18F-FLT Positron Emission Tomography and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Planning Surgery and Radiation Therapy and Measuring Response in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ewing Sarcoma

November 16, 2017 updated by: Mayo Clinic

A Pilot Study of the Utility of 18F-FLT-PET and Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Surgical Planning, Radiotherapy Target Delineation, and Treatment Response Evaluation in Ewing Sarcoma Patients

This pilot trial studies fluorine F 18 fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) positron emission tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in planing surgery and radiation therapy and measuring response in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures done before and after treatment may help doctors predict a patient's response and help plan the best treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Establish correlation between 18F-FLT positron emission tomography (PET) activity, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) values from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), fludeoxyglucose F 18 (18F-FDG) PET activity, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement, and pathologic response for Ewing sarcoma.

II. Assess the efficacy of detecting therapy induced changes in 18F-FLT PET uptake and ADC from DW-MRI for more accurately predicting local control, event-free survival, and overall survival as compared to standard prognostic factors (e.g. change in tumor size).

III. Compare radiotherapy target volume delineation with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI information to delineation with pre-chemotherapy conventional MRI to determine role of advanced imaging in radiotherapy treatment planning for Ewing sarcoma.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Establish correlation between 18F-FLT PET activity, ADC values from DW-MRI, 18F-FDG PET activity, MRI contrast enhancement, and biomolecular assays for Ewing sarcoma.

II. Determine imaging thresholds to discriminate between viable and necrotic tumor, as established through pathologic correlations.

III. Assess efficacy of advanced imaging for more accurately guiding biopsy targeting by comparing planned targeting with standard (MRI contrast enhancement) vs. advanced imaging (18F -FLT PET and DW-MRI).

IV. Compare post-treatment response assessment with 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI vs. 18F-FDG PET to determine whether 18F-FLT PET and ADC information is more accurate than 18F-FDG PET for distinguishing between necrosis and non-specific inflammation immediately following treatment.

V. Estimate potential reduction in acute and late side effects based on modified radiation therapy (RT) treatment volumes with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI information as compared to volumes delineated with pre-chemotherapy conventional MRI.

VI. Evaluate automatic image segmentation techniques for 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI, comparing against biopsy determined imaging thresholds and expert Nuclear Medicine and MR Radiologist contours.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and DW-MRI the week prior to induction therapy, within one week after the completion of induction therapy, the week prior to RT (for patients that received surgery), and within 1 week of completion of RT.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for up to 4 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological confirmation of newly diagnosed localized or newly diagnosed with metastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) or primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of bone or soft tissue
  • Planning to receive definitive RT or surgery with or without adjuvant RT
  • Willing to sign release of information for any follow-up records
  • Provide informed written consent if >= 18 years; if < 18 years, provide informed written assent and parent or legal guardian provide informed written consent
  • Patients must have measurable disease
  • Willingness to participate in mandatory imaging studies
  • Willingness to provide mandatory pathology samples for correlative research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to undergo MRI scans with contrast (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, kidney failure)
  • Unable to undergo 18F-FLT PET scan
  • Any of the following:

    • Pregnant women
    • Nursing women
    • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diagnostic (18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, DW-MRI)
Patients undergo 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDGPET, and DW-MRI the week prior to induction therapy, within one week after the completion of induction therapy, the week prior to RT (for patients that received surgery), and within 1 week of completion of RT.
Correlative studies
Undergo DW-MRI
Other Names:
  • diffusion-weighted MRI
Undergo 18F-FLT PET
Other Names:
  • 18F-FLT
  • 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine
  • fluorothymidine F-18
Undergo 18F-FDG PET
Other Names:
  • 18FDG
  • FDG
Undergo 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET
Other Names:
  • PET
  • FDG-PET
  • PET scan
  • tomography, emission computed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
18F-FLT PET activity
Time Frame: At the time of surgical resection
The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.
At the time of surgical resection
ADC values from DW-MRI
Time Frame: At the time of surgical resection
The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.
At the time of surgical resection
18F-FDG PET activity
Time Frame: At the time of surgical resection
The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.
At the time of surgical resection
MRI contrast enhancement
Time Frame: At the time of surgical resection
The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.
At the time of surgical resection
Pathologic response
Time Frame: At the time of surgical resection
The primary measure of the samples will be % of viable malignant cells remaining. To examine the correlation of 18F-FLT PET, 18F-FDG PET, and ADC signals in areas of concordance and discordance with standard MR imaging as it impacts differentiation of viable and necrotic tumor extent, sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive values will be estimated. Findings will be summarized using point-estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. Differences in sensitivity and specificity will be evaluated using McNemar's test.
At the time of surgical resection
18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI in predicting local control, event-free survival, and overall survival, measured by therapy-induced changes in the scans
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The prognostic ability of 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI imaging will be evaluated by correlating changes in 18F-FLT uptake and ADC as treatment response both after chemotherapy (but prior to RT) and after RT with local control and survival outcomes, with the intent of establishing predictive thresholds. The results will be compared to standard prognostic factors such as change in tumor size and histopathology.
Up to 5 years
Radiotherapy target volume delineation with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
PET images and DW-MRI ADC maps co-registered and regions of concordance and discordance quantified for each modality as compared to pre-chemotherapy conventional MRI. The concordance correlation coefficient will be used to measure agreement between volumes generated at different times, with different modalities, and by different individuals. The measured variability associated with contrast-enhanced MRI will serve as the standard for comparison. The mean and standard deviation of volumes and their discordances will be calculated as a measure of the potential treatment impact of each modality.
Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Imaging thresholds
Time Frame: Up to 1 week after completion of chemotherapy and radiation therapy
Imaging thresholds to discriminate between > 90% and 100% necrotic tumor as established by pathology will be determined.
Up to 1 week after completion of chemotherapy and radiation therapy
Efficacy of advanced imaging in accurately guiding biopsy, measured by differences in determining target location by contrast enhancement or 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI
Time Frame: At the time of surgery/biopsy
At the time of surgery/biopsy
Accuracy in distinguishing between necrosis and non-specific inflammation immediately following treatment
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Treatment response as measured by the advanced imaging immediately following treatment will be compared to response as measured by conventional 18F-FDG PET follow-up imaging. In the case of local recurrence, patterns of local failure will be compared with imaging performed before and after local therapy.
Up to 5 years
Reduction in acute side effects based on modified RT treatment volumes with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI as assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Time Frame: Within 7 days after completion of RT
For each patient the portion of the treated volume that is negative on PET or DW-MRI will be calculated to estimate the region of additional normal tissue that could be excluded from radiation treatment fields. Similarly, any volume that is positive on PET or DW-MRI, but outside of the post-chemotherapy treatment volume will be reported.
Within 7 days after completion of RT
Reduction in late side effects based on modified RT treatment volumes with pre- and post-chemotherapy 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI as assessed by the NCI CTCAE 4.0 version
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
For each patient the portion of the treated volume that is negative on PET or DW-MRI will be calculated to estimate the region of additional normal tissue that could be excluded from radiation treatment fields. Similarly, any volume that is positive on PET or DW-MRI, but outside of the post-chemotherapy treatment volume will be reported.
Up to 5 years
Automatic image segmentation techniques for 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
To develop a standardized delineation technique for the 18F-FLT PET and DW-MRI images and reduce operator error and subjectivity, the variation of volumes defined with different segmentation techniques will be evaluated and compared against the biopsy determined imaging thresholds and expert Nuclear Medicine and MR Radiologist contours.
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ewing Sarcoma of Bone

Clinical Trials on laboratory biomarker analysis

3
Subscribe