The Influence of Cerebral Blood Flow and PETCO2 on Neuromuscular Function During Passive Heat Stress

January 25, 2018 updated by: Stephen Cheung, Brock University

Increased core temperature (hyperthermia) has been associated with impaired neuromuscular performance; however, the mechanisms associated with these performance decrements and their potential synergies remain unclear. While the majority of research suggests that the observed fatigue is related to the central nervous system, the influence of changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and associated changes in cerebral alkalosis (estimated by end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PETCO2) remains unexamined. In response to hyperthermia, humans hyperventilate as means of heat dissipation, resulting in a hypocapnia (reduced PETCO2) mediated decrease in CBF and consequently, cerebral alkalosis (increased cerebral pH). Previous research suggests that hyperventilation induces changes in neural excitability and synaptic transmission; however, it remains unclear if these changes are related to hypocapnia mediated decrease in CBF or decreased PETCO2 or both.

The purpose of the proposed research program is to examine the influence of changes in CBF and cerebral alkalosis on neuromuscular function during passive heat stress. The research project will consist of 3 separate experimental trials: (a) poikilocapnic hyperthermia (increased core temperature; decrease CBF; decrease PETCO2), (b) isocapnic hyperthermia (increased core temperature; no change CBF; no change PETCO2) and (c) isocapnic hyperthermia + indomethacin (increased core temperature; decrease CBF; no change PETCO2). During each manipulation, neuromuscular function will be evaluated and compared to baseline (normothermic) conditions using a repeated measures design.

It is hypothesized that changes in PETCO2 and therefore, changes in cerebral alkalosis will contribute to neuromuscular fatigue independent of changes in CBF or increases in core temperature.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • St Catharines, Ontario, Canada, L2S 3A1
        • Brock University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 45 yrs old; healthy males

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed medical condition; NSAID allergy; smoker; high altitude exposure; implants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Drug
Indomethacin, 1.2 mg kg 1 dose
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
generic flour placebo capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting motor threshold
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
Motor evoked potentials are recorded from muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex. The resting motor threshold is defined as the minimum stimulation intensity required to elicit a motor evoked potential. Resting motor threshold will be quantified in millivolts.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
H-Reflex Amplitude
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
The H-Reflex is an indirect measure of motor neuron excitability. Initially, a maximal M-wave (M-max) will be elicited by stimulating (1 ms in duration; 15 s between stimuli) the median nerve incrementally (2 V increments) until the largest waveform is observed. The peak-to-peak amplitude of this waveform is considered M-max. Using similar procedures as above, a sub-maximal M-wave of 5% M-max will be elicited and the amplitude of the resultant H-reflex (a small waveform observed following the submaximal M-wave) will be calculated. The amplitude of the H-reflex will be quantified in millivolts.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
Maximal Voluntary Contraction
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
During maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) testing, the participants' right arm will be secured in a custom made device used to isolate forearm flexion and to measure force production by the flexor carpi radialis muscle. Participants will be asked to produce a 5-second MVC and will be verbally encouraged to maintain maximal force production throughout the duration of the contraction. MVC will be quantified as the maximum force production in newton meters.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
H-Reflex latency
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
The H-Reflex is an indirect measure of motor neuron excitability. Initially, a maximal M-wave (M-max) will be elicited by stimulating (1 ms in duration; 15 s between stimuli) the median nerve incrementally (2 V increments) until the largest waveform is observed. The peak-to-peak amplitude of this waveform is considered M-max. Using similar procedures as above, a sub-maximal M-wave of 5% M-max will be elicited and the amplitude of the resultant H-reflex (a small waveform observed following the submaximal M-wave) will be calculated. The onset latency of the H-reflex will be quantified in milliseconds.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
Voluntary Activation
Time Frame: change from baseline 90-minutes
The level of neural drive to muscle during contraction is termed voluntary activation and will be estimated by interpolation of a single supramaximal motor evoked potential during the 5-second MVC contraction. If extra force is evoked by the 'superimposed' stimulus then either the stimulated axons were not all recruited voluntarily or they were discharging at sub-tetanic rates. Therefore, voluntary activation will be quantified as the amplitude of maximal voluntary force production, relative to the amplitude of the supramaximal MEP.
change from baseline 90-minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Middle Cerebral Artery Blood Flow Velocity
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
Middle cerebral artery (MCA) blood flow velocity will be measured non-invasively by a 2-MHz transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound probe, attached bilaterally to a comfortable headband and secured anterior to the zygomatic arch, rostral of the pinna. Doppler probes will be paced over the temporal windows (near the ear) and will remain in place throughout the duration of the experimental protocol. MCA velocity will be quantified in cm/s.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
Beat by beat blood pressure will be calculated from the blood pressure waveform using finger photoplethysmography (Nexfin, bmeye), with a finger cuff placed directly over the middle finger on the left hand. Blood pressure will be quantified in mmHg.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
Heart rate
Time Frame: Change from baseline 90-minutes
Heart rate will be measured by electrocardiogram. Heart rate will be quantified in beats per minute.
Change from baseline 90-minutes
End-tidal Gas concentrations
Time Frame: change from baseline 90-minutes
The end-tidal concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide will be measured and reported in mmHg.
change from baseline 90-minutes
Rectal Temperature
Time Frame: change from baseline 90-minutes
Rectal temperature will be measured in degrees Celsius
change from baseline 90-minutes
Skin Temperature
Time Frame: change from baseline 90-minutes
skin temperature will be measured in degrees Celsius
change from baseline 90-minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Males

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe