Pilot Study: Paravertebral Analgesia vs Epidural Analgesia After Thoracotomy (ParaEpi)

December 11, 2015 updated by: Sadeesh Srinathan, MD, University of Manitoba

Pilot Study: A Non-Inferiority Trial of the Analgesic Effect of Paravertebral Analgesia to Epidural Analgesia for the Management of Post-Operative Pain After Thoracotomy

Paravertebral analgesia is non-inferior to epidural analgesia for pain control and superior to epidural analgesia in terms of the main complication of hypotension.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is some evidence that paravertebral analgesia is similar to epidural analgesia in efficacy but superior in maintenance of blood pressure. This is a double blind, randomized control trial comparing paravertebral catheters to epidural catheters for the management of post thoracotomy analgesia. Both groups will undergo placement of a pre-induction epidural catheter as well as a surgically placed paravertebral catheter. Patients will also receive PCA morphine. The primary outcome will be daily morphine use measured in milligrams. The co-primary outcome will be time spent with a systolic blood pressure below 90mmHg. Outcomes will be measured during the first five postoperative days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1R9
        • Health Sciences Centre
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A1R9
        • Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Open thoracotomy
  • Age > 18 yo
  • Able to use a patient controlled analgesia device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous thoracotomy
  • Previous spine surgery
  • Chronic pain condition
  • Ongoing narcotic use
  • Prior narcotic abuse
  • Active chest infection
  • Chest trauma
  • Anticoagulation
  • Other contraindication to epidural catheter placement
  • Allergy to local anesthetic or narcotic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Epidural Catheter 0.2% ropivacaine
Patients will receive an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a range of 0-10 mL/hr through an epidural catheter. They will also receive an infusion of saline at a rate of 0-10 mL/hr through a paravertebral catheter.
0.2% ropivacaine into epidural space and saline into paravertebral space
Active Comparator: Paravertebral Catheter 0.4% ropivacaine
Patients will receive an infusion of 0.4% ropivacaine at a range of 0-10mL/hr through a paravertebral catheter. They will also receive an infusion of saline at a range of 0-10mL/hr through an epidural catheter.
0.4% ropivacaine into paravertebral space and saline into the epidural space

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic Effect
Time Frame: At postoperative day 5
Total cumulative dose of morphine equivalent narcotics.
At postoperative day 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypotension
Time Frame: At postoperative day 5
Cumulative time in which the systolic blood pressure is below 90mmHg.
At postoperative day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sadeesh Srinathan, MD, FRCS C-Th, FRCS(C), University of Manitoba
  • Study Chair: Stephen Kowalski, MD, FRCP, University of Manitoba
  • Study Director: Rob Brown, MD, FRCP, University of Manitoba
  • Study Director: Purnima Rao, MD, University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypotension

Clinical Trials on Epidural Catheter 0.2% ropivacaine

3
Subscribe