- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01822223
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Laser-Ablated Implant-Abutments to Promote Tissue Healing
A Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Arm, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Laser-Ablated Implant-Abutments for Enhanced Oral Mucosal Healing
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will assess the integrity of the peri-implant oral soft-tissue attachment to implant abutments by comparing tissue responses to a laser-ablated implant-abutment and an implant-abutment manufactured with a smooth surface.
Investigators will assess the initial post-surgical peri-implant attachment-seal and will test whether or not the tissue-abutment interface re-forms with equal integrity when the abutment is removed and replaced with a new abutment.
Data will include histological, radiographic, clinical, and subjective aesthetics to compare the effectiveness of two abutment designs. Both devices are supplied by the BioHorizons Implant Systems Inc. of Birmingham, Alabama; the abutments are analogous in design and material except the test device has a laser-ablated surface and the control abutment is smooth.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294-0007
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 19 years old
- Healthy enough to under go treatment
- Have one or more edentulous sites that exhibit adequate natural bone and sufficient keratinized tissue
- Demonstrated willingness to undergo study treatment and to comply with study timeline -
Exclusion Criteria:
- Full edentulism
- Any chronic health condition or medication that in the opinion of the investigators may adversely affect bone healing
Any indication of an inability to make autonomous decisions
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Laser-ablated dental implant-abutments
Laser-ablated dental implant abutments will be attached to surgically placed dental implants.
|
At week-8, abutments will be removed and replaced with new Laser-Lok® abutments. An inter-arm randomization will assign subjects to one of two sub-groups per treatment arm. Sub-groups 1-a & 2-a: will receive a new Laser-Lok® abutment and a soft-tissue biopsy at week-8; a force-probe clinical attachment assessment of the same site will be delayed until week-16. Sub-groups 1-b & 2-b: will receive a new Laser-Lok® abutment and a force-probe clinical attachment assessment at week-8; a biopsy harvested from the same study site will be delayed until week-16. The implants will be restored following standard technique and a final visit will occur 6 months following permanent restoration.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Smooth implant-abutments
Smooth dental implant-abutments will be attached to surgically placed dental implants.
|
At week-8, abutments will be removed and replaced with new Laser-Lok® abutments. An inter-arm randomization will assign subjects to one of two sub-groups per treatment arm. Sub-groups 1-a & 2-a: will receive a new Laser-Lok® abutment and a soft-tissue biopsy at week-8; a force-probe clinical attachment assessment of the same site will be delayed until week-16. Sub-groups 1-b & 2-b: will receive a new Laser-Lok® abutment and a force-probe clinical attachment assessment at week-8; a biopsy harvested from the same study site will be delayed until week-16. The implants will be restored following standard technique and a final visit will occur 6 months following permanent restoration.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number od Participants With Consistent Connective Tissue Integration at a Histologic Level
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-abutment placement
|
Connective tissue integration was assessed by radio graphic images of tissue and bone surrounding the implant.
|
8 weeks post-abutment placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Grams of Force Needed to Disrupt Tissue Attachment to the Abutment
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-abutment placement
|
A force transducing periodontal probe instrument will electronically capture the grams of force needed to disrupt the attachment to the implant abutment; tissues will be probed from the gingival margin to the alveolar bone crest at 4 points around each abutment and an adjacent tooth: measurements will be captured from the mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual.
The specific force probe generates a descriptive graph that demonstrates the cumulative force and distribution necessary to disrupt the attachment of the gingival tissues to the abutment.
These graphs were recorded, but were difficult to interpret and have not been reported.
|
8 weeks post-abutment placement
|
Mean Change in Millimeters of Clinical Attachment to the Abutment
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-abutment placement
|
A periodontal probe will be used to measure the level of clinical attachment to the abutment in millimeters.
Measurements will be captured at 4 points around each abutment; mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual.
All measurements were considered and the change in attachment level was assessed at each individual site.
Data were reported as descriptive and were used to elucidate potential advantages and/or disadvantages of varying abutment types.
These data were strictly confirmatory to the proof-in-principle histology presented in the report.
Measures were taken at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 12 months to determine if attachment to one abutment type was more or less stable over time.
