Cognitive Phenotypes in Parkinson's Disease (CogPhenoPark)

May 11, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Cognitive Phenotypes in Parkinson's Disease: Anatomical and Functional Correlates

  • a data driven approach has identified different cognitive phenotypes in Parkinson's disease (PD)
  • this heterogeneity possibly reflects the diversity of the neuronal damage caused by the disease
  • we hypothesize that the different clinical presentations are associated to specific anatomical and functional correlates

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cognitive impairments are frequent in PD, even in non-demented patients. However, there is a substantial heterogeneity in the clinical presentation of cognitive deficits in PD 2 and also in their progression. This heterogeneity possibly reflects the diversity of the neuronal damage caused by the disease and recent studies suggest that these different clinical influence the risk of developing dementia.

Most studies on cognitive phenotypes in PD have used predefined categories, such as demented vs. non-demented, or PD-mild cognitive impairment vs. cognitively intact patients. However, such an approach may miss less obvious or unexpected presentations. To this end, in a first part of this study, we have used a data-driven approach (cluster analysis) to identify different cognitive phenotypes in PD. With such an approach where phenotypical profiles arise from the data without a priori assumptions, five cognitive presentations were identified: i°) cognitively intact patients (19.39%), ii°) patients with slight mental slowing and mild executive dysfunction (41.29%), iii°) patients with slightly impaired overall cognitive efficiency and deficits in all cognitive domains except recognition memory (12.93%), iv°) patients with severe mental slowing, impaired overall cognitive efficiency, and severe cognitive impairment in all domains, including memory (23.88%), and v°) patients with very severe impairment in all cognitive domains (2.51%). From these results, it could be hypothesized that cognitive deterioration in PD progresses along a continuum, with the exception of the fourth group that also exhibits memory deficits. This group may be characterized by a different underlying pathology, or comorbidity with Alzheimer's disease. The role of vascular factors has also to be considered.

The objectives of the current project are:

  1. to validate the identified cognitive profiles prospectively in a new population using confirmatory cluster analysis.
  2. to identify specific anatomical correlates for the identified cognitive profiles by magnetic resonance-imaging (MRI) scanning
  3. to identify specific functional correlates of the identified cognitive profiles by high-density EEG (hd-EEG)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Maastricht University Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with Parkinson's disease, according to international criteria, irrespective of their disease stage or their current antiparkinsonian medication

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females;
  • 18 to 80 years;
  • Parkinson's disease, according to international criteria;
  • Without neurological co-morbidity;
  • Benefiting from health insurance;
  • Having read and understood the information form and having signed the consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Parkinsonian syndrome other than PD;
  • Currently participating in an other clinical trial or study;
  • Patient whose physical or mental condition is incompatible with the study assessments;
  • Person under tutorship or curatorship;
  • Subjects with claustrophobia
  • Subjects carrying incompatible metallic devices such as pacemakers and certain mechanical valves
  • PD patients treated by deep brain stimulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Parkinson's disease
Patients with Parkinson's disease according to international criteria
  • comparisons of clinical characteristics
  • comparisons of cognitive profiles
  • comparisons of grey matter density patterns
  • comparisons of EEG rhythms features

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency (%) of the cognitive profile
Time Frame: 2 years
Frequency of the different observed cognitive profile, as coming from the cluster analysis
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grey matter density (voxels)
Time Frame: 2 years
Grey matter density as measured by voxel-based morphometry
2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG power (microvolts2)
Time Frame: 2 years
EEG power in the different frequency bands
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathy Dujardin, PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

February 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012_26
  • 2012-A01317-36. (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on data

Subscribe