Ultrasound-guided PVB (BPV échoguidé)

March 19, 2014 updated by: Centre Jean Perrin

Feasibility of the Use of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Catheterisation for the Analgesic Management of Thoracotomy

Thoracotomy, is a surgical procedure performed routinely in connection with pulmonary surgery. Pain induced by thoracotomy is considered as the most severe post-operative pain. Control of the pain is essential in the perioperative management.

Nowadays, there are several strategies to support this pain, including regional anesthesia techniques in the context of multimodal analgesia. Epidural analgesia reduces pain scores and respiratory complications significantly. ParaVertebral Block (PVB) is a technique as effective as epidural analgesia in the treatment of pain after thoracotomy and could present a more limited number of complications. However, there is no consensus on the best technique for realisation of PVB.

Para-vertebral catheterisation can be performed by posterior approach in seeking a strength loss after bone contact of transverse vertebral process using the technique of Eason and Wyatt, but it is a blind technique. The ultrasonographic control, developed in the context of all puncture invasive actions, is an effective contribution to the realisation of a BPV, but still insufficiently validated. First used to measure the distance skin - posterior costo-transverse ligament and skin - parietal pleura before procedure, the ultrasonography has recently led to the publication of echo-guided techniques combining recognition of structures defining the space para- vertebral, viewing the progression of the needle and the spread of the local anesthetic. The handling of the ultrasonographic probe associated with the puncture requires additional learning.

The objective of this project is to study the feasibility of para-vertebral catheter insertion under ultrasonographic control. The appearance like "pigtail" of the catheter, the most recently proposed, seems the more attractive in terms of safety. The aim of this pilot prospective study is accurately quantify all qualitative parameters related to the technique in order to achieve a future validation with a medico-economic component.

Ultrasound-guided technique will correspond to a technique with a puncture of the lateral to medial space described by Shibata, after spotting of the first rib proposed by Bouzinac.

This study will be proposed to patients undergoing thoracotomy for total or partial pulmonary resection in Thoracic Surgery service of Centre Jean Perrin, the number of patients required is 60 patients over a period of inclusion of 12 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective followed of cohort including consecutive patients, all receiving the same technique of anesthesia and analgesia:

  • Preoperative para-vertebral catheterisation on the surgery side.
  • Preoperative test of the efficiency of para-vertebral block.
  • Conventional general anesthesia.
  • Conventional rescue postoperative analgesia.
  • Systematic radiographic control with injection of contrast product into the para-vertebral catheter.
  • Conventional postoperative monitoring.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Centre de lautte contre le cancer - Centre Jean Perrin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing programmed lateral or posterolateral thoracotomy, regardless of indication,
  • Aged 18 to 80 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery performed in the emergency;
  • Specific clinical contexts including neoplasia in terminal phase or palliative phase;
  • Contraindications to the products of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ultrasoundguided paravertebral catheter
Other Names:
  • ultrasound-guided paravertebral catheterisation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall failure rate of the para-vertebral block
Time Frame: 24 hours
The overall failure rate of the para-vertebral block ( failed installation or efficiency)
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The time (in minutes) between the start of the installation and the effective para-vertebral block obtaining
Time Frame: 24 hours
Effective para-vertebral block obtaining
24 hours
Paravertebral block catheterisation
Time Frame: 24 hours
•Paravertebral catheterisation efficiency
24 hours
Paravertebral block efficiency
Time Frame: 24 hours
Paravertebral block efficiency
24 hours
Pain evaluation
Time Frame: H0+30 min, +1h, +1h30, +2h, +4h, +8h, +12h, +16h, +20h, +24h, +32h, +40h, +48h
•Pain evaluation with Analogic Visual Scale
H0+30 min, +1h, +1h30, +2h, +4h, +8h, +12h, +16h, +20h, +24h, +32h, +40h, +48h
Tolerance hemodynamic, nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: 72 hours
Tolerance hemodynamic, nausea and vomiting reporting
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hammou TAHERI, PhD, Centre de lutte contre le cancer - Centre Jean PERRIN

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on ultrasoundguided paravertebral catheter

3
Subscribe