The specific force probe generates a descriptive graph that demonstrates the cumulative force and distribution necessary to disrupt the attachment of the gingival tissues to the abutment.
These graphs were recorded, but were difficult to interpret and have not been reported.
|
8 weeks post-abutment placement
|
Mean Change in Millimeters of Clinical Attachment to the Abutment
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-abutment placement
|
A periodontal probe will be used to measure the level of clinical attachment to the abutment in millimeters.
Measurements will be captured at 4 points around each abutment; mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual.
All measurements were considered and the change in attachment level was assessed at each individual site.
Data were reported as descriptive and were used to elucidate potential advantages and/or disadvantages of varying abutment types.
These data were strictly confirmatory to the proof-in-principle histology presented in the report.
Measures were taken at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 12 months to determine if attachment to one abutment type was more or less stable over time.
The specific force probe generates a descriptive graph that demonstrates the cumulative force and distribution necessary to disrupt the attachment of the gingival tissues to the abutment.
These graphs were recorded, but were difficult to interpret and have not been reported.
|
12 weeks post-abutment placement
|
Mean Change in Millimeters of Clinical Attachment to the Abutment
Time Frame: 16 weeks post-abutment placement
|
A periodontal probe will be used to measure the level of clinical attachment to the abutment in millimeters.
Measurements will be captured at 4 points around each abutment; mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual.
All measurements were considered and the change in attachment level was assessed at each individual site.
Data were reported as descriptive and were used to elucidate potential advantages and/or disadvantages of varying abutment types.
These data were strictly confirmatory to the proof-in-principle histology presented in the report.
Measures were taken at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 12 months to determine if attachment to one abutment type was more or less stable over time.
The specific force probe generates a descriptive graph that demonstrates the cumulative force and distribution necessary to disrupt the attachment of the gingival tissues to the abutment.
These graphs were recorded, but were difficult to interpret and have not been reported.
|
16 weeks post-abutment placement
|
Mean Change in Millimeters of Clinical Attachment to the Abutment
Time Frame: 12 month post-abutment placement
|
A periodontal probe will be used to measure the level of clinical attachment to the abutment in millimeters.
Measurements will be captured at 4 points around each abutment; mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual.
All measurements were considered and the change in attachment level was assessed at each individual site.
Data were reported as descriptive and were used to elucidate potential advantages and/or disadvantages of varying abutment types.
These data were strictly confirmatory to the proof-in-principle histology presented in the report.
Measures were taken at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 12 months to determine if attachment to one abutment type was more or less stable over time.
The specific force probe generates a descriptive graph that demonstrates the cumulative force and distribution necessary to disrupt the attachment of the gingival tissues to the abutment.
These graphs were recorded, but were difficult to interpret and have not been reported.
|
12 month post-abutment placement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Bio-LL-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedPartially Edentulous JawChina
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamZimmer DentalCompleted
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedPartially Edentulous JawChina
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedPartially Edentulous JawChina
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompleted
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompleted
-
Institut Straumann AGCompletedJaw, Edentulous, Partially | Jaw, EdentulousBelgium
-
Dentsply Sirona Implants and ConsumablesCompletedJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyUnited States, Germany
-
NeodentActive, not recruiting
-
University of MichiganTerminatedJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyUnited States
Clinical Trials on Dental implant-abutments
-
University of SalamancaCompletedEdentulous; Alveolar Process, AtrophySpain
-
Harvard School of Dental MedicineUnknownMissing Teeth | Teeth Replacemnt by Single Dental Implant | Zirconia Abutment | Titanium Abutment
-
Malo ClinicNobel BiocareActive, not recruitingEdentulous JawPortugal
-
Technische Universität DresdenCompletedZirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses
-
ZimVieCompletedPartial Edentulism | Tooth DiseaseUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamZimmer DentalCompleted
-
Aula Dental AvanzadaCompletedDental Implant Failed | Dental Prosthesis FailureSpain
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingHorizontal Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar RidgeEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingDental Implant Failed | Dental Implants | Single Tooth LostGermany, Hong Kong