- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01546753
Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy (WOIT)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72202
- Arkansas Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (≥ 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE > 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.
- A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.
- Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian
- Written assent from all subjects as appropriate
- All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).
- Known allergy to oat
- Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.
- Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
- Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.
- Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months
- Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).
- Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma
- Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC
- Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year
- Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers
- Pregnancy or lactation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Walnut Protein Powder
38 weeks on active walnut powder on blinded treatment phase
|
Blinded study product dosing begins with a 1-day oral desensitization protocol to walnut for subjects in the active arm.
Starting at 0.1 mg protein and increasing to a maximum of 6 mg or until allergic symptoms develop.
Subjects continue daily dosing of blinded OIT (walnut) with build-up every 2 weeks to a maximum daily dose of 1500mg at week 34, followed by 4 weeks of daily maintenance dosing.
OFC to walnut and second tree nut occurs at week 38 then treatment is unblinded and open-label maintenance dosing occurs.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Oat Powder
38 weeks on placebo (oat) powder during blinded treatment phase
|
Blinded study product dosing begins with a one-day oral desensitization protocol with placebo (oat) powder.
Subjects in the placebo group will undergo the same protocol as those in the active group with placebo OIT dosing.
Unblinding to treatment assignment will occur after the 38 week oral food challenge.
Placebo subjects will cross-over to active, open-label treatment with walnut powder after the 38 week oral food challenge.
beginning with initial escalation day, through build-up and maintenance dosing per the same protocol sequence as noted for active, walnut powder.
Subjects will complete an oral food challenge to walnut and the second tree nut at week 38 then will continue on long-term, open-label maintenance dosing until the end of study using same protocol design.
Other Names:
|
Other: Open-label Walnut Protein Powder
Open-label treatment with walnut protein powder up to week 298 of total treatment
|
Open-label treatment phase begins after the 38 week oral food challenge with unblinding of treatment assignment.
For those on active treatment, daily maintenance dosing occurs for up to a total of 298 weeks.
For those on placebo treatment, cross-over to active, open-label treatment occurs using the same active treatment protocol.
Placebo-crossover subjects will complete an oral food challenge to walnut and the second tree nut at week 38 of active therapy then continue on long-term, open-label maintenance dosing until the end of study using same protocol design.
All subjects may reach a qualifying IgE to walnut/second tree nut early and will undergo an OFCs on and 4 weeks off OIT.
All subjects will have OFCs on and 4 weeks off OIT at week 142 and at week 298, unless both walnut/second tree nut OFCs are passed at previous OFC prompting addition of these foods into the diet.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Effectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge
Time Frame: 38 weeks of therapy
|
Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut ("test tree nut") causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the test tree nut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.
|
38 weeks of therapy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge
Time Frame: 38 weeks
|
Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to walnut causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the walnut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.
|
38 weeks
|
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38
Time Frame: 38 weeks
|
The percentage of subjects reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut at week 38
|
38 weeks
|
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38
Time Frame: 38 weeks
|
Comparison of the number and percentage of subjects in each treatment arm reaching a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the week 38 (desensitization) oral food challenge to test tree nut
|
38 weeks
|
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge
Time Frame: up to 298 weeks on active treatment
|
The percentage of subjects demonstrating sustained unresponsiveness to walnut and to the test tree nut by end of study. Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants during open-label extension arm through the end of study at week 298. Subjects were able to exit the study at assessment timepoints earlier than week 298 if they are able to pass the sustained unresponsiveness oral food challenge, thus the analysis included all subjects through week 298.. |
up to 298 weeks on active treatment
|
Change in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT
Time Frame: 142 weeks
|
Evaluation of walnut OIT on the mast cell responses as measured through change in skin prick testing to walnut in participants who were treated with walnut OIT to week 142.
Analysis group combines both active and placebo-crossover participants from baseline through open-label treatment phase until the end of study.
|
142 weeks
|
Serious Adverse Events Related to Walnut OIT Treatment
Time Frame: 298 weeks active treatment
|
Incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events during the study
|
298 weeks active treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stacie M Jones, MD, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences / Arkansas Children's Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kulis M, Li Y, Lane H, Pons L, Burks W. Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
- Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27.
- Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):292-300, 300.e1-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
- Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 113364
- FARE (Other Identifier: Food Allergy Research and Education)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tree Nut Allergy
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterFood Allergy InitiativeCompleted
-
University Hospital, LilleRecruitingPeanut and Tree Nut AllergyFrance
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingPeanut Allergies | Tree Nut Allergies | Other Food AllergiesUnited States
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); AAAAI FoundationRecruiting
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationAAAAI FoundationNot yet recruitingFood Allergy | Tree Nut Allergy
-
Jonathan SpergelUniversity of ArkansasWithdrawn
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensHellenic Society of Allergology and Clinical ImmunologyActive, not recruiting
-
Lille Catholic UniversityCompletedChild | Nut Hypersensitivity | Legumes Allergy | Tree Nut Allergy | Allergy Cross Reaction
-
University Hospital, GenevaTerminatedPeanut Allergy | Food Allergy | Tree Nut AllergySwitzerland
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Julia Upton, Hospital for Sick Children, University of TorontoActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on Walnut Protein Powder
-
Jonathan SpergelUniversity of ArkansasWithdrawn
-
Penn State UniversityCalifornia Walnut CommissionCompletedCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillWithdrawnNut Hypersensitivities
-
Abbott NutritionCompleted
-
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, SingaporeCompleted
-
Griffin HospitalCalifornia Walnut CommissionCompletedMetabolic SyndromeUnited States
-
Wageningen University and ResearchCompletedProtein Digestion Kinetics | Intestinal Barrier FunctionNetherlands
-
University of NebraskaAlegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical CenterCompletedProblem With Growth of an InfantUnited States
-
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factor and Kidney Related Biomarkers
-
Griffin HospitalCompleted