High Dose Versus Routine Dose Icotinib in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Stable Disease

May 21, 2015 updated by: Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

High Dose Versus Routine Dose Icotinib in Pretreated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Stable Disease: a Phase II Randomized Study

We hypothesize that higher dose icotinib is related with better efficacy. The primary objective is to compare the progression-free survival of higher dose and routine dose of icotinib in treating pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with stable disease after 8-week routine dose icotinib treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiaotong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV lung cancer(exclude patients confirmed by sputum cytology);
  • Pretreated with at least 1 platinum-based chemotherapy;
  • No previous targeted treatment such as gefitinib, erlotinib;
  • With a measurable disease(longest diameters >=10mm with Spiral computed tomography (CT)and >=20mm with conventional CT) according to RECIST Criteria;
  • WHO performance status(PS)<= 2;
  • Adequate organ functions;
  • Signed and dated informed consent before the start of specific protocol procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to icotinib;
  • Patients with metastatic brain tumors with symptoms;
  • Experience of Anti-EGFR(the epidermal growth factor receptor) Monoclonal Antibody or small molecular compounds therapy such as gefitinib, erlotinib or Cetuximab;
  • Severe systemic disease out of control such as unstable or uncompensated respiratory,cardiac,liver,renal diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Higher dose icotinib
Patients with stable disease after 8-week routine dose icotinib treatment, are randomly assigned to higher dose icotinib group to receive icotinib with a dose of 375 mg three times per day, till progressive disease or unaccepted toxicity.
After 8-week induction of icotinib with a dose of 125 mg three times daily, icotinib is administered 375 mg three times per day.
Other Names:
  • Commana
Active Comparator: Routine dose icotinib
Patients with stable disease after 8-week routine dose icotinib treatment, are administered with icotinib with a dose of 125 mg three times per day, till progressive disease or unaccepted toxicity.
Icotinib is administered 125 mg three times daily.
Other Names:
  • Commana

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 5 months
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Response rate assessed using the RECIST criteria
Time Frame: 2 months
2 months
The number of patients who suffered adverse events
Time Frame: 30 months
Adverse events are assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0
30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Higher dose icotinib

3
Subscribe