Improving Parental Soothing by Video

April 13, 2015 updated by: RRiddell, York University

Improving Parental Soothing by Video: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study sets out to compare the effectiveness of a parent pain management coaching video that is 5-minutes in length. The investigators will be comparing an active-video to a placebo-video of equal length (and identical formatting). Participants will be 6 or 18 month infants undergoing routine immunization. The investigators hypothesize the active video will result in a lowering of infant pain expressed post-immunization (3 minutes) and the increase in the parental use of distraction, physical comfort, and rocking.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Our goal is to determine if a video instructing parents on the principles of soothing their infant following immunization will influence soothing behaviours exhibited by parents, and pain reactivity and regulation in infants. We plan to present parents of young infants (6 months) and older infants (18 months) with either a Treatment Video instructing them on the ABCD's (Assess Anxiety, Belly Breathe, Calm Close Cuddle, Distraction; Copyright R. Pillai Riddell) of pain management or a Placebo Video with neutral information. There is very minimal risk because our suggestions are based on what parents deemed 'sensitive' (in our ongoing longitudinal study) were doing naturally i.e., without any intervention in their day-to-day lives. Additionally, in a separate study, that already received ethics approval, parents viewed these videos without any negative side effects.

Participants will be adult parents from one of two clinics in the Greater Toronto Area who bring their infant in for a routine immunization (12 or 18 months). In our cohort study (where we simply videotape dyads in the clinic).

Parents will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire (Parent Information Sheet) entailing basic demographic information and preimmunization ratings of their worry about their infant's pain from the immunization. The parents will also be asked to complete the 18-item Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) and the Negative Affect subscale (IBQ-R Very short form), in addition to demographic information. The parents will subsquently be asked to view a brief video (Treatment or Placebo Video) discussing the ABCD's of pain management described above. During the infant's routine immunization procedure the parents and infant will be videotaped for approximately 10 minutes, and the parent will be asked a few brief questions post immunization including ratings of their infant's pain from the immunization procedure and the helpfulness of the video.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4P 3H1
        • Dr. Saul Greenberg's Pediatric Clinic
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1N8
        • Dr. Hartley Garfield's Pediatric Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 months to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants must be 6 or 18 months old receiving a routine immunization injection.
  • Parents must be fluent in English.
  • Only one child per family can be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No suspected developmental delays or chronic illnesses.
  • Time spent in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
  • Born more than 3 weeks premature.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Video
This is a five-minute video that coaches parents about how to soothe their infant post-immunization.
This group will watch an active-video with pain management strategies for parents
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Video
This is a video identical to that of the active video, except no specific instructions regarding how to soothe an infant post-immunization are given.
This group will watch a placebo-video describing immunization generally.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Behaviour Pain Scale
Time Frame: 3 minutes post-last needle
Infant pain regulation was operationalized using The Modified Behaviour Pain Scale (MBPS), modified by Taddio et al. (1995) for use with infants during office procedures. The measure rates the severity of distress reflected in three types of infant pain behaviours: (1) facial expressions; (2) cry; and (3) body movements during 15-second epochs post-immunization (for 3 minutes). Infants are assigned a score from 0 to 3 (or 0 to 4 on the cry scale), with larger values indicating a more intense behavioural response (Total Range 0-10)
3 minutes post-last needle

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of Adult and Infant Soothing and Distress
Time Frame: 3 minutes post-last needle
The MAISD (Measure of Adult and Infant Soothing and Distress; Cohen et al., 2005) is a behavior observation scale that was developed to examine the discrete behaviors exhibited by parents during children's invasive medical procedures. Rather than attempting to examine all behaviors, only those that were viewed as being potentially impacted by the treatment video will be included. Thus, distraction, rocking, physical comfort were selected. Each behaviour is coded every 5 seconds for either presence or absence (0 or 1). Three separate scores will be derived for each behaviour (distraction, rocking, physical comfort).
3 minutes post-last needle

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca R Pillai Riddell, PhD, York University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • York HPRC 2013-004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Clinical Trials on Active-Video

3
Subscribe