Study on OsseoSpeed™ TX Implants in a Chinese Population

September 11, 2019 updated by: Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables

An Open, Prospective, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the OsseoSpeed™ TX Implant With an Early Loading Protocol in Patients With Tooth Loss in the Posterior Mandible. A 3-years Follow-up Study.

To investigate the clinical efficacy of OsseoSpeed™ TX implants in a Chinese population by evaluation of marginal bone level alteration, implant stability and implant survival in the posterior mandible up to 3 years after loading. Hypothesis: Early loading of the posterior mandible is a safe and predictable procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100081
        • Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Beijing University
      • Guangzhou, China, 510055
        • Department of Prosthodontics & Dental Materials, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University
      • Shanghai, China, 200011
        • Department of Prosthodontics, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Provision of informed consent
  2. Aged 20-75 years at enrolment
  3. History of edentulism in the posterior mandible, Kennedy classes I or II, of at least four months. Last natural tooth in function is canine or first bicuspid.
  4. Neighboring tooth to the planned bridge must have natural root.
  5. Presence of natural teeth, partial prosthesis and/or implants in the opposite jaw in contact with the planned bridge.
  6. Deemed by the investigator to have adequate bone height and a bone width of minimum 5.5 mm.
  7. Deemed by the investigator as likely to present an initially stable implant situation

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures, as judged by the investigator
  2. Earlier graft procedures in the study area
  3. Current need for pre-surgical bone or soft tissue augmentation in the planned implant area.
  4. Uncontrolled pathologic processes in the oral cavity
  5. Known or suspected current malignancy
  6. History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region
  7. History of chemotherapy within 5 years prior to surgery
  8. Systemic or local disease or condition that could compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
  9. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  10. Corticosteroids or any other medication that could influence post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
  11. Smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day
  12. Present alcohol and/or drug abuse
  13. Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both Astra Tech staff and staff at the study site)
  14. Previous enrolment in the present study.
  15. Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or participation in a clinical study during the last 6 months.
  16. Subjects that are unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: OsseoSpeed TX
OsseoSpeed TX implants of lengths 8-17 mm
OsseoSpeed TX implants of lengths 8-17 mm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal Bone Level Alteration
Time Frame: Evaluated 3 years after implant loading
Marginal Bone Level determined from radiographs and expressed as the difference from a reference point on the implant to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. Marginal Bone Level expressed in millimeters at the 3 year follow-up visit compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration i.e. loading (baseline).
Evaluated 3 years after implant loading

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant Survival
Time Frame: From implant placement to the follow-up 36 months after loading.
Implant survival rate evaluated clinically and radiographically.
From implant placement to the follow-up 36 months after loading.
Implant Stability
Time Frame: Measured from loading of implants to the follow-up 36 months after loading.
Implant stability evaluated clinically/manually (recorded as stable yes/no)
Measured from loading of implants to the follow-up 36 months after loading.
Soft Tissue Status (PPD).
Time Frame: Measured from loading of implants to the follow-up 36 months after loading.

Soft tissue status measured by assessment of probing pocket depth (PPD). PPD was measured at 4 different surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) and change compared to baseline (loading) was analyzed.

A negative value = increased pocket depth.

Measured from loading of implants to the follow-up 36 months after loading.
Soft Tissue Status (BoP)
Time Frame: Measured from loading of implants to the follow-up 36 months after loading.
Soft tissue status measured by assessment of bleeding on probing (BoP).
Measured from loading of implants to the follow-up 36 months after loading.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yongsheng Zhou, Prof, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Beijing University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 3, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partially Edentulous Jaw

Clinical Trials on OsseoSpeed TX

3
Subscribe