Comparison of Lipiflow®-Treatment and a Standard Lid Hygiene Regime

October 6, 2014 updated by: David Finis, MD, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of an Automated Thermal Pulsation Treatment (Lipiflow ®) and a Standard Lid Hygiene Regime

Recently, beneficial effects on Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) of a single automated thermal pulsation with the Lipiflow® system have been reported in several case reports. In one study this treatment was compared with hyperthermia (iheat®) for 4 weeks. However, treatment recommendations for lid hygiene according to the MGD-report consist of hyperthermia followed by lid massage and lid margin cleansing over several months. To the best of the investigators knowledge this is the first randomized prospective study to compare automated thermal pulsation treatment with the new Lipiflow ® system with a standard lid hygiene regime.

The investigators suggest that a single treatment with Lipiflow® is superior to a lid hygiene regime.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Once a patient has been identified as a possible candidate for the study, he/she is first informed verbally and in writing about the study. After signing the consent form he/she will be randomized to either the Lipiflow® treatment (Lipiflow® group) or alternatively be given an instruction sheet and a verbal explanation for lid warming and massage (lid hygiene group). After 3 month a cross-over of the lid hygiene group to the Lipiflow® group is conducted.

A full examination is performed before and 4 weeks and 3 months after therapy. All tests are performed by a physician or trained graduate students of the Department of Ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine University. The examiner is blinded, i.e. he does not know which treatment the patient will receive or receiving.

Treatment Lipiflow®:

The automated thermal pulsation with Lipiflow® provides is a low risk therapy. After local anesthesia the applicators are inserted. These look like a kind of goggles and consist of two parts which embrace the eyelids from the front and from behind. Through the rear part heat is applied to a maximum of 42.5° C. By isolating the heat remains on the eyelid limited. Through the front part the gland a massage is performed. The treatment takes 12 minutes per eye and can be done depending on the patient's wishes simultaneously or one eye after the other. The therapy is approved by the FDA as a medical technical innovation and has also been approved by ISO and CE Mark certification for use in Europe. Irritation or minor trauma of the eyelids and the conjunctiva and cornea, as well as a violation of the eyelids and the conjunctiva and cornea are theoretically possible, but extremely unlikely. Permanent damages to the eyes have not been reported in the literature.

In the unlikely event, that complications occur during treatment, requiring an additional treatment, this is performed in the department of ophthalmology of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf.

Test parameters:

At any time of investigation, the following parameters are evaluated:

Lipiview®, Tear Lab®, Schirmer test, break-up time, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, Meibomian gland evaluation (MGE), examination of the eyelids, Meibography, OSDI score, SPEED score

All test parameters are established procedures and have in common a very low risk of harm to the patient. In detail:

The Lipiview® is a device that quantifies the thickness of the lipid layer of the tear film using interferometry. For this the patient looks into a kind of camera while recordings of his tear film are made, which are then analyzed by a computer.

Tear Lab® is a method for measuring tear film osmolarity. A pen-like instrument (the osmometer) is held on the tear meniscus and collects 100 nl tears within fractions of a second in the unit. There is no need for local anaesthesia. By electrical impedance measurement, then the tear film osmolarity is measured. The examiner can then read the values digitally.

The Schirmer test consists of a strip of filter paper that is placed in the conjunctival sac of the patient for five minutes. The filter paper absorbs the tear fluid and the stained by the tear fluid line serves as a measure of tear secretion.

Tear break-up time is the time between a blink and the tear film shows signs of breaking up. In this study this is measured non-invasive with the Oculus-Keratograph 5 M®. The patient looks into a kind of camera while recordings of his tear film are made which are then analyzed by a computer.

Vital corneal and conjunctival epithelium cannot be stained by fluorescein. The dye adheres to nonviable cells. The degree of staining, can be judged by the investigator by slit-lamp examination.

For evaluation of the secreting meibomian glands a specialized device (Meibomian gland evaluator) is used, that provides a defined pressure to the lid. The examiner observes the ducts of the Meibomian glands and assesses how many glands are yielding secretion.

Examination of the eyelids is done using a slit lamp to assess a thickening or a significant vascularisation the lid margin.

To perform meibography the lids are illuminated by infrared light. Functional acini of the glands become clearly visible and can be differentiated from atrophic acini. The number of atrophic meibomian glands can be counted by a score.

OSDI (Ocular-Surface-Disease-Index) and SPEED (Standard Pattern Evaluation of Eye Dryness) are questionnaires to quantify the symptoms of dry eye.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Duesseldorf, Germany, D-40225
        • Deparment of ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with meibomian gland dysfunction requiring treatment (defined below),
  • who have given their written consent to the study.
  • Meibomian gland dysfunction requiring treatment is classified by us as:
  • Speed score> 7, Lipiview <61 nm, MGE <5 of 15 open glands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excluded are patients who, due to other diseases would not be able to fulfill the follow-up appointments or give an informed consent to the study
  • Systemic medication with tetracyclin derivatives, antihistamines, isotretinoin, or nutritional supplements for MGD that started <3 months before baseline examination
  • Topical cyclosporine-A or steroids that started <1 month before baseline examination
  • Ocular surgery or trauma <3 months before baseline examination
  • Any eyelid abnormalities
  • Systemic diseases resulting in dry eye.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Lid Hygiene Regime
Patients receive detailed verbal and written instruction to perform lid hygiene twice daily
Patients receive verbal and written instruction to perform lid hygiene twice daily
Active Comparator: Lipiflow
Patients receive a singe Lipiflow-treatment
Patients receive a single Lipiflow-treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Dry Eye Symptoms
Time Frame: after 3 month compared to baseline value

The symptoms of dry eyes are measured in our study with the OSDI and the SPEED questionaire. Primary outcome measure (OSDI)

Patients completed two symptom questionnaires: OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and SPEED (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye dryness).

OSDI scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (severe symptoms). SPEED scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 28 (severe symptoms). So a reduction of the OSDI or SPEED score indicates an improvement of subjective dry eye symptoms.

after 3 month compared to baseline value

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Break-up-time
Time Frame: after 3 month compared to baseline value

break-up-time is measured non-invasive with the Oculus Keratograph 5 M;

The break-up-time is measured in seconds. A low break-up-time suggests a lower lipid layer thickness. A higher break-up-time can be regarded as an improvement of ocular surface lubrication.

after 3 month compared to baseline value
Change in Tear Film Osmolarity
Time Frame: after 3 month compared to baseline value

osmolarity is measured with the tear-lab;

The osmolarity is measured in mOsm/l. A higher osmolarity can be regarded as an objective sign of dry eye disease.

A lower osmolarity after therapy can be regarded as an improvement of ocular surface disease.

after 3 month compared to baseline value
Change in Lipid Layer Thickness
Time Frame: after 3 month compared to baseline value

lipid layer thickness (LLT) is measured with the Lipiview-interferometer;

High values of LLT indicate a better lubrication of the ocular surface, so an increase in LLT can be regarded in an improvement of ocular surface.

LLT is measured in Interferometric color units (ICUs) whereas 1 ICU reflects about 1 nm lipid layer thickness.

after 3 month compared to baseline value
Change in Expressible Meibomian Glands
Time Frame: after 3 month compared to baseline value
expressible Meibomian glands are measured with the Meibomian gland evaluator; A higher number of expressible Meibomian glands indicate a lower likelihood Meibomian Gland dysfunction.
after 3 month compared to baseline value

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Gerd Geerling, M.D., Deparmtent of ophthalmology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HHUAU052012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Lid hygiene regime

Subscribe