The Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma on Lateral Epicondylitis

October 10, 2018 updated by: Olli Leppänen, Tampere University

The Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: the Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma on Healing -- A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of platelet rich plasma, whole blood and saline vehicle on the natural course of lateral epicondylitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lateral epicondylitis, also known as "tennis elbow", is the most common work-related disease of the upper extremity. Usually it has favorable natural healing-tendency, but sometimes it is responsible for long-lasting disability. The pathogenesis of this disease has remained unclear, however it has been speculated that the role of inflammation is smaller than previously believed. Instead, anatomical and vascular factors may play a much greater role. The evidence for the operative treatment is lacking, and the conservative treatment is therefore preferred. The conservative treatment used to rely largely on corticosteroid injections to the extensor muscle insertions. However, it has been shown that corticosteroids, in fact, tend to increase the subjective pain in the long run. Several studies -- most of them unfortunately underpowered -- have been carried out to find an efficient conservative treatment to this disease, but none of them has turned out to be significantly better than others. During the last couple of years, platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been used as a treatment in several musculoskeletal diseases (e.g. fracture healing, cartilage regeneration, wound healing). PRP is a substance centrifuged from patient own blood. There are a couple of studies regarding the use of PRP in lateral epicondylitis. The results are mostly positive; however it has not been thoroughly shown that it would be more effective than patient's whole blood. The hypothesis of this study is that PRP is more effective in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis than whole blood or saline vehicle injection. The primary outcome measures are pain (VAS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand -score (DASH).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tampere, Finland, 33101
        • Hatanpää City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The duration of symptoms over 3 months
  • Primary conservative treatment (physiotherapy, NSAID, ...) has been tried

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant systemic diseases
  • Any surgical operation of the particular elbow

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle (Saline)
2 ml of saline is injected to the proximal insertion of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) muscle.
Active Comparator: Whole Blood
2 ml of patient own venous blood is injected to the proximal insertion of ECRB.
Experimental: Platelet Rich Plasma
9 ml of patient own venous blood is centrifuged using The Arthrex ACP® Double Syringe System and 2 ml of platelet rich plasma is injected to the proximal insertion of ECRB.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain (Visual Analog Scale)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand -score
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Grip strength (Jamar)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
The duration of the potential sick leave due to lateral epicondylitis
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lateral Epicondylitis

Clinical Trials on Saline Injection

Subscribe