- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01828099
LDK378 Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With ALK Rearranged Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized Study of Oral LDK378 Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive), Stage IIIB or IV, Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This was an open-label, randomized, global, Phase III study that compared the efficacy and safety of ceritinib to standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced (NSCLC) harboring ALK rearrangement. The confirmation of ALK rearrangement was done using the ICH test by a Novartis designated central laboratory. Prior to the study, patients had not received any previous systemic, anti-cancer therapy, including ALK inhibitors, for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC.
The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either receive ceritinib (750 mg once daily, fasted) or chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a platinum-based doublet with pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed maintenance in patients without progressive disease after 4 cycles.
Treatment was continued until the blinded independent review committee (BIRC) confirmed disease progression based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, or meeting other discontinuation criteria. Patients in either arm were permitted to continue the assigned study treatment beyond BIRC-confirmed disease progression in case of continued clinical benefit, as determined by the Investigator.
All patients who discontinued treatment during the treatment phase for reasons other than death, lost to follow-up, pregnancy or disease progression entered the post-treatment follow-up period until disease progression, withdrawal of consent or death.
In the chemotherapy arm, patients were allowed to switch and receive ceritinib after BIRC-confirmed disease progression (extension-treatment period).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
La Rioja, Argentina, 5300
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Buenos Aires
-
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1180AAX
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1050AAK
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Auckland, Australia, 92024
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Queensland
-
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Victoria
-
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Salzburg, Austria, 5020
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Wien, Austria, 1210
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
BA
-
Salvador, BA, Brazil, 40170-110
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
CE
-
Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, 60336-045
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PE
-
Recife, PE, Brazil, 50070-550
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
RJ
-
Rio De Janiero, RJ, Brazil, 20231-050
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
RN
-
Natal, RN, Brazil, 59075 740
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Rio Grande Do Sul
-
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90610-000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
SC
-
Itajai, SC, Brazil, 88301-229
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
SP
-
Barretos, SP, Brazil, 14784 400
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil, 15090 000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01246-000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100730
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Beijing, China, 101149
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Chongqing, China, 400037
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Chongqing, China, 400042
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Guang Dong Province, China, 510120
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Tianjin, China, 300052
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Jilin
-
Chang Chun, Jilin, China, 130021
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Changchun, Jilin, China, 130012
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Shanxi
-
XI An, Shanxi, China, 710038
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310022
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Monteria, Colombia, 230004
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Cundinamarca
-
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 110111
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Herlev, Denmark, DK-2730
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Odense C, Denmark, DK 5000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Caen, France, 14033
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Grenoble, France, 38043
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Lille, France, 59037
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Paris 10, France, 75475
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Pierre Benite, France, 69495
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Rennes, France, 35043
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Strasbourg Cedex, France, 67091
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Villejuif, France, 94800
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Haute Vienne
-
Limoges, Haute Vienne, France, 87000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Val De Marne
-
Toulon Cedex 9, Val De Marne, France, 83800
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Coswig, Germany, 01640
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Essen, Germany, 45147
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Gottingen, Germany, 37075
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Grosshansdorf, Germany, 22947
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Koeln, Germany, 50937
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Oldenburg, Germany, 26121
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Tuebingen, Germany, 72076
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Ulm, Germany, 89081
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Wiesbaden, Germany, D-65199
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Heraklion Crete, Greece, 71110
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
GR
-
Athens, GR, Greece, 115 27
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1121
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Nyiregyhaza, Hungary, 4400
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Veszprem, Hungary, 8200
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Zala
-
Zalaegerszeg, Zala, Hungary, 8900
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Delhi, India, 110 085
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Mumbai, India, 400 012
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Andhra Pradesh
-
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500 034
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Delhi
-
New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110076
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560 095
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Kerala
-
Kochi, Kerala, India, 682 041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Maharashtra
-
Nashik, Maharashtra, India, 422 004
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Rajasthan
-
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, 302017
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Tamil Nadu
-
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, 632 004
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
TamilNadu
-
Madurai, TamilNadu, India, 625107
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
