or any of the excipients of this product.
  • Evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the subject to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Icotinib of routine dose
Icotinib: 125mg, oral administration, three times per day.
Icotinib: 125mg, oral administration, three times per day.
Other Names:
  • BPI-2009
  • Conmana
EXPERIMENTAL: Icotinib of high dose
Icotinib: 375mg, oral administration, three times per day.
Icotinib: 375mg, oral administration, three times per day.
Other Names:
  • BPI-2009
  • Conmana

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of participants with an objective response. An objective response (OR) was defined as a patient having a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, confirmed at least 28 days following the date of the initial response.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 3 months
Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of first documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
3 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 14 months
Overall Survival was assessed via calculation of the time to death due to any cause. If a participant was known to have died, the time to death was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Otherwise, a participant was censored at the last date they were known to be alive.
14 months
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
Time Frame: 18 months
Adverse events, Serious adverse events , incidence of and reason for study drug dose interruptions and discontinuations, laboratory assessments, vital signs.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Changli Wang, M.D., Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Icotinib of routine dose

Subscribe