PHILOS Augmented - a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Treatment Outcome of PHILOS Screw Augmentation Compared to PHILOS Without Augmentation in Older Adult Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures

The primary objective is to compare the mechanical failure risks in the first year after treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Biomechanical tests have shown that augmentation of screws or nails with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) leads to increased mechanical properties of the bone-implant complex, leading to the assumption that augmentation could reduce mechanical failures in patients. While a few clinical studies have already been performed with augmented trochanteric nails in proximal femur fractures, no clinical studies exist with the use of Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) and (PMMA) augmentation for the treatment of fractures in the proximal humerus.

In this study a new standardized technique for augmentation of screw tips using high viscous PMMA cement (Traumacem V+) with the PHILOS plate will be applied. Fracture treatment with PHILOS Screw Augmentation will be compared with treatment with PHILOS without augmentation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Medical University of Innsbruck
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • University Hospital RWTH Aachen
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79095
        • University Medical Center Freiburg
      • Homburg, Germany, 66421
        • Saarland University Medical Center
      • Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67071
        • BG Clinic Ludwigshafen
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • BG Clinic Tübingen
      • Lucerne, Switzerland, 6000
        • Cantonal Hospital Lucerne
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8063
        • Triemli Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Low energy trauma (e.g. fall from standing height)
  • Radiologically confirmed closed fracture (≤ 10 days) of the proximal humerus
  • Any displaced or unstable 3- or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus (i.e. segment dis-placement > 0.5 cm or angulated > 45°) except isolated displaced fractures of the greater or lesser tuberosity
  • Primary fracture treatment with a PHILOS plate
  • Ability to understand the content of the patient information / informed consent form
  • Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation including imaging and fol-low-up procedures
  • Signed informed consent

Preoperative Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral or previous proximal humerus fractures on either side
  • Splitting fracture of the humeral head or humeral head impression fracture
  • Cuff-arthropathy of the contra- or ipsilateral proximal humerus
  • Associated nerve or vessel injury
  • Any known clotting disorders, severe cardiac and/or pulmonary insufficiency
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the components of Traumacem V+ Cement Kit
  • Any severe systemic disease: class 4 - 6 of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification
  • Any not medically managed severe systemic disease: class 3 of the ASA physical status classification
  • Recent history of substance abuse (i.e. recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment
  • Prisoner
  • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study

Intraoperative Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intraoperative decision to use implants other than PHILOS/PHILOS Screw Augmentation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PHILOS +
Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System with screw tip augmentation (PHILOS+) with high viscous polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement (Traumacem V+).
Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System with screw tip augmentation (PHILOS+) with high viscous polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement (Traumacem V+).
Other Names:
  • PHILOS Length 90 mm with 3 shaft holes
  • PHILOS Length 114 mm with 5 shaft holes
Active Comparator: PHILOS
Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS)
Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS).
Other Names:
  • PHILOS Length 90 mm with 3 shaft holes
  • PHILOS Length 114 mm with 5 shaft holes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any occurrence of radiographically confirmed mechanical failure during the first year after treatment.
Time Frame: one year
Mechanical failures are defined as loss of reduction (≥ 15° increase of varus malposition between the immediate postoperative position and follow-up radiograph, relative change [5 mm] of greater or lesser tuberosity compared to the immediate postoperative position), head impaction (≥ 5 mm difference in outer plate edge and tangent of humeral head between immediate post-op and follow-up. The tangent is determined perpendicular to the humeral neck), screw/plate loosening (any change outwards of screw position in relation to immediate postoperative position) and secondary screw perforation (perforation of one or more screws through the humeral head into the joint space on the follow-up radiograph(and lack of screw perforation on the intra- or postoperative Rx based on a baseline anteroposterior and axial Rx.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient reported outcome (Quality of life)
Time Frame: Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).
Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Intra- and postoperative adverse events related to the procedure and/or device
Time Frame: Up to one year
Implant/surgery , Bone/fracture, Soft tissue of the musculoskeletal system, Wound/other local tissue, Systemic/rest of the body.
Up to one year
Reoperation rate
Time Frame: Up to one year
Up to one year
Surgical details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Surgery duration (skin to skin in min).
Intraoperative
Description of augmentation details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Number of screws augmented.
Intraoperative
Surgical details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Time of day of surgery.
Intraoperative
Surgical details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Number and position of screws used.
Intraoperative
Surgical details
Time Frame: Intra- /postoperative
Anatomic/non-anatomic reduction.
Intra- /postoperative
Surgical details
Time Frame: Intra- /postoperative
Restoration of medial support.
Intra- /postoperative
Description of augmentation details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Number of incidences of direct contrast fluid leakage.
Intraoperative
Description of augmentation details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Augmentation-related adverse events and their association with fracture characteristics.
Intraoperative
Description of augmentation details
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Volume of injected cement (in ml).
Intraoperative
Shoulder function
Time Frame: Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).
Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Shoulder function
Time Frame: Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Constant score.
Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Shoulder function
Time Frame: Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH).
Preoperative, 6 weeks ±7 days, 12 weeks ± 14 days, 6 months ± 30 days, 12 months up to 425 days after surgery
Relation of patient factors on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Comorbidity.
Up to one year
Relation of patient factors on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Mental health with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Up to one year
Relation of patient factors on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Bone mineral density (BMD) measured with CT.
Up to one year
Relation of fracture characteristics on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Number of fracture parts.
Up to one year
Relation of fracture characteristics on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Severity of displacement.
Up to one year
Relation of fracture characteristics on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Varus/valgus.
Up to one year
Relation of surgical factors on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Anatomic/non-anatomic reduction (varus, anteversion etc.).
Up to one year
Relation of surgical factors on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Restoration of medial support.
Up to one year
Relation of surgical factors on mechanical failures
Time Frame: Up to one year
Time of surgery.
Up to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Andreas Faeh, AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Davos, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Franz Kralinger, PD, MD, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PHILOS+

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Humerus Fractures

Clinical Trials on PHILOS+

Subscribe