West Bengal
-
Kolkata, West Bengal, India, 700160
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Dublin 4, Ireland, DO4
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Napoli, Italy, 80131
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
AN
-
Ancona, AN, Italy, 60126
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
BG
-
Bergamo, BG, Italy, 24125
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
GE
-
Genova, GE, Italy, 16132
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
MB
-
Monza, MB, Italy, 20900
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
MI
-
Milano, MI, Italy, 20162
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Milano, MI, Italy, 20132
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Milano, MI, Italy, 20141
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Rozzano, MI, Italy, 20089
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PG
-
Perugia, PG, Italy, 06129
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PI
-
Pisa, PI, Italy, 56124
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PN
-
Aviano, PN, Italy, 33081
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PR
-
Parma, PR, Italy, 43100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
RE
-
Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy, 42123
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
RM
-
Roma, RM, Italy, 00152
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Roma, RM, Italy, 00189
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
TO
-
Orbassano, TO, Italy, 10043
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
UD
-
Udine, UD, Italy, 33100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Niigata, Japan, 951 8520
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Aichi
-
Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 464 8681
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Chiba
-
Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, 277 8577
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Hyogo
-
Akashi, Hyogo, Japan, 673-8558
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Osaka
-
Hirakata-city, Osaka, Japan, 573-1191
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan, 541-8567
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Tokyo
-
Koto ku, Tokyo, Japan, 135 8550
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Gyeonggi Do
-
Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi Do, Korea, Republic of, 13620
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Korea
-
Gyeonggi do, Korea, Korea, Republic of, 10408
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ashrafieh, Lebanon, 166830
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Saida, Lebanon, 652
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44280
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Amersfroort, Netherlands, 3818 ES
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Enschede, Netherlands, 7512 KZ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Groningen, Netherlands, 9728 NZ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 HX
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Zoetermeer, Netherlands, NL-2722 EP
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Zuid Holland
-
Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0310
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Szczecin, Poland, 70-891
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Warszawa, Poland, 02 781
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 119228
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Singapore, Singapore, 168583
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28033
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28050
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Andalucia
-
Granada, Andalucia, Spain, 18014
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Malaga, Andalucia, Spain, 29010
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain, 41013
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain, 41014
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Asturias
-
Oviedo, Asturias, Spain, 33011
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Cataluna
-
Lerida, Cataluna, Spain, 25198
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Mataro, Cataluna, Spain, 08301
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Reus, Cataluna, Spain, 43201
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Catalunya
-
Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08035
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08003
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Hospitalet de LLobregat, Catalunya, Spain, 08907
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Comunidad Valenciana
-
Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 03010
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46014
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Extremadura
-
Badajoz, Extremadura, Spain, 06080
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Galicia
-
La Coruna, Galicia, Spain, 15006
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Lugo, Galicia, Spain, 27003
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Islas Baleares
-
Palma De Mallorca, Islas Baleares, Spain, 07120
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Navarra
-
Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
-
La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain, 38320
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Linkoping, Sweden, SE 581 85
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Lund, Sweden, 221 85
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Uppsala, Sweden, 751 85
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83301
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 407219
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33305
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Hat Yai
-
Songkhla, Hat Yai, Thailand, 90110
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
THA
-
Khon Kaen, THA, Thailand, 40002
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06230
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 35100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
London, United Kingdom, NW1 2BU
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2BX
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Devon
-
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom, EX2 5DW
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
West Yorkshire
-
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient had a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of non-squamous Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive as assessed by the Ventana Immunohistochemistry (IHC) test. The test was performed at Novartis designated central laboratories.
- The patient had a newly diagnosed stage IIIB (who was not a candidate for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV NSCLC or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not previously treated with any systemic anti-cancer therapy (e.g. cytotoxic drugs, monoclonal antibody therapy, crizotinib or other ALK inhibitors, or other targeted therapies, either experimental or not), with the exception of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy.
- The patient had at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient had known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of LDK378 (microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, crospovidone, colloidal silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate).
- The patient had a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum-containing drugs, pemetrexed, or any known excipients of these drugs.
- The patient had symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases and was neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to screening to manage CNS symptoms.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ceritinib
Ceritinib administered continuously through oral dosing at a dosage of 750 mg once daily in fasted state.
|
Ceritinib was administered orally once-daily fasted at a dose of 750 mg capsules on a continuous dosing schedule.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Chemotherapy
Pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin (based on Investigator's choice) for 4 cycles (Induction) followed by pemetrexed as single agent (Maintenance)
|
Carboplatin was administered as iv infusion (AUC 5-6) every 21 days up to 4 cycles
Pemetrexed was administered at a dose of 500 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (iv) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
Cisplatin was administered by iv infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m^2 every 21 days for up to 4 cycles.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by BIRC per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause.
A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date.
The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
|
From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
|
OS defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If the patient was alive at the date of the analysis cut-off or lost to follow-up, then OS was censored at the last contact date prior to data cut-off date. The distribution of OS was estimated using the KM method. |
From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BIRC Assessment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 34 months
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response defined as complete response (CR) or or partial response (PR) measured by BIRC per RECIST 1.1.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions.
In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
|
Up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 120 months
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response defined as complete response (CR) or or partial response (PR) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
Up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) by BIRC Assessment
Time Frame: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
|
DOR is defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. If a patient had not had an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Patients who had never achieved a best overall response of CR or PR were excluded from the analysis. The distribution function of DOR was estimated using the KM method. |
From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 120 months
|
DOR is defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. If a patient had not had an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Patients who had never achieved a best overall response of CR or PR were excluded from the analysis. The distribution function of DOR was estimated using the KM method. |
From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by BIRC Assessment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 34 months
|
DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease. |
Up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 120 months
|
DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease. |
Up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Time to Response (TTR) by BIRC Assessment
Time Frame: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 34 months
|
TTR is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented response (CR or PR) measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Patients who had not achieved a confirmed CR or PR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they had not had a PFS event or at maximum follow-up when they had had a PFS event. |
From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 120 months
|
TTR is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented response (CR or PR) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Patients who had not achieved a confirmed CR or PR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they had not had a PFS event or at maximum follow-up when they had had a PFS event |
From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 120 months
|
|
PFS by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
|
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the KM method. |
From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Overall Intracranial Response Rate (OIRR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 34 months
|
OIRR is defined as the ORR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated as the percentage of patients with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR in the brain per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuroradiologist. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
Up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Intracranial Disease Control Rate (IDCR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 34 months
|
IDCR is defined as the DCR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated as the percentage of patients with a best overall response of CR or PR or SD (or non-CR/nonPD) in the brain per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuro-radiologist. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease |
Up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Duration of Intracranial Response (DOIR)
Time Frame: From first documented response to first documented disease progression in the brain or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
|
DOIR is defined as the DOR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated from the time of first documented response of CR or PR to the date of the first documented disease progression in the brain or death due to any cause per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuro-radiologist. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
From first documented response to first documented disease progression in the brain or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
|
|
Time to Definitive 10 Point Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ)- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 complemented the QLQ-C30 and measured disease symptoms and treatment-related adverse effects. The lung cancer module incorporated one multi-item scale to assess dyspnea and 9 single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All of the domain scores ranged from 0 to 100. A high score indicated a high level of symptoms. Time to definitive symptom deterioration for the composite endpoint was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest date when the patient's score showed a 10 point or higher increase from baseline in any of the symptoms (pain, cough or dyspnea) as per EORTC QLQ-LC13 (with no later change below this threshold i.e., <10 points was observed or if this increase was observed at the last assessment for the patient) or death due to any cause. |
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Time to Definitive Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The LCSS patient scale used a 24-hour recall period and contained nine items: six measuring major symptoms for lung cancer (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain), and three summary items related to total symptom distress, normal activity status, and overall quality of life. The LCSS used a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) to measure the intensity of patient responses, with zero corresponding to the lowest rating (best status) and 100 representing the highest rating (worst status). Time to definitive deterioration for the composite endpoint was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest date when the patient's score showed a 10 point or higher increase from baseline in any of the LCSS scores related to pain in the chest, cough, or dyspnea (with no later change below this threshold i.e., <10 points was observed or if this increase was observed at the last assessment for the patient) or death due to any cause. |
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC-QLQ C30
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contained 30 items and was of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties), and a global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) scale.
Items were assessed on a 4- or 7-level Likert scale, ranging from 1="very poor" to 7= "excellent" for GHS items and 1= "not at all" to 4= "very much" for all other items.
The scores of the scales were averaged from the scores of the component items, transformed, and analyzed on a 0 - 100 scale.
A high score represented a higher response level.
The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score.
Overall mean and standard error were obtained
|
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC QLQ- LC13
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 was used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provided information on an additional 13 items specifically related to lung cancer.
The lung cancer module incorporated one multi-item scale to assess dyspnea, and 9 single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis.
Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much".
For the multi-item scale, the scores were averaged from the scores of the component items, transformed, and then analyzed on a 0 - 100 scale.
For the single item scale, raw scores were transformed and analyzed on a 0-100 scale.
A high score indicated a high level of symptoms The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score.
Overall mean and standard error were obtained.
|
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Least Squares Mean Scores on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The LCSS consisted of 9 individual items; 6 measured lung cancer symptoms (appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, and pain); the remaining 3 items measured general lung cancer symptom distress, interference with daily activities and overall QoL. Each item was scored on a 100-millimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = best outcome). Total score was calculated as the average of the aggregate score of all 9 items. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher total scores indicating a greater overall impact of symptoms on the patient's QoL. The Symptom Burden Index (SBI) was calculated as the average of the six symptom items. It also ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden. Scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained. |
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Index
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of these dimensions, the participant self-assigned a score: from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The 5 digit health states obtained for each dimension was converted into a single mean index value based on the EQ-5D crosswalk value set for the UK using the time trade-off method. This index ranges from -0.594 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health). The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained. |
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of the 5 following dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Along with the five dimensions of health, the EQ-5D-5L includes a VAS where respondents rate their overall health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained. |
Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
|
|
Cmax of LDK378
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
The observed maximum plasma concentration following administration
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
|
Tmax of LDK378
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
The time to reach peak or maximum concentration (Tmax) was assessed.
Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
|
Tlast of LDK378
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
The time to last quantifiable concentration.
Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
|
AUC0-24 of LDK378
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated from time zero to 24 hours
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lin YT, Yu CJ, Yang JC, Shih JY. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Kinase Domain Mutation Following ALK Inhibitor(s) Failure in Advanced ALK Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis and Literature Review. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):e77-e94. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
- Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L, Wolf J, Geater SL, Orlov S, Cortinovis D, Yu CJ, Hochmair M, Cortot AB, Tsai CM, Moro-Sibilot D, Campelo RG, McCulloch T, Sen P, Dugan M, Pantano S, Branle F, Massacesi C, de Castro G Jr. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):917-929. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X. Epub 2017 Jan 24. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):908. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30603-7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Folic Acid Antagonists
- Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Pemetrexed
- Carboplatin
- Ceritinib
Other Study ID Numbers
- CLDK378A2301
- 2013-000319-26 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Healthy, no Evidence of Disease | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung... and other conditionsUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
University of California, DavisNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingNon Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIC | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer UnresectableUnited States
-
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of Cambridge; Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust; Institute... and other collaboratorsRecruitingNon Small Cell Lung Cancer | Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Locally Advanced NSCLC - Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Oncogene-addicted Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Early-stage Operable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage 2/3 Operable Non Small Cell Lung CancerUnited Kingdom
-
Alexander ChiNot yet recruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Carcinoma | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIChina
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Bristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Non-Squamous Non-Small...United States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalFood and Drug Administration (FDA)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer | Advanced Squamous Non Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Jiangxi Provincial People's HopitalNot yet recruitingNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer RecurrentChina
Clinical Trials on Carboplatin
-
Eisai Inc.CompletedCancerUnited States, Austria, India
-
Samyang Biopharmaceuticals CorporationCompleted
-
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaNot yet recruiting
-
Zhejiang Cancer HospitalRecruiting
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeCompletedOvarian Cancer | Fallopian Tube Cancer | Primary Peritoneal Cavity CancerUnited Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand
-
Duke UniversityCompletedBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsUnited States, Canada
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast Cancer | Ovarian CancerUnited States
-
Tang-Du HospitalRecruitingHead & Neck CancerChina
-
MEI Pharma, Inc.CompletedPeritoneal Neoplasms | Ovarian Cancer | Fallopian Tube CancerUnited States, Spain, Belgium, United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, Poland