Whole Body Vibration in Chronic Stroke

April 1, 2013 updated by: Marco Yiu-Chung Pang, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Application of Vertical Whole Body Vibration in Stroke Patients: Neuromuscular Effects, and Clinical Efficacy

This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of a 10-week whole body vibration training program on physical functioning, societal participation and quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke. It is hypothesized that the whole body vibration program will induce significantly more gain in physical functioning, societal participation, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients, compared with the control group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kowloon
      • Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marco Y Pang, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of a hemispheric stroke
  • chronic stroke (onset of 6 months or more)
  • aged 18 years or older
  • medically stable
  • able to stand for at least 1 minute with hand support
  • Abbreviated Mental Test score at 6 or more
  • Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment leg or foot score less than 7 points

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recurrent stroke
  • brainstem or cerebellar stroke
  • other neurological conditions
  • significant musculoskeletal conditions (e.g. amputations)
  • vestibular disorders
  • peripheral vascular disease
  • other serious illnesses
  • other contraindications to exercise.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
This group will undergo three 45-minute exercise sessions per week for 10 weeks. No whole body vibration will be given.
Experimental: Low intensity vibration
This group will receive three 45-minute whole body vibration training sessions for 10 consecutive weeks. The vibration will be of low intensity (frequency: 20 Hertz, amplitude: 1mm).
Experimental: High intensity vibration
This group will receive three 45-minute whole body vibration training sessions per week for 10 consecutive weeks.The vibration will be of higher intensity than the low intensity vibration group (frequency: 30 Hertz, amplitude: 1mm).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Isometric knee muscle strength
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Isometric knee muscle strength
Time Frame: week 10
week 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Eccentric knee muscle strength at a velocity of 60 degrees per second
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Eccentric knee muscle strength at a velocity of 60 degrees per second
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Concentric knee muscle strength at a velocity of 60 degrees per second
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Concentric knee muscle strength at a velocity of 60 degrees per second
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Distance walked in the Six Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Distance walked in the Six Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Average oxygen consumption rate during the Six Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Average oxygen consumption rate during the Six Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Time taken to complete the Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Time taken to complete the Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Time taken to complete the Five-times-sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Time taken to complete the Five-times-sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Distance reached in the Functional Reach test
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Distance reached in the Functional Reach test
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Balance score as measured by the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Balance score as measured by the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Walking ability as measured by the Functional Ambulation Category
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Walking ability as measured by the Functional Ambulation Category
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Balance confidence scores as measured by the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Balance confidence scores as measured by the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Quality of life score as measured by the 12-item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Quality of life score as measured by the 12-item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Level of activity participation as measured by the Frenchay Activities Index
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Level of activity participation as measured by the Frenchay Activities Index
Time Frame: Week 10
Week 10
Level of perceived environmental barriers as measured by the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Level of perceived environmental barriers as measured by the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors
Time Frame: week 10
week 10
Ankle spasticity score as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: week 0
week 0
Ankle spasticity score as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: week 10
week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco YC Pang, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Leg exercises

Subscribe