- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01804673
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (Fentanyl-ITS) in the Management of Post-Surgery Pain
August 2, 2013 updated by: Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H
Global Assessment of Treatment With IONSYS and Its Handling by Patients, Doctors and Nursing Staff in the Management of Acute Moderate to Severe Post-Surgery Pain in Hospitalised Patients
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal (through the skin) system (fentanyl-ITS) in daily clinical practice for management of acute (a quick and severe form of illness in its early stage) moderate to severe post-operative pain (pain after surgery) including the comprehensibility and usefulness of the accompanying information material.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is an open label (all people know the identity of the intervention), single arm, and multi-center (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the fentanyl-ITS for management of acute moderate to severe pain in post-operative participants' who have undergone elective surgery (surgery which could be postponed or not done at all without danger to the participant).
The study will consists of 2 phases: screening phase (which comprises of pre-operative and post-operative stages) and an open label treatment phase.
The participants will be treated with 40 microgram (mcg) of fentanyl transdermally per on-demand dose; each delivered over 10 minutes for a maximum of 6 doses (240 mcg) per hour for 24 hours and a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 milligram [mg]).
Each system will inactivate at 80 doses or 24 hour, whichever occurs first.
A new system will be applied every 24 hours unless the participant has used 80 doses in less than 24 hours.
Maximum treatment duration of 72 hours is allowed.
Participants will be expected to require parenteral (administration by injection) opioids (morphine like medications) for at least 24 hours post-operatively.
This study will evaluate participant's, nurse's and physician's assessment of fentanyl-ITS under routine conditions.
Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
174
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Augsburg, Germany
-
Berlin, Germany
-
Bremen, Germany
-
Detmold, Germany
-
Dresden, Germany
-
Erfurt, Germany
-
Erlangen, Germany
-
Frankfurt, Germany
-
Halle, Germany
-
Jena, Germany
-
Kiel, Germany
-
Köln, Germany
-
Leipzig, Germany
-
Lünen, Germany
-
Mainz, Germany
-
Mannheim, Germany
-
Marburg, Germany
-
Münster, Germany
-
Ravensburg, Germany
-
Regensburg, Germany
-
Schwerin, Germany
-
Solingen, Germany
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants with American Society of Anesthesiology (specialty concerned with the study of anesthetics [drug that is used to produce loss of pain sensation] and anesthesia [loss of sensation or feeling]) pre-operative physical status 1, 2 or 3
- Participants who are expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours post-operatively (after the surgery)
- Participants, after an elective major surgical procedure (surgery which could be postponed or not done at all without danger to the participant), who are expected to have moderate or severe pain requiring parenteral (administration by injection) opioids (morphine like medications) for at least 24 hours after surgery
- Participants who are capable of understanding and cooperating with the requirements of the study and operating a transdermal (through the skin) Patients-Controlled Analgesia (PCA; methods of pain relief that may be used with or in place of analgesics [drug used to control pain])
- Participants with a pain score less than or equal to 4 (moderate pain) out of 10 on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), whereas 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 to the strongest imaginable pain at movement of the operated limb or body region, after titration (slow increase in drug dosage, guided by participant's responses) to comfort according to current postoperative procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants allergic or hypersensitive (very sensitive) to fentanyl or cetylpyridinium chloride or to skin adhesives
- Participants who are known or suspected to be strong opioid dependent, or who have a very high a need for strong opioids before entering the study
- Participants with a history of psychological opioid dependence before the start of the study
- Participants who are known or suspected to have abused any drug substance or alcohol in the opinion of the investigator
- Women who are pregnant, breast feeding, or planning to breast feed within 24 hrs of the last dose of study drug.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fentanyl-ITS
|
Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal (through the skin) System (ITS) will release fentanyl at the rate of 40 microgram (mcg) (1 dose) to maximum of 240 mcg per hour (6 doses) but not more than 3.2 milligram (mg) (80 doses) per 24 hours.
The duration of study treatment will be 72 hours.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 24
Time Frame: Hour 24
|
Participants were asked to rate their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment on a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent).
Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.
|
Hour 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hours Per Day With Average Pain Intensity Less Than or Equal to 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72
|
Number of hours per day with average pain intensity less than or equal to 4 was measured on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10, 0=no pain; 4=mild pain; 10=strongest pain imaginable).
If the participant was sleeping at time of measurement, pain intensity was assumed to be less than or equal to 4.
|
Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Hour 24, 48 and 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Hour 24, 48 and 72
|
Nursing staff asked the participants to rate their current pain intensity on 11-point NRS (range 0 to 10, 0= no pain; 10= strongest pain imaginable).
|
Baseline, Hour 24, 48 and 72
|
|
Time Spent Out of the Bed Per Day by the Participant
Time Frame: Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72
|
Participants were asked to enter the time in hours spend out of bed during the last 24 hours in the participant diary.
|
Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72
|
|
Time to Mobilization
Time Frame: Baseline, Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
Participants were asked to describe their time schedule for particular steps of mobilization by answering specific questions in the participant diary.
|
Baseline, Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 48 and 72
Time Frame: Hours 48 and 72
|
Participants were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent).
Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.
|
Hours 48 and 72
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment of Pain
Time Frame: Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
Physicians were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent).
Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.
|
Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Nursing Staff Global Assessment of Pain
Time Frame: Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
Nursing Staff were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent).
Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response.
|
Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
|
Physician's Evaluation of Participant's Ability to Undergo Physiotherapy or Mobilization
Time Frame: Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
Physicians were asked to rate the participant's ability to undergo physiotherapy or mobilization by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: Part 1 A- Does the surgical procedure performed allow the mobilization of the participant, C- Was the mobilization of the participant limited due to pain, D- Is the participant in a condition to undergo physiotherapy; Part 2 A- Was it possible to mobilize the participant sooner than with other pain therapies, B- Does the participant move more, C- Is the participant less afraid of moving.
For Part 1-Question C, 'Partial' indicates that mobilization of participant was moderately limited due to pain.
|
Hours 24, 48 and 72
|
|
Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Physician Questionnaire Responses
Time Frame: Hour 72
|
Physicians were asked to evaluate the IM for fentanyl-ITS (IONSYS) by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: Part2 D- Would you use IONSYS again, E- Would you prefer IONSYS to intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA); Part3 A- Was IM easy to understand, B- Did IM help you to use system properly.
|
Hour 72
|
|
Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Nursing Staff Questionnaire Responses
Time Frame: Hour 72
|
Nursing staff were asked to evaluate the IM for IONSYS by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: IM A- Was IM easy to understand, B- Did IM help you to use system properly; IONSYS PCA A- Is system easy to handle, B- Did participant need help in using system, C- Do you feel confident using IONSYS; IV PCA- Are you experienced in using IV PCA; IONSYS PCA D- Could participant get mobilized sooner, E- Does participant move more, F- Is participant less afraid of moving, G- Were hospital logistics for IONSYS easier to handle.
|
Hour 72
|
|
Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Participant Questionnaire Responses
Time Frame: Hour 72
|
Participants were asked to evaluate the IM for IONSYS by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: A- Is IONSYS easy to use, B- Were you able to operate the system by yourself after receiving instructions, C- Have you found button yourself, D- Was pressing button easy, E- Have you heard system's beeps, F- Was IONSYS IM easy to understand, G- Did IM help you to use system, H- Did you have problems falling asleep, I- Could you move easily in bed, J- Did system bother you during physiotherapy, K- Do you perceive use of such system as modern treatment standard.
|
Hour 72
|
|
Post-Operative Phase (PPP33) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Hour 72
|
The PPP33 questionnaire has an overall score and 8 subscales that represent different aspects of the post-operative quality of life: information, autonomy, communication, physical complaints, pain, rest, fear and accommodation.
Answers to individual question are scored with values 1 to 4. Summary scores are calculated by adding values for each question.
Subscores ranges depend on the number of questions evaluated (2 to 7 questions).
The overall score ranges from 1 to 100.
Higher scores indicate less pain.
|
Hour 72
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 4, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
March 5, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
August 5, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 2, 2013
Last Verified
August 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Postoperative Complications
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Pain, Postoperative
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Fentanyl
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR005440
- FEN-PAI-3002
- 2005-004087-24 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Pain ManagementTurkey
-
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, IncCompletedPostoperative Pain ManagementUnited States
Clinical Trials on Fentanyl-ITS
-
Janssen Cilag N.V./S.A.Terminated
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Myocardial IschaemiaChina
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)TerminatedDepressionUnited States
-
Women's College HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Unity Health Toronto; University of Toronto; The Physicians' Services Incorporated FoundationNot yet recruitingAchilles Tendinopathy | Achilles Insertional TendinopathyCanada
-
Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri UniversityCompletedLisfranc InjuryTurkey
-
University of ChileColumbia UniversityRecruitingDepression | Covid-19 | Anxiety | Mental Health Disorder | SARS-CoV-2 | Stress DisorderUnited States, Italy, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Czechia, Germany, Guatemala, Lebanon, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Puerto Rico, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, Venezuela
-
University of ChicagoEnrolling by invitation
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Science Council, TaiwanUnknownUrinary Incontinence | Uterine Prolapse | Fecal IncontinenceTaiwan
-
Sait Fatih ÖnerCompletedSedation | Postoperative Recovery | Cognitive Recovery | Ambulatory Gynecologic SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Pomeranian Medical University SzczecinUnknownNecrotizing Enterocolitis | Intracranial Hemorrhages | Retinopathy of Prematurity | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn | Anemia, Neonatal | Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaPoland