Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy (WOIT)

June 16, 2016 updated by: Wesley Burks, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in subjects allergic to tree nuts to decrease their tree nut allergy and induce changes in their immune system.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Tree nut

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 45 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (> 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE > 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.
  • A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.
  • Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian
  • Written assent from all subjects as appropriate
  • All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).
  • Known allergy to oat
  • Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.
  • Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
  • Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.
  • Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months
  • Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).
  • Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC
  • Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year
  • Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Walnut protein flour
Walnut protein flour that is ingested in gradually increasing amounts up to a maintenance dose.
Daily ingestion of gradually increasing amounts of walnut protein flour in order to induce desensitization to walnut and an unrelated tree nut.
Other Names:
  • Walnut OIT
Placebo Comparator: Oat flour
Oat flour administered in identical increasing amounts as the active walnut protein flour.
Oat flour that is administered as a placebo in identical increasing doses as the active walnut flour treatment.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy (WOIT) on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut.
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The determination of the effectiveness of WOIT in inducing clinical desensitization to a second tree nut to which the subject is allergic when compared to placebo. This will be measured by the change in the amount of tree nut the subject can consume during their food challenge at 38 weeks compared to their consumption during the baseline challenge at study entry.
38 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of subjects who can tolerate a 5000mg oral food challenge to walnut protein following the desensitization phase of the study
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The percentage of subjects who can consume all of the 5000mg of walnut protein without symptoms during the food challenge after the desensitization phase of the study.
38 weeks
The percentage of subjects who are able to reach a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut and the test tree nut.
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The percentage of subjects who are able to consume a cumulative protein dose of 2000 mg of walnut and test tree nut without symptoms during the desensitization oral food challenge.
38 weeks
The percentage of subjects who demonstrate clinical tolerance at the end of the study to walnut and the test tree nut.
Time Frame: 36 months
The percentage of subjects who are able to demonstrate clinical tolerance by consuming all of the walnut and test tree nut without symptoms during the oral food challenge at the end of the study.
36 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increase in walnut and test tree nut IgG4 over the course of the study.
Time Frame: 36 months
The increase in the walnut and test tree nut specific IgG4 over the course of the study as an indication of the impact of WOIT on the immune system.
36 months
Decrease in the walnut and test tree nut specific IgE over the course of the study.
Time Frame: 36 months
The decrease in the walnut and test tree nut specific IgE over the course of the study as an indication of the impact of WOIT on the immune system.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wesley Burks, MD, UNC Chapel Hill
  • Study Director: Edwin Kim, MD, UNC Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nut Hypersensitivities

Clinical Trials on Walnut Protein Flour

Subscribe