Comprehensive vs. Assisted Management of Mood and Pain Symptoms (CAMMPS)

March 12, 2019 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Comprehensive vs. Assisted Management of Mood and Pain Symptoms (CAMMPS) Trial

Pain is the most common presenting symptom in medical outpatients, and depression and anxiety are the two most common mental disorders. All three conditions are often inadequately treated and result in substantial disability, reduced health-related quality of life, and increased health care costs and utilization. Additionally, pain, anxiety, and depression (PAD) are frequently comorbid with one another and have reciprocal negative effects on treatment response and additive effects on adverse health outcomes. The PAD triad is especially burdensome in Veterans, with their high prevalence of chronic pain, depression, PTSD, and other anxiety disorders. The Comprehensive vs. Assisted Management of Mood and Physical Symptoms (CAMMPS) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial designed to test the relative effectiveness of a lower-resource vs. a higher-resource enhancement of usual primary care in the management of Veterans suffering from with pain plus comorbid anxiety and/or depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Comprehensive vs. Assisted Management of Mood and Physical Symptoms (CAMMPS) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial designed to test the relative effectiveness of a lower-resource vs. a higher-resource enhancement of usual primary care in the management of Veterans suffering from with pain plus comorbid anxiety and/or depression.

This is a single-site study enrolling Veterans. Patients followed in primary care clinics at the Roudebush VAMC will be eligible if they have clinically significant levels of pain plus comorbid anxiety and/or depression. A total of 300 eligible patients who provide informed consent will be randomized to one of two treatment arms. One group (n=150) will receive assisted symptom management (ASM) consisting of automated symptom monitoring by interactive voice recording or Internet and prompted pain self-management guided by symptom levels. The second group (n=150) will receive comprehensive symptom management (CSM) which combines ASM with optimized medication management delivered by a nurse-physician specialist team and facilitated mental health care. This team will partner with both VA primary care physicians and psychologists embedded in primary care to monitor and adjust treatments using evidence-based analgesic and antidepressant algorithms, reinforced self-management, and care coordination. The investigators postulate that although both interventions are likely to be beneficial, CSM will be superior to ASM.

In short, this trial compares: 1) usual care plus assisted symptom management (ASM) vs. 2) usual care plus ASM plus optimized medication and care management and facilitated mental health care (CSM). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome is a composite pain-anxiety-depression severity score. Secondary outcomes include individual pain, anxiety, and depression scores; functional status and health-related quality of life; treatment satisfaction; and perceived barriers and facilitators of the CSM and ASM interventions. The rationale for ASM is preliminary evidence of its effectiveness and its lower use of resources. The rationale for CSM is that the addition of optimized medication management, facilitated mental health care, and coordination with both primary care physicians/Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs) and psychologists for the PAD symptoms should substantially enhance the benefits of ASM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

296

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2884
        • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Individuals must be patients of the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana Individuals will be eligible if they have pain plus comorbid anxiety and/or depression.

  • Pain must:

    • be musculoskeletal, either localized (in the arms, legs, back, or neck) or widespread (fibromyalgia)
    • have persisted 3 months or longer despite a trial of at least one analgesic medication
    • at least moderate in severity, defined as a Brief Pain Inventory average severity score of 5 or greater
  • Depression must be of at least moderate severity, defined as a PHQ-8 score of 10 or greater with either depressed mood and/or anhedonia being endorsed, OR
  • Anxiety must be of at least moderate severity, defined as a GAD-7 score of 10 or greater, OR
  • A composite mood score (anxiety and depression) of sufficient severity, defined as a GAD-7 + PHQ-8 score of 12 or greater.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals will be excluded if they:

  • do not speak English
  • have moderately severe cognitive impairment as defined by a validated 6-item cognitive screener
  • have schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychosis
  • have other severe mental illness and/or high risk of suicide
  • are pregnant
  • have an anticipated life expectancy of less than 12 months. Patients who are on antidepressants but still meet the PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7 entry criterion for clinical depression and/or anxiety may still be eligible if they have been on an adequate dose of the antidepressant for an adequate duration of time (i.e., 12 weeks).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Assisted Symptom Management (ASM)
There will be 2 principal components to assisted symptom management (ASM): automated symptom monitoring, along with pain and mood self-management modules.
There will be 2 principal components to assisted symptom management (ASM): automated symptom monitoring, along with pain and mood self-management modules.
Experimental: Comprehensive Symptom Management (CSM)
This arm couples ASM with care management by a nurse-physician team, thus testing "combined" therapy vs. "monotherapy" (ASM only).
This arm couples ASM with care management by a nurse-physician team, thus testing "combined" therapy vs. "monotherapy" (ASM only).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Z-score of Pain-anxiety-depression Severity
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary outcome measure is the composite z-score of the main pain, anxiety, and depression measures in this trial: the BPI, GAD-7, PHQ-9, respectively. A standard z-score is calculated for each scale as follows: subject's scale score minus the sample mean divided by the sample standard deviation. A composite pain-anxiety-depression score is the average of the standard z-scores for the 3 scales. This is a scale of effect size where 0 represents no change from baseline, and a negative number means improvement and a positive number means worsening. Each unit means one standard deviation change from the group at baseline. Practical minimum value= -2.0, maximum value= +2.0. Positive number indicates greater symptoms severity/worse outcomes.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Average/Enjoyment of Life/General Activities Pain Scale (PEG)
Time Frame: 12 months
The PEG is a 3-item validated version of the Brief Pain Inventory. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes.
12 months
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 12 months
The PHQ-9 has been used in hundreds of research studies as a depression severity and outcome measure and, now translated into more than 80 languages, is among the most widely used depression measures in clinical practice. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 27. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes.
12 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Anxiety Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 12 months
The GAD-7 is an anxiety severity measure, validated in several thousand primary care patients and increasingly used in clinical research and practice. It is also a good first-line measure for estimating the probability of 4 common anxiety disorders in primary care - generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and social anxiety disorder. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 21. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes.
12 months
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: 12 months
The BPI rates the intensity of pain on 4 items (current, worst, least, and average pain in past week), and the interference in 7 areas (mood, physical activity, work, social activity, relations with others, sleep, enjoyment of life). Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity/worse outcomes.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kurt Kroenke, MD, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Assisted Symptom Management (ASM)

Subscribe