Assessment of Helical Tomotherapy Radiotherapy (54 Gy) Followed by Surgery in Retro-peritoneal Liposarcoma (TOMOREP)

February 22, 2021 updated by: Institut Bergonié

Retro peritoneal liposarcomas are rare (less than 15% of sarcomas) whose prognosis is locoregional.

In the treatment of retroperitoneal liposarcomas main prognostic factor is the quality of the surgical resection. The effect of radiotherapy combined with surgery is uncertain and until now limited perhaps because of limited prescribed doses (of the order of 45Gy to 50Gy) due to high risk of organ toxicity nearby.

The helical tomotherapy is an innovative equipment radiotherapy to make conformational radiotherapy modulation intensity and is particularly suitable for irradiations precision (imaging mode associated with daily scanner) in large complex volumes. Increasing doses (increase of the prescribed dose to 54 Gy, thus potentially curative), the helical tomotherapy should allow to improve the efficacy of radiotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Retro peritoneal liposarcomas are rare (less than 15% of sarcomas) whose prognosis is locoregional. In the treatment of retroperitoneal liposarcomas main prognostic factor is the quality of the surgical resection. The effect of radiotherapy combined with surgery is uncertain and until now limited perhaps because of limited prescribed doses (of the order of 45Gy to 50Gy) due to high risk of organ toxicity nearby.

Two elements can overcome these difficulties:

  • Preoperative radiotherapy made rather than Postoperatively, the tumor in place back the gastrointestinal tract and reducing toxicity,
  • The contribution of conformal radiotherapy techniques with intensity modulation (IMRT). The helical tomotherapy is an innovative equipment radiotherapy to make conformational radiotherapy modulation intensity and is particularly suitable for irradiations precision (imaging mode associated with daily scanner) in large complex volumes. Increasing doses (increase of the prescribed dose to 54 Gy, thus potentially curative), the helical tomotherapy should allow to improve the efficacy of radiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alsace
      • Strasbourg, Alsace, France, 67000
        • Centre Paul Strauss
    • Aquitaine
      • Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France, 33000
        • Institut Bergonie
    • Ile De France
      • Paris, Ile De France, France, 75000
        • Institut Curie
    • Midi-Pyrénées
      • Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France, 31000
        • Centre Claudius Régaud
    • Pays De La Loire
      • Nantes, Pays De La Loire, France, 44000
        • Centre Rene Gauducheau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Liposarcoma histologically proven, in case of non-contributive biopsy: diagnosis radiologically validated within a multidisciplinary meeting
  2. Protocol TOMOREP technically feasible,
  3. Patients over 18 years
  4. Considered as resectable even if multi-visceral excision is needed
  5. Absence of morbidity contra-indicating surgery. The evaluation will be performed by the surgeon or the radiotherapist according to the definitions by the ASA classification.
  6. Original form (as well as tumors made after first incomplete excision) and form in first relapse.
  7. Life expectancy greater than 6 months
  8. Patient signed informed consent,
  9. Patient affiliated to a social security.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Metastasis associated
  2. Extension intraperitoneal associated, mesenteric extension
  3. bilaterally
  4. Against disease-indicating the need for surgery (ASA 3 and 4).
  5. Contra-indication to radiotherapy (such as prior radiotherapy into the volume to treat).
  6. Patient included in another clinical trial
  7. Patient unable to undergo medical monitoring test for any geographical, social or psychological reasons,
  8. Private patient freedom and major subject of a measure of legal protection or unable to consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Radiotherapy
Evaluation of the combination of radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy (54 Gy) followed by surgery in retro-peritoneal liposarcomas.
Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Incidence Rate of Local Recurrence and Competing Risks (All Patients)
Time Frame: 3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of local recurrence-free survival 3 years. Given the data and the lack of independence between local recurrence and metastasis events, the Kaplan Meier method cannot be applied. An estimation method adapted to the presence of competing risks is necessary. Including other events (metastasis, deaths...) consist in using a competing risk analysis methodology where the specific incidence of each type of event is estimated in the presence of the other types of events. The following results represent the cumulative incidence (as a percentage) of local recurrence on the one hand and the cumulative incidence of competing risks (distant metastasis or death) on the other hand.

3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment
Cumulative Incidence Rate of Local Recurrence and Competing Risks (Liposarcoma Well Differentiated)
Time Frame: 3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of local recurrence-free survival 3 years.Given the data and the lack of independence between local recurrence and metastasis events, the Kaplan Meier method cannot be applied. An estimation method adapted to the presence of competing risks is necessary. Including other events (metastasis, deaths...) consist in using a competing risk analysis methodology where the specific incidence of each type of event is estimated in the presence of the other types of events. The following results represent the cumulative incidence (as a percentage) of local recurrence on the one hand and the cumulative incidence of competing risks (distant metastasis or death) on the other hand.

3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment
Cumulative Incidence Rate of Local Recurrence and Competing Risks (Liposarcoma Dedifferentiated or Pleomorphic)
Time Frame: 3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of local recurrence-free survival 3 years.Given the data and the lack of independence between local recurrence and metastasis events, the Kaplan Meier method cannot be applied. An estimation method adapted to the presence of competing risks is necessary. Including other events (metastasis, deaths...) consist in using a competing risk analysis methodology where the specific incidence of each type of event is estimated in the presence of the other types of events. The following results represent the cumulative incidence (as a percentage) of local recurrence on the one hand and the cumulative incidence of competing risks (distant metastasis or death) on the other hand.

3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (All Patients)
Time Frame: 3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of disease free survival rate at 3 years, with the kaplan-meier method.

The disease-free survival time is calculated between the date of the start of the tomotherapy treatment and the date of death, distant metastasis or local recurrence (events), whichever occur first, or the date of last news (censorship).

3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment
Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (Liposarcoma Well Differentiated)
Time Frame: 3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of disease free survival rate at 3 years, with the kaplan-meier method.

The disease-free survival time is calculated between the date of the start of the tomotherapy treatment and the date of death, distant metastasis or local recurrence (events), whichever occur first, or the date of last news (censorship).

3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment
Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (Liposarcoma Dedifferentiated or Pleomorphic)
Time Frame: 3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of disease free survival rate at 3 years, with the kaplan-meier method.

The disease-free survival time is calculated between the date of the start of the tomotherapy treatment and the date of death, distant metastasis or local recurrence (events), whichever occur first, or the date of last news (censorship).

3 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (All Patients)
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years and 5 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination with radio-surgery helical tomotherapy irradiation to a dose of radiation of 54 Gy in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma of operable.

The effectiveness will be evaluated in terms of overall survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years, with the kaplan-meier method.

The overall survival time is calculated between the date of the start of the tomotherapy treatment and the date of death (event), or the date of last news (censorship).

1 year, 3 years and 5 years from start of the tomotherapy treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: KANTOR Guy, PU-PH, Institut Bergonie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liposarcoma

Clinical Trials on Radiotherapy

3
Subscribe