Cytochrome P450-2D6 Screening Among Elderly Using Antidepressants (CYSCE) (CYSCE)

August 15, 2017 updated by: Prof. Dr. Bob Wilffert, University of Groningen

Effects and Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Screening Among Elderly Starters With Antidepressants: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Depression is common among elderly with an estimated prevalence of 5%. Due to ageing the national burden will double in the coming decade. Antidepressants as TCAs and SSRIs are effective in reducing symptoms, especially in people with severe depression. To optimize treatment efficacy and reduce side effects, the Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association developed guidelines for dose-adaptation, for instance for antidepressants such as nortriptyline and venlafaxine based on their main relevant genotype (CYP2D6) accompanied by Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. Such personalized drug dosing based on pharmacogenetic information at the start of therapy can speed up the titration phase of antidepressants to establish an adequate maintenance dose. However, pharmacogenetic screening programs are expensive and evidence on effects and costs of such a program among elderly antidepressant starters from randomized controlled studies is lacking. The investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to determine the effects and costs of pharmacogenetic screening information to optimize drug dosing in depressed elderly patients who start with nortriptyline or venlafaxine.

Objective: The primary objective is to determine the effects of pharmacogenetic screening for CYP2D6 on the time to reach adequate blood levels as an accepted proxy for adequate treatment. Secondary objectives include adverse drug reactions and cost-effectiveness

Study design: pragmatic randomized controlled intervention study

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which psychiatric elderly care centers participate in the Netherlands. Deviating genotypes are expected to be found in ~30% of the population, therefore the study consist out of two parts. First a basic study in which ~750 patients, starting with nortriptyline or venlafaxine will be genotyped to identify patients with deviating genotypes (Poor, Intermediate or Ultrarapid Metabolizers). Second in the main study 150 patients with a deviating genotype are randomly allocated to two study arms one with and one without information on the genotype. From the extensive metabolizers('normal'genotype) 75 patients are allocated to a third arm as an external control.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands, 5200ME
        • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
      • 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands, 5201DZ
        • Reinier van Arkel groep
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1070BB
        • GGz inGeest
      • Den Haag, Netherlands, 2552KS
        • Parnassia
      • Ermelo, Netherlands
        • GGz Centraal
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • University Medical Centre Groningen
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • Lentis
      • Heiloo, Netherlands, 1851NG
        • GGZ-NHN
      • Leeuwarden, Netherlands
        • GGZ Friesland
      • Zwolle, Netherlands
        • Isala Klinieken
    • Brabant
      • Halsteren, Brabant, Netherlands
        • GGZ WNB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major depression according to DSM-IV (296.2x, 296.3x) criteria for which the treating psychiatrist decided to start drug treatment with either nortriptyline or venlafaxine.
  • Competent to understand the informed consent procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of clinically relevant CYP2D6 inhibitors
  • Use of clinically relevant CYP2D6 inducers
  • Use of other drugs that affect plasma levels as co-medication
  • Serious hepatic failure
  • Patients for which drug treatment with venlafaxine is started and a GFR < 30 ml/min.
  • Patients with the very rare genotype: Intermediate Metabolizer with duplications (IMDUP).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Normal genotype- control (NG-C)
In the external control group, an advice for dose adaptation based on patients serum drug levels will be given to the physician according to current daily practice. Allocation to this arm is not based on randomization.
No Intervention: Deviating genotype -control (DG-C)
In the internal control group, an advice for dose adaptation based on patients serum drug levels will be given to the physician according to current daily practice
Experimental: Deviating genotype (DG-I)
In the intervention group, genotype information accompanied by a drug dosing advice will be given to the treating physician. Blood level of the drug will be communicated by a dedicated research team to the treating physician according to daily practice.
Dosing advices for deviating genotypes (Poor Metabolizer, Intermediate Metabolizer, Ultrarapid Metabolizer)based on the guidelines of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum drug levels of nortriptyline or venlafaxine
Time Frame: After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started, after the 6th week sampling continues every 2 weeks untill adequate serum drug level is reached with an expected average of 8 weeks

Serum drug levels will be assessed by 'dried blood spot' analysis, blood will be obtained by a fingerprick.

Adequate serum drug levels is defined as: serum drug levels within the therapeutic window (for nortriptyline 50-150 µg/L, for venlafaxine 200-400 µg/L in combination with stable drug dosing for at least 3 weeks.

After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started, after the 6th week sampling continues every 2 weeks untill adequate serum drug level is reached with an expected average of 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse drug events Questionnaire
Time Frame: At start of treatment and from that moment on, every 2 weeks untill adequate drug serum levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Adverse drug events will be assessed by a self-reported questionnaire (ASEC). Two different questionnaires will be used, one for the side-effects of venlafaxine and another one for nortriptyline. Both are based one the ASEC questionnaire.
At start of treatment and from that moment on, every 2 weeks untill adequate drug serum levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed by the EQ5D questionnaire. This information will also be used for a cost-effectiveness analysis.
After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Productivity Questionnaire
Time Frame: After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Effects on productivity by means of the Short Form-Health and Labour Questionnaire, part Labour. This information will also be used for a cost-effectiveness analysis.
After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Self reported Severity of depression Questionnaire
Time Frame: After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Severity of depression by means of the QIDS-SR.
After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Drug use
Time Frame: At inclusion, after 2, 4 and 6 weeks after inclusion and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug level is reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Drug use, including exact dosing and duration of prescription will be assessed by self reported drug use by the patient. This information will also be used for a cost-effectiveness analysis.
At inclusion, after 2, 4 and 6 weeks after inclusion and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug level is reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Data on health care associated resource use
Time Frame: After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks
Data on health care associated resource use (e.g. visits to the specific specialists including diagnoses; drug use including exact dosing and durations of prescriptions; hospitalizations, inclusive exact intensities of care; and lab values if relevant). This information will also be used for a cost-effectiveness analysis.
After 2, 4 and 6 weeks treatment started and if adequate serum drug levels are not reached in 6 weeks, every 2 weeks, untill adequate serum drug levels are reached with an expected average of 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bob Wilffert, Prof. Dr., University of Groningen
  • Principal Investigator: Eelko Hak, Prof. Dr., University of Groningen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Genotype information accompanied by a drug dosing advice

3
Subscribe