Facet Versus Trigger Point Injections for Chronic Neck Pain

December 13, 2018 updated by: Dave Walton, Lawson Health Research Institute

Facet Versus Trigger Point Injection for Management of Chronic Muscular Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Creation of a Clinical Prediction Algorithm

A) Background Chronic neck pain is a significant and common issue which is difficult to treat. Tight bands of muscle (trigger points) can be a source of chronic neck pain and they are sometimes injected to manage chronic neck pain. However, these injections seldom lead to significant, long-lasting relief. In some cases, these trigger points may originate from injury or damage to a specific joint in the neck (the facet joint). Treatment of this joint with cortisone injection may lead to improved pain relief and function.

B) Hypothesis By injecting the facet joint with cortisone, the pain associated with tight bands of muscle in the neck and shoulders will be relieved to a greater extent than that attained through trigger point injection.

C) Methods Patients with neck pain will have a test to determine if any pain originates from the facet joint. Among those who have significant pain from these joints, a comparison between the effect of cortisone injection into these joints versus injection into the trigger points will be evaluated.

D) Expected Results and Significance

It is expected that injection with cortisone into the facet joints will lead to improved pain and function when compared to that attained from trigger point injection. In addition, the number of trigger points, and the pain and headache that originate from these trigger points, are expected to decrease with cortisone injection into the facets to a statistically and clinically significant extent. Results from this pilot study will then influence the design of future trials into chronic neck pain treatment, leading to better clinical recommendations. A peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations will facilitate dissemination.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

43

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2
        • St. Joseph's Hospital / Parkwood Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • between 18 and 65 years of age and able to speak and understand conversational English
  • Primary diagnosis of chronic (>6 months) mechanical / myofascial neck pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with significant cognitive decline or cognitive interference (as identified by the physician) will be excluded, as will those who have received radiofrequency ablation of any cervical nerve within the past year, intra-articular cortisone facet injection within the past 4 months, trigger point injection into the cervical/shoulder girdle muscles within the past 4 months, or the presence of any known contraindication to injection (Attachments).
  • Women who are or may be pregnant (based on last menstruation) will be excluded.
  • Finally, for the purposes of this pilot study, those currently involved in active litigation regarding the neck pain will be excluded. Those with active worker's compensation claims or currently receiving salary indemnity benefits through motor vehicle insurance providers will be included, as they represent a significant proportion of this population.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dexamethasone
Intra-articular corticosteroid number 2.
4mg/mL
Experimental: Betamethasone
Subjects will receive either betamethasone or dexamethasone injected into the cervical facet joints (levels determined by experienced physician).
6 mg/mL injected into the facet joint as dictated by modified dual-comparative medial branch block diagnostic protocol
Other Names:
  • Betaject/Celestone
Active Comparator: Intramuscular injection
Subjects in this group will receive lidocaine injection directly into tender myofascial trigger points.
2%
Active Comparator: Home exercise
Subjects in this group will receive education and a pamphlet on a set of standardized home exercises for neck pain
Standardized home exercise program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
A 15-point self-report scale ranging from 0 = A very great deal worse to 15 = A very great deal better (8 = no change).
1, 3, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
1, 3, and 6 months
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
1, 3, and 6 months
Headache Impact Test - 6
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
1, 3, and 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
1, 3, and 6 months
Adverse Events Checklist
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
Constructed specifically for this study.
1, 3, and 6 months
Global Cervical Active Range of Motion
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
Measured using a digital inclinometer
1, 3, and 6 months
Mechanical (Pressure) Pain Threshold
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
Measured using a digital algometer over standardized myofascial trigger points.
1, 3, and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M Walton, BScPT, PhD, Western University, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Dexamethasone

Subscribe